书评:ANDREW ABBOTT，《学科的混乱》，芝加哥，芝加哥大学出版社，2001年，第259页

IF 0.3 2区历史学 Q2 HISTORY

Indian Economic and Social History Review Pub Date : 2003-01-01 DOI:10.1177/001946460304000105

Harish Naraindas

{"title":"书评:ANDREW ABBOTT，《学科的混乱》，芝加哥，芝加哥大学出版社，2001年，第259页","authors":"Harish Naraindas","doi":"10.1177/001946460304000105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chaos l)f ~~I.SC’I f)IllTt’.S’ is a theoretical tour deforce of the social sciences. While the last few decades have witnessed a large body of work on the structure and history of the natural sciences, there has been a surprising paucity of works that theorise the history of the social sciences. Using sociology as a stand in for the social sciences, Abbott argues that the social sciences have been unable to decide as to whether their brief is the study of facts, or the study of values (p. 35). This vacillation is reflected not only in each discipline, but also in every research tradition within the disciplines, whose practitioners soon divide into two antithetical groups of those who study facts and call for causal explanation, as against those who study values and offer inter-","PeriodicalId":45806,"journal":{"name":"Indian Economic and Social History Review","volume":"40 1","pages":"107 - 109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/001946460304000105","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Reviews : ANDREW ABBOTT, Chaos of Disciplines, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2001, pp. 259\",\"authors\":\"Harish Naraindas\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/001946460304000105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chaos l)f ~~I.SC’I f)IllTt’.S’ is a theoretical tour deforce of the social sciences. While the last few decades have witnessed a large body of work on the structure and history of the natural sciences, there has been a surprising paucity of works that theorise the history of the social sciences. Using sociology as a stand in for the social sciences, Abbott argues that the social sciences have been unable to decide as to whether their brief is the study of facts, or the study of values (p. 35). This vacillation is reflected not only in each discipline, but also in every research tradition within the disciplines, whose practitioners soon divide into two antithetical groups of those who study facts and call for causal explanation, as against those who study values and offer inter-\",\"PeriodicalId\":45806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Economic and Social History Review\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"107 - 109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/001946460304000105\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Economic and Social History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/001946460304000105\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Economic and Social History Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/001946460304000105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

混沌1)f ~~I。SC(胡)IllTt”。S’是社会科学的理论力量。在过去的几十年里，我们见证了大量关于自然科学的结构和历史的著作，而将社会科学史理论化的著作却少得惊人。阿博特用社会学来代替社会科学，他认为社会科学一直无法决定它们的目的是研究事实，还是研究价值(第35页)。这种摇摆不仅反映在每一门学科中，也反映在学科内的每一种研究传统中，这些学科的实践者很快就分成了两个对立的群体:研究事实并要求因果解释的群体，与研究价值并提供相互解释的群体

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Book Reviews : ANDREW ABBOTT, Chaos of Disciplines, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2001, pp. 259

Chaos l)f ~~I.SC’I f)IllTt’.S’ is a theoretical tour deforce of the social sciences. While the last few decades have witnessed a large body of work on the structure and history of the natural sciences, there has been a surprising paucity of works that theorise the history of the social sciences. Using sociology as a stand in for the social sciences, Abbott argues that the social sciences have been unable to decide as to whether their brief is the study of facts, or the study of values (p. 35). This vacillation is reflected not only in each discipline, but also in every research tradition within the disciplines, whose practitioners soon divide into two antithetical groups of those who study facts and call for causal explanation, as against those who study values and offer inter-

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Indian Economic and Social History Review Multiple-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： For over 35 years, The Indian Economic and Social History Review has been a meeting ground for scholars whose concerns span diverse cultural and political themes with a bearing on social and economic history. The Indian Economic and Social History Review is the foremost journal devoted to the study of the social and economic history of India, and South Asia more generally. The journal publishes articles with a wider coverage, referring to other Asian countries but of interest to those working on Indian history. Its articles cover India"s South Asian neighbours so as to provide a comparative perspective.