{"title":"那么,“全球”指的是全球治理吗?","authors":"Eşref Aksu","doi":"10.1163/23525207-12340007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores whether the notion of globality is as integral to the various conceptualisations of “global governance” in the pertinent literature as one would justifiably assume. The conceptual analysis here concentrates on well-established clusters of meaning attached to global governance. The main observation is that the nature of globality remains conceptually underdeveloped in the self-conscious global governance literature. The main suggestion against this backdrop is that conceptual clarity is both necessary and possible. Closer reflection on the use of “global” as a linguistic qualifier might prove a useful starting point when seeking such clarity.","PeriodicalId":31142,"journal":{"name":"The Chinese Journal of Global Governance","volume":"1 1","pages":"105-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/23525207-12340007","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What, Then, is ‘Global’ about Global Governance?\",\"authors\":\"Eşref Aksu\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/23525207-12340007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores whether the notion of globality is as integral to the various conceptualisations of “global governance” in the pertinent literature as one would justifiably assume. The conceptual analysis here concentrates on well-established clusters of meaning attached to global governance. The main observation is that the nature of globality remains conceptually underdeveloped in the self-conscious global governance literature. The main suggestion against this backdrop is that conceptual clarity is both necessary and possible. Closer reflection on the use of “global” as a linguistic qualifier might prove a useful starting point when seeking such clarity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Chinese Journal of Global Governance\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"105-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/23525207-12340007\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Chinese Journal of Global Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/23525207-12340007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Chinese Journal of Global Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23525207-12340007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article explores whether the notion of globality is as integral to the various conceptualisations of “global governance” in the pertinent literature as one would justifiably assume. The conceptual analysis here concentrates on well-established clusters of meaning attached to global governance. The main observation is that the nature of globality remains conceptually underdeveloped in the self-conscious global governance literature. The main suggestion against this backdrop is that conceptual clarity is both necessary and possible. Closer reflection on the use of “global” as a linguistic qualifier might prove a useful starting point when seeking such clarity.