书评:英德拉尼·森,《女人与帝国》。《英属印度文字中的表述(1858-1900)》,新德里,东方朗曼出版社,2002年,第211页

Pub Date : 2004-07-01 DOI:10.1177/001946460404100307
Denys P. Leighton
{"title":"书评:英德拉尼·森,《女人与帝国》。《英属印度文字中的表述(1858-1900)》,新德里,东方朗曼出版社,2002年,第211页","authors":"Denys P. Leighton","doi":"10.1177/001946460404100307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the preface of Woman and Empire, Indrani Sen signals her intention to not contribute to the empirical endeavour of women’s history but to systematically examine Anglo-Indian literary texts of the period 1858-1900 as ’cultural products’. She takes as her subject the representation of Woman in selected non-fiction and fiction texts of Anglo-Indian and ’metropolitan’ (that is, British) writers. Although Dr Sen occasionally alludes to a distinction between literary representations and the ’historical real’ in her discussions of texts, she proceeds from the premise that both ‘literary’ and ’non-fictional’ writings constitute ’constructions [sic] of an imagined reality’ (p. xiii). She acknowledges the ’generic distinctiveness’ of the literary and non-literary texts that form the raw material of her study, while treating them as grist for the mill in the process of decoding ’colonial discursive practice’, the latter being understood as a ’means of exercising power and control’ and ’participating [sic] in the formation of ideologies’ (pp. xii-xiii). In the final analysis, Sen does speak to the ’historical real’ of the Raj-namely the attitudes and assumptions of Anglo-Indian writers, and presumably of their readers, about gender, race and social hierarchy. She refers to relevant recent work in gender history and literary studies-for instance, Jenny Sharpe’s Allegories of Empire and Nancy Paxton’s Writing Under the Raj-while clearly setting out her own judgements about particular texts as well as about","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2004-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/001946460404100307","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Reviews : INDRANI SEN, Woman and Empire. Representations in the Writings of British India (1858-1900), New Delhi, Orient Longman, 2002, pp. 211\",\"authors\":\"Denys P. Leighton\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/001946460404100307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the preface of Woman and Empire, Indrani Sen signals her intention to not contribute to the empirical endeavour of women’s history but to systematically examine Anglo-Indian literary texts of the period 1858-1900 as ’cultural products’. She takes as her subject the representation of Woman in selected non-fiction and fiction texts of Anglo-Indian and ’metropolitan’ (that is, British) writers. Although Dr Sen occasionally alludes to a distinction between literary representations and the ’historical real’ in her discussions of texts, she proceeds from the premise that both ‘literary’ and ’non-fictional’ writings constitute ’constructions [sic] of an imagined reality’ (p. xiii). She acknowledges the ’generic distinctiveness’ of the literary and non-literary texts that form the raw material of her study, while treating them as grist for the mill in the process of decoding ’colonial discursive practice’, the latter being understood as a ’means of exercising power and control’ and ’participating [sic] in the formation of ideologies’ (pp. xii-xiii). In the final analysis, Sen does speak to the ’historical real’ of the Raj-namely the attitudes and assumptions of Anglo-Indian writers, and presumably of their readers, about gender, race and social hierarchy. She refers to relevant recent work in gender history and literary studies-for instance, Jenny Sharpe’s Allegories of Empire and Nancy Paxton’s Writing Under the Raj-while clearly setting out her own judgements about particular texts as well as about\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/001946460404100307\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/001946460404100307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/001946460404100307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在《女人与帝国》的序言中,因德拉尼·森表示,她无意为女性历史的实证研究做出贡献,而是将1858年至1900年期间的盎格鲁-印度文学文本作为“文化产品”进行系统研究。她以女性在精选的英裔印度作家和“大都会”(即英国)作家的非小说和小说文本中的表现为主题。尽管森博士在讨论文本时偶尔提到文学表现和“历史真实”之间的区别,但她的前提是“文学”和“非虚构”作品都构成了“想象现实的结构”(第13页)。她承认文学和非文学文本的“普遍独特性”构成了她研究的原材料。在解码“殖民话语实践”的过程中,将它们视为谷物,后者被理解为“行使权力和控制的手段”和“参与意识形态的形成”(第12 - 13页)。归根到底,森确实谈到了拉杰的“历史真实”——即盎格鲁-印度作家的态度和假设,大概也是他们的读者对性别、种族和社会等级的看法和假设。她参考了最近在性别史和文学研究方面的相关著作——例如,珍妮·夏普的《帝国的寓言》和南希·帕克斯顿的《皇权下的写作》——同时明确地阐述了她对特定文本的判断
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Book Reviews : INDRANI SEN, Woman and Empire. Representations in the Writings of British India (1858-1900), New Delhi, Orient Longman, 2002, pp. 211
In the preface of Woman and Empire, Indrani Sen signals her intention to not contribute to the empirical endeavour of women’s history but to systematically examine Anglo-Indian literary texts of the period 1858-1900 as ’cultural products’. She takes as her subject the representation of Woman in selected non-fiction and fiction texts of Anglo-Indian and ’metropolitan’ (that is, British) writers. Although Dr Sen occasionally alludes to a distinction between literary representations and the ’historical real’ in her discussions of texts, she proceeds from the premise that both ‘literary’ and ’non-fictional’ writings constitute ’constructions [sic] of an imagined reality’ (p. xiii). She acknowledges the ’generic distinctiveness’ of the literary and non-literary texts that form the raw material of her study, while treating them as grist for the mill in the process of decoding ’colonial discursive practice’, the latter being understood as a ’means of exercising power and control’ and ’participating [sic] in the formation of ideologies’ (pp. xii-xiii). In the final analysis, Sen does speak to the ’historical real’ of the Raj-namely the attitudes and assumptions of Anglo-Indian writers, and presumably of their readers, about gender, race and social hierarchy. She refers to relevant recent work in gender history and literary studies-for instance, Jenny Sharpe’s Allegories of Empire and Nancy Paxton’s Writing Under the Raj-while clearly setting out her own judgements about particular texts as well as about
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信