观察社会刺激对疼痛联觉者和控制者细微躯体感觉的影响不同

S. Vandenbroucke, G. Crombez, D. V. Ryckeghem, V. Harrar, L. Goubert, C. Spence, Wouter Durnez, S. Damme
{"title":"观察社会刺激对疼痛联觉者和控制者细微躯体感觉的影响不同","authors":"S. Vandenbroucke, G. Crombez, D. V. Ryckeghem, V. Harrar, L. Goubert, C. Spence, Wouter Durnez, S. Damme","doi":"10.1163/187847612X646415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: There is preliminary evidence that viewing touch or pain can modulate the experience of tactile stimulation. The aim of this study was to develop an experimental paradigm to investigate whether the observation of needle pricks to another person’s hand facilitates the detection of subtle somatic sensations. Furthermore, differences between control persons and persons reporting synaesthesia for pain (i.e., experiencing observed pain as if it is their own pain) will be examined. Method: Synaesthetes ( n = 15 ) and controls ( n = 20 ) were presented a series of videos showing left or right hands being pricked and control videos (e.g., a sponge being pricked), whilst receiving occasionally subtle threshold sensations themselves on the hand in the same spatial location (congruent trials) or in the opposite location (incongruent trials) as the visual stimuli. Participants were asked to detect the sensory stimulus. Signal detection theory was used to compare whether sensitivity was different for both groups and both categories of visual stimuli. Results: Overall, perceptual sensitivity (d′) was significantly higher when the visual stimuli involved a painful situation (e.g., needle pricking another’s hand) compared to the control videos, and was significantly lower in synaesthetes compared to control participants. When no sensory stimulus was administered, participants reported significantly more illusory sensations when a painful situation was depicted compared to a non-painful situation. Discussion: This study suggests that the detection of somatic sensations can be facilitated or inhibited by observing visual stimuli. Synaesthetes were generally less sensitive, suggesting that they experience more difficulties in disentangling somatic and visual stimuli.","PeriodicalId":49553,"journal":{"name":"Seeing and Perceiving","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/187847612X646415","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observing social stimuli influences detection of subtle somatic sensations differently for pain synaesthetes and controls\",\"authors\":\"S. Vandenbroucke, G. Crombez, D. V. Ryckeghem, V. Harrar, L. Goubert, C. Spence, Wouter Durnez, S. Damme\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/187847612X646415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: There is preliminary evidence that viewing touch or pain can modulate the experience of tactile stimulation. The aim of this study was to develop an experimental paradigm to investigate whether the observation of needle pricks to another person’s hand facilitates the detection of subtle somatic sensations. Furthermore, differences between control persons and persons reporting synaesthesia for pain (i.e., experiencing observed pain as if it is their own pain) will be examined. Method: Synaesthetes ( n = 15 ) and controls ( n = 20 ) were presented a series of videos showing left or right hands being pricked and control videos (e.g., a sponge being pricked), whilst receiving occasionally subtle threshold sensations themselves on the hand in the same spatial location (congruent trials) or in the opposite location (incongruent trials) as the visual stimuli. Participants were asked to detect the sensory stimulus. Signal detection theory was used to compare whether sensitivity was different for both groups and both categories of visual stimuli. Results: Overall, perceptual sensitivity (d′) was significantly higher when the visual stimuli involved a painful situation (e.g., needle pricking another’s hand) compared to the control videos, and was significantly lower in synaesthetes compared to control participants. When no sensory stimulus was administered, participants reported significantly more illusory sensations when a painful situation was depicted compared to a non-painful situation. Discussion: This study suggests that the detection of somatic sensations can be facilitated or inhibited by observing visual stimuli. Synaesthetes were generally less sensitive, suggesting that they experience more difficulties in disentangling somatic and visual stimuli.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seeing and Perceiving\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/187847612X646415\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seeing and Perceiving\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/187847612X646415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seeing and Perceiving","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/187847612X646415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

有初步证据表明,视觉触觉或疼痛可以调节触觉刺激的体验。本研究的目的是建立一个实验范式,以调查观察针刺到另一个人的手是否有助于检测微妙的身体感觉。此外,对照者和报告疼痛联觉者之间的差异(即,将观察到的疼痛视为自己的疼痛)将被检查。方法:向联觉者(n = 15)和对照组(n = 20)展示了一系列显示左手或右手被刺痛的视频和对照视频(例如,海绵被刺痛),同时在视觉刺激的同一空间位置(一致试验)或相反位置(不一致试验)接收偶尔微妙的手部阈值感觉。参与者被要求检测感官刺激。采用信号检测理论比较两组和两类视觉刺激的敏感性是否不同。结果:总的来说,与对照视频相比,当视觉刺激涉及到痛苦情境(例如,针扎别人的手)时,联觉者的感知敏感性(d ')显著更高,而与对照视频相比,联觉者的感知敏感性(d ')显著更低。在没有感官刺激的情况下,当描述痛苦情境时,参与者报告的虚幻感觉明显多于描述非痛苦情境时。讨论:这项研究表明,通过观察视觉刺激可以促进或抑制躯体感觉的检测。联觉者通常不那么敏感,这表明他们在分离躯体和视觉刺激时遇到了更多的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Observing social stimuli influences detection of subtle somatic sensations differently for pain synaesthetes and controls
Introduction: There is preliminary evidence that viewing touch or pain can modulate the experience of tactile stimulation. The aim of this study was to develop an experimental paradigm to investigate whether the observation of needle pricks to another person’s hand facilitates the detection of subtle somatic sensations. Furthermore, differences between control persons and persons reporting synaesthesia for pain (i.e., experiencing observed pain as if it is their own pain) will be examined. Method: Synaesthetes ( n = 15 ) and controls ( n = 20 ) were presented a series of videos showing left or right hands being pricked and control videos (e.g., a sponge being pricked), whilst receiving occasionally subtle threshold sensations themselves on the hand in the same spatial location (congruent trials) or in the opposite location (incongruent trials) as the visual stimuli. Participants were asked to detect the sensory stimulus. Signal detection theory was used to compare whether sensitivity was different for both groups and both categories of visual stimuli. Results: Overall, perceptual sensitivity (d′) was significantly higher when the visual stimuli involved a painful situation (e.g., needle pricking another’s hand) compared to the control videos, and was significantly lower in synaesthetes compared to control participants. When no sensory stimulus was administered, participants reported significantly more illusory sensations when a painful situation was depicted compared to a non-painful situation. Discussion: This study suggests that the detection of somatic sensations can be facilitated or inhibited by observing visual stimuli. Synaesthetes were generally less sensitive, suggesting that they experience more difficulties in disentangling somatic and visual stimuli.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seeing and Perceiving
Seeing and Perceiving BIOPHYSICS-PSYCHOLOGY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信