Prema-chandra Athukorala评论《在全球物理冲击时代重新思考“经济基本面”:来自菲律宾应对COVID-19经验的见解》

IF 5.3 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
P. Athukorala
{"title":"Prema-chandra Athukorala评论《在全球物理冲击时代重新思考“经济基本面”:来自菲律宾应对COVID-19经验的见解》","authors":"P. Athukorala","doi":"10.1162/asep_a_00820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the time of the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the economy of the Philippines had strong macroeconomic fundamentals—a decade of robust growth at an average annual rate of 6 percent, low inflation, remarkably low external debt exposure, strong fiscal position, and the highest ever sovereign debt rating—which are commonly identified as prerequisites for facing external economic shocks with comfort. Yet the Philippines has turned out to be one of the worst-hit countries in East Asia from the coronavirus. Its mortality rate (19.9 per million population, at the time of writing this paper) is comparable only to that of Indonesia, and, on average, almost five times that of other countries in the region. The projected growth contraction in 2020 ( − 8.3 percent) was by far the highest among these countries. The authors set out to examine why this massive growth contraction in GDP occurred against the initial robust macroeconomic fundamentals that permitted the government to predict that, even under the worst possible scenario, the economy could still grow in 2019 and in the medium term by about 6 percent. The paper begins with a stage-setting analytical narrative from a comparative East Asian perspective of the economic conditions of the country in the lead up to and during the pandemic, the humanitarian cost of the pandemic in terms of morbidity and mortality, and the response of the government to cushion the economy against the pandemic’s effects. The authors endorse the view that the lockdown of the economy—via an enhanced community quarantine imposed on the island of Luzon that constitutes 70 percent of the Philippine economy for six weeks and a general community quarantine in the rest of the country—was necessary to hold the pandemic at bay and thus buy time to capacitate the health system to effectively respond to the pandemic. They then convincingly argue, based on a comparison","PeriodicalId":52020,"journal":{"name":"Asian Economic Papers","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prema-chandra Athukorala Comment on Rethinking “Economic Fundamentals” in an Era of Global Physical Shocks: Insights from the Philippines Experience with COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"P. Athukorala\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/asep_a_00820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the time of the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the economy of the Philippines had strong macroeconomic fundamentals—a decade of robust growth at an average annual rate of 6 percent, low inflation, remarkably low external debt exposure, strong fiscal position, and the highest ever sovereign debt rating—which are commonly identified as prerequisites for facing external economic shocks with comfort. Yet the Philippines has turned out to be one of the worst-hit countries in East Asia from the coronavirus. Its mortality rate (19.9 per million population, at the time of writing this paper) is comparable only to that of Indonesia, and, on average, almost five times that of other countries in the region. The projected growth contraction in 2020 ( − 8.3 percent) was by far the highest among these countries. The authors set out to examine why this massive growth contraction in GDP occurred against the initial robust macroeconomic fundamentals that permitted the government to predict that, even under the worst possible scenario, the economy could still grow in 2019 and in the medium term by about 6 percent. The paper begins with a stage-setting analytical narrative from a comparative East Asian perspective of the economic conditions of the country in the lead up to and during the pandemic, the humanitarian cost of the pandemic in terms of morbidity and mortality, and the response of the government to cushion the economy against the pandemic’s effects. The authors endorse the view that the lockdown of the economy—via an enhanced community quarantine imposed on the island of Luzon that constitutes 70 percent of the Philippine economy for six weeks and a general community quarantine in the rest of the country—was necessary to hold the pandemic at bay and thus buy time to capacitate the health system to effectively respond to the pandemic. They then convincingly argue, based on a comparison\",\"PeriodicalId\":52020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Economic Papers\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Economic Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00820\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Economic Papers","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00820","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2019冠状病毒病大流行爆发时,菲律宾经济具有强劲的宏观经济基本面——十年来年均6%的强劲增长、低通胀、非常低的外债敞口、强劲的财政状况以及有史以来最高的主权债务评级——这些通常被认为是安然应对外部经济冲击的先决条件。然而,菲律宾已成为东亚受冠状病毒影响最严重的国家之一。它的死亡率(在撰写本文时,每百万人中有19.9人死亡)仅与印度尼西亚相当,平均而言,几乎是该区域其他国家的五倍。到目前为止,预计2020年的增长收缩幅度(- 8.3%)是这些国家中最大的。作者开始研究为什么GDP的大幅增长收缩发生在最初强劲的宏观经济基本面的情况下,这使得政府能够预测,即使在最坏的情况下,经济仍可能在2019年和中期增长约6%。本文首先从比较东亚的角度出发,对疫情前和疫情期间该国的经济状况、疫情在发病率和死亡率方面的人道主义成本以及政府为缓解疫情影响而采取的应对措施进行了背景分析。作者赞同这样一种观点,即经济封锁——通过对占菲律宾经济70%的吕宋岛实施为期六周的加强社区隔离,以及在全国其他地区实施全面社区隔离——对于遏制疫情是必要的,从而为卫生系统有效应对疫情赢得时间。然后,基于比较,他们令人信服地论证
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prema-chandra Athukorala Comment on Rethinking “Economic Fundamentals” in an Era of Global Physical Shocks: Insights from the Philippines Experience with COVID-19
At the time of the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the economy of the Philippines had strong macroeconomic fundamentals—a decade of robust growth at an average annual rate of 6 percent, low inflation, remarkably low external debt exposure, strong fiscal position, and the highest ever sovereign debt rating—which are commonly identified as prerequisites for facing external economic shocks with comfort. Yet the Philippines has turned out to be one of the worst-hit countries in East Asia from the coronavirus. Its mortality rate (19.9 per million population, at the time of writing this paper) is comparable only to that of Indonesia, and, on average, almost five times that of other countries in the region. The projected growth contraction in 2020 ( − 8.3 percent) was by far the highest among these countries. The authors set out to examine why this massive growth contraction in GDP occurred against the initial robust macroeconomic fundamentals that permitted the government to predict that, even under the worst possible scenario, the economy could still grow in 2019 and in the medium term by about 6 percent. The paper begins with a stage-setting analytical narrative from a comparative East Asian perspective of the economic conditions of the country in the lead up to and during the pandemic, the humanitarian cost of the pandemic in terms of morbidity and mortality, and the response of the government to cushion the economy against the pandemic’s effects. The authors endorse the view that the lockdown of the economy—via an enhanced community quarantine imposed on the island of Luzon that constitutes 70 percent of the Philippine economy for six weeks and a general community quarantine in the rest of the country—was necessary to hold the pandemic at bay and thus buy time to capacitate the health system to effectively respond to the pandemic. They then convincingly argue, based on a comparison
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The journal Asian Economic Papers (AEP) is supported by several prominent institutions, including the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University in the United States. This shows that there is a strong emphasis on sustainable development within the journal's scope. Additionally, the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy in South Korea, the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) in Malaysia, and the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia in Indonesia also sponsor AEP. The articles published in AEP focus on conducting thorough and rigorous analyses of significant economic issues pertaining to specific Asian economies or the broader Asian region. The aim is to gain a deeper understanding of these issues and provide innovative solutions. By offering creative solutions to economic challenges, AEP contributes to the discourse and policymaking that impact the Asian economies and region as a whole.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信