美国最高法院的解释方法:奥巴马医改案、堕胎案和外国侵权法案例研究

IF 1.7 Q3 Social Sciences

Tilburg Law Review-Journal of International and Comparative Law Pub Date : 2015-09-30 DOI:10.1163/22112596-02002005

Siel Demeyere, J. Beke, R. Dietvorst

{"title":"美国最高法院的解释方法:奥巴马医改案、堕胎案和外国侵权法案例研究","authors":"Siel Demeyere, J. Beke, R. Dietvorst","doi":"10.1163/22112596-02002005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the interpretation methods used by the United States Supreme Court are studied. We will discuss the interpretation methods used by the Court in the Obamacare case, in abortion cases and in Alien Torts Statute cases. This analysis concludes by asserting the Court is very eclectic in the interpretation methods it uses, although consequential reasoning is most often relied upon.","PeriodicalId":38415,"journal":{"name":"Tilburg Law Review-Journal of International and Comparative Law","volume":"20 1","pages":"142-160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22112596-02002005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpretation Methods in the US Supreme Court: Study of Obamacare, Abortion Cases and Alien Torts Statute Cases\",\"authors\":\"Siel Demeyere, J. Beke, R. Dietvorst\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22112596-02002005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, the interpretation methods used by the United States Supreme Court are studied. We will discuss the interpretation methods used by the Court in the Obamacare case, in abortion cases and in Alien Torts Statute cases. This analysis concludes by asserting the Court is very eclectic in the interpretation methods it uses, although consequential reasoning is most often relied upon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tilburg Law Review-Journal of International and Comparative Law\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"142-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22112596-02002005\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tilburg Law Review-Journal of International and Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22112596-02002005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tilburg Law Review-Journal of International and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22112596-02002005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中，研究了美国最高法院使用的解释方法。我们将讨论法院在奥巴马医改案、堕胎案和外国人侵权法案中使用的解释方法。这一分析的结论是，法院在其使用的解释方法上非常折衷，尽管最常依赖的是结果推理。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Interpretation Methods in the US Supreme Court: Study of Obamacare, Abortion Cases and Alien Torts Statute Cases

In this article, the interpretation methods used by the United States Supreme Court are studied. We will discuss the interpretation methods used by the Court in the Obamacare case, in abortion cases and in Alien Torts Statute cases. This analysis concludes by asserting the Court is very eclectic in the interpretation methods it uses, although consequential reasoning is most often relied upon.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Tilburg Law Review-Journal of International and Comparative Law LAW-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks