J. M. Arreola-Guerra, N. Castelán, A. de Santiago, A. Arvizu, Norma González-Tableros, Mayra López, I. Salcedo, M. Vilatoba, J. Granados, L. Morales-Buenrostro, J. Alberú
{"title":"补体依赖性细胞毒性交叉配型阴性肾移植候选人供体特异性抗体的C1Q检测结果:在预测血流交叉配型时,高特异性但低敏感性","authors":"J. M. Arreola-Guerra, N. Castelán, A. de Santiago, A. Arvizu, Norma González-Tableros, Mayra López, I. Salcedo, M. Vilatoba, J. Granados, L. Morales-Buenrostro, J. Alberú","doi":"10.1155/2016/2106028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the present study was to describe the association of positive flow cross match (FXM) and C1q-SAB. Methods. In this observational, cross-sectional, and comparative study, patients included had negative AHG-CDC-XM and donor specific antibodies (DSA) and were tested with FXM. All pretransplant sera were tested with C1q-SAB assay. Results. A total of 50 donor/recipient evaluations were conducted; half of them had at least one C1q+ Ab (n = 26, 52%). Ten patients (20.0%) had DSA C1q+ Ab. Twenty-five (50%) FXMs were positive. Factors associated with a positive FXM were the presence of C1q+ Ab (DSA C1q+ Ab: OR 27, 2.80–259.56, P = 0.004, and no DSA C1q+ Ab: OR 5, 1.27–19.68, P = 0.021) and the DSA LABScreen-SAB MFI (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06–1.49, P = 0.007). The cutoff point of immunodominant LABScreen SAB DSA-MFI with the greatest sensitivity and specificity to predict FXM was 2,300 (sensitivity: 72% and specificity: 75%). For FXM prediction, DSA C1q+ Ab was the most specific (95.8%, 85–100) and the combination of DSA-MFI > 2,300 and C1q+ Ab was the most sensitive (92.0%, 79.3–100). Conclusions. C1q+ Ab and LABScreen SAB DSA-MFI were significantly associated with FXM. DSA C1q+ Ab was highly specific but with low sensitivity.","PeriodicalId":45795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transplantation","volume":"2016 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/2106028","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"C1Q Assay Results in Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity Crossmatch Negative Renal Transplant Candidates with Donor-Specific Antibodies: High Specificity but Low Sensitivity When Predicting Flow Crossmatch\",\"authors\":\"J. M. Arreola-Guerra, N. Castelán, A. de Santiago, A. Arvizu, Norma González-Tableros, Mayra López, I. Salcedo, M. Vilatoba, J. Granados, L. Morales-Buenrostro, J. Alberú\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2016/2106028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the present study was to describe the association of positive flow cross match (FXM) and C1q-SAB. Methods. In this observational, cross-sectional, and comparative study, patients included had negative AHG-CDC-XM and donor specific antibodies (DSA) and were tested with FXM. All pretransplant sera were tested with C1q-SAB assay. Results. A total of 50 donor/recipient evaluations were conducted; half of them had at least one C1q+ Ab (n = 26, 52%). Ten patients (20.0%) had DSA C1q+ Ab. Twenty-five (50%) FXMs were positive. Factors associated with a positive FXM were the presence of C1q+ Ab (DSA C1q+ Ab: OR 27, 2.80–259.56, P = 0.004, and no DSA C1q+ Ab: OR 5, 1.27–19.68, P = 0.021) and the DSA LABScreen-SAB MFI (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06–1.49, P = 0.007). The cutoff point of immunodominant LABScreen SAB DSA-MFI with the greatest sensitivity and specificity to predict FXM was 2,300 (sensitivity: 72% and specificity: 75%). For FXM prediction, DSA C1q+ Ab was the most specific (95.8%, 85–100) and the combination of DSA-MFI > 2,300 and C1q+ Ab was the most sensitive (92.0%, 79.3–100). Conclusions. C1q+ Ab and LABScreen SAB DSA-MFI were significantly associated with FXM. DSA C1q+ Ab was highly specific but with low sensitivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"2016 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/2106028\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2106028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2106028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
本研究的目的是描述正流交叉匹配(FXM)与C1q-SAB的关系。方法。在这项观察性、横断面和比较研究中,纳入的患者AHG-CDC-XM和供体特异性抗体(DSA)均为阴性,并进行了FXM检测。所有移植前血清均采用C1q-SAB检测。结果。总共进行了50次捐助国/受援国评价;半数患者至少有一种C1q+ Ab (n = 26, 52%)。10例(20.0%)DSA C1q+ Ab, 25例(50%)FXMs阳性。与FXM阳性相关的因素是C1q+ Ab的存在(DSA C1q+ Ab: OR 27, 2.80-259.56, P = 0.004,无DSA C1q+ Ab: OR 5, 1.27-19.68, P = 0.021)和DSA LABScreen-SAB MFI (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06-1.49, P = 0.007)。免疫优势的LABScreen SAB DSA-MFI预测FXM的灵敏度和特异性最高的截止点为2300(灵敏度为72%,特异性为75%)。对于FXM的预测,DSA C1q+ Ab的特异性最高(95.8%,85-100),DSA- mfi bbb2300与C1q+ Ab的联合预测敏感性最高(92.0%,79.3-100)。结论。C1q+ Ab和LABScreen SAB DSA-MFI与FXM显著相关。DSA C1q+ Ab特异度高,敏感性低。
C1Q Assay Results in Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity Crossmatch Negative Renal Transplant Candidates with Donor-Specific Antibodies: High Specificity but Low Sensitivity When Predicting Flow Crossmatch
The aim of the present study was to describe the association of positive flow cross match (FXM) and C1q-SAB. Methods. In this observational, cross-sectional, and comparative study, patients included had negative AHG-CDC-XM and donor specific antibodies (DSA) and were tested with FXM. All pretransplant sera were tested with C1q-SAB assay. Results. A total of 50 donor/recipient evaluations were conducted; half of them had at least one C1q+ Ab (n = 26, 52%). Ten patients (20.0%) had DSA C1q+ Ab. Twenty-five (50%) FXMs were positive. Factors associated with a positive FXM were the presence of C1q+ Ab (DSA C1q+ Ab: OR 27, 2.80–259.56, P = 0.004, and no DSA C1q+ Ab: OR 5, 1.27–19.68, P = 0.021) and the DSA LABScreen-SAB MFI (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06–1.49, P = 0.007). The cutoff point of immunodominant LABScreen SAB DSA-MFI with the greatest sensitivity and specificity to predict FXM was 2,300 (sensitivity: 72% and specificity: 75%). For FXM prediction, DSA C1q+ Ab was the most specific (95.8%, 85–100) and the combination of DSA-MFI > 2,300 and C1q+ Ab was the most sensitive (92.0%, 79.3–100). Conclusions. C1q+ Ab and LABScreen SAB DSA-MFI were significantly associated with FXM. DSA C1q+ Ab was highly specific but with low sensitivity.