藏语和缅甸语中古汉语-n， -r和*-j的同源词

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale Pub Date : 2014-10-09 DOI:10.1163/19606028-00432P02

N. Hill

{"title":"藏语和缅甸语中古汉语*-n， *-r和*-j的同源词","authors":"N. Hill","doi":"10.1163/19606028-00432P02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following a suggestion of Starostin (1989), Baxter & Sagart (2011) reconstruct *-n, *-j, and *-r as distinct finals in Old Chinese. These three finals have regular correspondences in Tibetan and Burmese. The Trans-Himalayan proto-language distinguished *-n, *-j, *-r, *-l, and *-rl. Burmese loses *-r and generally loses *-l, except after -u-, where it changes to -y. Tibetan loses *-y and changes *-rl to -l. Chinese changes *-rl to *-r. Because Burmese shows different reflexes for *aj (-ay) and *əj (> -i), the merger of *ə and *a in Tibetan and Burmese are independent innovations; and this merger does not confirm a ‘Tibeto-Burman’ subgroup (contra Handel 2008). These correspondences require confirmation through further research on evidence of *-r in the Min dialects and Han dynasty Buddhist transcriptions from Indic languages in Chinese characters.","PeriodicalId":35117,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale","volume":"43 1","pages":"91-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/19606028-00432P02","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognates of Old Chinese *-n, *-r, and *-j in Tibetan and Burmese\",\"authors\":\"N. Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/19606028-00432P02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following a suggestion of Starostin (1989), Baxter & Sagart (2011) reconstruct *-n, *-j, and *-r as distinct finals in Old Chinese. These three finals have regular correspondences in Tibetan and Burmese. The Trans-Himalayan proto-language distinguished *-n, *-j, *-r, *-l, and *-rl. Burmese loses *-r and generally loses *-l, except after -u-, where it changes to -y. Tibetan loses *-y and changes *-rl to -l. Chinese changes *-rl to *-r. Because Burmese shows different reflexes for *aj (-ay) and *əj (> -i), the merger of *ə and *a in Tibetan and Burmese are independent innovations; and this merger does not confirm a ‘Tibeto-Burman’ subgroup (contra Handel 2008). These correspondences require confirmation through further research on evidence of *-r in the Min dialects and Han dynasty Buddhist transcriptions from Indic languages in Chinese characters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"91-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/19606028-00432P02\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-00432P02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-00432P02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 19

摘要

根据Starostin(1989)的建议，Baxter & Sagart(2011)重建了古汉语中*-n、*-j和*-r三个不同的韵母。这三个韵母在藏语和缅甸语中有固定的对应关系。跨喜马拉雅原始语言区分*-n、*-j、*-r、*-l和*-rl。缅甸语省略了*-r，通常省略了*-l，除了在-u-之后，它变成了-y。藏文去掉*-y，将*-rl改为-l。中文将*-r改为*-r。由于缅甸语对*aj (-ay)和* * j (> -i)的反射不同，西藏语和缅甸语中* *和*a的合并是独立的创新;这次合并并没有确认“藏缅”子群体(contra Handel 2008)。这些对应关系需要通过进一步研究闽方言中*-r的证据和汉代佛教从印度语转写的汉字来证实。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Cognates of Old Chinese *-n, *-r, and *-j in Tibetan and Burmese

Following a suggestion of Starostin (1989), Baxter & Sagart (2011) reconstruct *-n, *-j, and *-r as distinct finals in Old Chinese. These three finals have regular correspondences in Tibetan and Burmese. The Trans-Himalayan proto-language distinguished *-n, *-j, *-r, *-l, and *-rl. Burmese loses *-r and generally loses *-l, except after -u-, where it changes to -y. Tibetan loses *-y and changes *-rl to -l. Chinese changes *-rl to *-r. Because Burmese shows different reflexes for *aj (-ay) and *əj (> -i), the merger of *ə and *a in Tibetan and Burmese are independent innovations; and this merger does not confirm a ‘Tibeto-Burman’ subgroup (contra Handel 2008). These correspondences require confirmation through further research on evidence of *-r in the Min dialects and Han dynasty Buddhist transcriptions from Indic languages in Chinese characters.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Cahiers is an international linguistics journal whose mission is to publish new and original research on the analysis of languages of the Asian region, be they descriptive or theoretical. This clearly reflects the broad research domain of our laboratory : the Centre for Linguistic Research on East Asian Languages (CRLAO). The journal was created in 1977 by Viviane Alleton and Alain Peyraube and has been directed by three successive teams of editors, all professors based at the CRLAO in Paris. An Editorial Board, composed of scholars from around the world, assists in the reviewing process and in a consultative role.