抗生素耐药性预测:两种时间序列预测模型的比较

Darja Strahlberg
{"title":"抗生素耐药性预测:两种时间序列预测模型的比较","authors":"Darja Strahlberg","doi":"10.1137/20s1365284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of antibiotic resistance is a growing challenge for global health. Antibiotics are used for disease treatment, as well as for medical procedures, for instance, operations and transplants. The aim of this work is to compare auto-regressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and recurrent neural networks (RNN) to forecast the spread of drug-resistant bacterial infections at the community level. The comparison of two algorithms is performed for a multistep time series univariate dataset. Five distinct time series were modelled, each one representing the number of episodes per single ESKAPE infecting pathogen, that has occurred quarterly between 2008 and 2018 calendar years in Germany. The forecast quality is evaluated by the root mean squared error between the forecasted values and the test data set. The experimental results show that multi-neural network forecasting RNN is significantly poorer than ARIMA for multi-step forecasting on univariate datasets. Finally, the paper provides a conclusion, that machine learning complexity is not always adding skill to the forecast. The forthcoming challenges are setting conditions when machine learning models can perform well for the real-world applications. The code used to evaluate the concept is available.","PeriodicalId":93373,"journal":{"name":"SIAM undergraduate research online","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotics Resistance Forecasting: A Comparison of Two Time Series Forecast Models\",\"authors\":\"Darja Strahlberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1137/20s1365284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rise of antibiotic resistance is a growing challenge for global health. Antibiotics are used for disease treatment, as well as for medical procedures, for instance, operations and transplants. The aim of this work is to compare auto-regressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and recurrent neural networks (RNN) to forecast the spread of drug-resistant bacterial infections at the community level. The comparison of two algorithms is performed for a multistep time series univariate dataset. Five distinct time series were modelled, each one representing the number of episodes per single ESKAPE infecting pathogen, that has occurred quarterly between 2008 and 2018 calendar years in Germany. The forecast quality is evaluated by the root mean squared error between the forecasted values and the test data set. The experimental results show that multi-neural network forecasting RNN is significantly poorer than ARIMA for multi-step forecasting on univariate datasets. Finally, the paper provides a conclusion, that machine learning complexity is not always adding skill to the forecast. The forthcoming challenges are setting conditions when machine learning models can perform well for the real-world applications. The code used to evaluate the concept is available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIAM undergraduate research online\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIAM undergraduate research online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1137/20s1365284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIAM undergraduate research online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/20s1365284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

抗生素耐药性的上升对全球卫生构成了日益严峻的挑战。抗生素既用于疾病治疗,也用于医疗程序,例如手术和移植。这项工作的目的是比较自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)和循环神经网络(RNN)来预测耐药细菌感染在社区层面的传播。针对多步时间序列单变量数据集,对两种算法进行了比较。研究人员对五个不同的时间序列进行了建模,每个时间序列代表了2008年至2018年德国每季度发生的单个ESKAPE感染病原体的发作次数。通过预测值与测试数据集之间的均方根误差来评估预测质量。实验结果表明,对于单变量数据集的多步预测,多神经网络预测RNN明显不如ARIMA。最后,本文给出了一个结论,即机器学习的复杂性并不总是为预测增加技能。即将到来的挑战是为机器学习模型在现实世界的应用中表现良好设定条件。用于评估该概念的代码是可用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antibiotics Resistance Forecasting: A Comparison of Two Time Series Forecast Models
The rise of antibiotic resistance is a growing challenge for global health. Antibiotics are used for disease treatment, as well as for medical procedures, for instance, operations and transplants. The aim of this work is to compare auto-regressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and recurrent neural networks (RNN) to forecast the spread of drug-resistant bacterial infections at the community level. The comparison of two algorithms is performed for a multistep time series univariate dataset. Five distinct time series were modelled, each one representing the number of episodes per single ESKAPE infecting pathogen, that has occurred quarterly between 2008 and 2018 calendar years in Germany. The forecast quality is evaluated by the root mean squared error between the forecasted values and the test data set. The experimental results show that multi-neural network forecasting RNN is significantly poorer than ARIMA for multi-step forecasting on univariate datasets. Finally, the paper provides a conclusion, that machine learning complexity is not always adding skill to the forecast. The forthcoming challenges are setting conditions when machine learning models can perform well for the real-world applications. The code used to evaluate the concept is available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信