扩展Bafna-Pevzner算法

Q2 Medicine
Ulisses Dias, Zanoni Dias
{"title":"扩展Bafna-Pevzner算法","authors":"Ulisses Dias, Zanoni Dias","doi":"10.1145/1722024.1722051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Genome Rearrangement is a field that addresses the problem of finding the minimum number of global operations, such as transpositions, reversals, fusions and fissions that transform a given genome into another. In this work we deal with transposition events, which are events that change the position of two contiguous block of genes in the same chromosome.\n Some approximation algorithms for this problem were published so far. Bafna and Pevzner [1] proposed the first 1.5-approximation algorithm for the transposition distance problem and recently Elias and Hartman [4] delineated a 1.375-approximation algorithm, which is currently the best performance ratio known. Many other algorithms achieve good performance on experimental results and provide new insights to solve the problem [2, 5, 8, 9, 11].\n In this paper we present two main results. The first result is the implementation of the 1.375-algorithm described by Elias and Hartman [4]. We also compared the experimental results from Elias-Hartman algorithm with other approaches. It is important to realize that no implementation of Elias-Hartman algorithm was provided before this work and the approximation proof was assisted by a computer program. Although the approximation ratio is an important issue, we need to know how the algorithm behaves on practical experiments. For this reason, we show the experimental results of Elias-Hartman algorithm using our datasets.\n The second result is the description of our algorithm based on Bafna and Pevzner [1] 1.5-approximation algorithm. Our algorithm uses a set of heuristics that allowed us to improve the solution quality of the original algorithm, but keeping the original 1.5-approximation ratio. We compare our experimental results with the best results published so far. The results indicate that our algorithm performs best in practice. The solution quality analysis also shows that our algorithm outperforms Elias and Hartman 1.375-approximation algorithm on longer permutations, despite the approximation ratio.\n We delineate an algorithm for the transposition distance problem. Our algorithm is the first polynomial time algorithm that sorts by transposition any permutation π, for |π| = 9. We show that our algorithm is better than the other algorithms using sequences π, for π < 11. We also show that our algorithm keeps the good performance on longer permutations. We claim that the heuristics proposed in this work contribute for discovering the complexity of sorting by transposition, which remains open.","PeriodicalId":39379,"journal":{"name":"In Silico Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1145/1722024.1722051","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extending Bafna-Pevzner algorithm\",\"authors\":\"Ulisses Dias, Zanoni Dias\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1722024.1722051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Genome Rearrangement is a field that addresses the problem of finding the minimum number of global operations, such as transpositions, reversals, fusions and fissions that transform a given genome into another. In this work we deal with transposition events, which are events that change the position of two contiguous block of genes in the same chromosome.\\n Some approximation algorithms for this problem were published so far. Bafna and Pevzner [1] proposed the first 1.5-approximation algorithm for the transposition distance problem and recently Elias and Hartman [4] delineated a 1.375-approximation algorithm, which is currently the best performance ratio known. Many other algorithms achieve good performance on experimental results and provide new insights to solve the problem [2, 5, 8, 9, 11].\\n In this paper we present two main results. The first result is the implementation of the 1.375-algorithm described by Elias and Hartman [4]. We also compared the experimental results from Elias-Hartman algorithm with other approaches. It is important to realize that no implementation of Elias-Hartman algorithm was provided before this work and the approximation proof was assisted by a computer program. Although the approximation ratio is an important issue, we need to know how the algorithm behaves on practical experiments. For this reason, we show the experimental results of Elias-Hartman algorithm using our datasets.\\n The second result is the description of our algorithm based on Bafna and Pevzner [1] 1.5-approximation algorithm. Our algorithm uses a set of heuristics that allowed us to improve the solution quality of the original algorithm, but keeping the original 1.5-approximation ratio. We compare our experimental results with the best results published so far. The results indicate that our algorithm performs best in practice. The solution quality analysis also shows that our algorithm outperforms Elias and Hartman 1.375-approximation algorithm on longer permutations, despite the approximation ratio.\\n We delineate an algorithm for the transposition distance problem. Our algorithm is the first polynomial time algorithm that sorts by transposition any permutation π, for |π| = 9. We show that our algorithm is better than the other algorithms using sequences π, for π < 11. We also show that our algorithm keeps the good performance on longer permutations. We claim that the heuristics proposed in this work contribute for discovering the complexity of sorting by transposition, which remains open.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In Silico Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1145/1722024.1722051\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In Silico Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1722024.1722051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In Silico Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1722024.1722051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

基因组重排是一个解决寻找最小数量的全局操作问题的领域,例如将给定基因组转换为另一个基因组的转位,反转,融合和裂变。在这项工作中,我们处理转位事件,这是改变两个连续的基因块在同一染色体上的位置的事件。目前已经发表了一些求解该问题的近似算法。Bafna和Pevzner[1]提出了移位距离问题的第一个1.5近似算法,最近Elias和Hartman[4]提出了目前已知性能最好的1.375近似算法。许多其他算法在实验结果上取得了良好的性能,并为解决问题提供了新的见解[2,5,8,9,11]。在本文中,我们提出了两个主要结果。第一个结果是Elias和Hartman[4]描述的1.375算法的实现。并将Elias-Hartman算法与其他方法的实验结果进行了比较。重要的是要认识到,在此工作之前没有提供Elias-Hartman算法的实现,并且近似证明是由计算机程序辅助的。虽然近似比是一个重要的问题,但我们需要知道算法在实际实验中的表现。因此,我们使用我们的数据集展示了Elias-Hartman算法的实验结果。第二个结果是基于Bafna和Pevzner[1] 1.5近似算法的算法描述。我们的算法使用了一组启发式方法,使我们能够提高原始算法的解质量,但保持原始的1.5近似比。我们将我们的实验结果与迄今为止发表的最佳结果进行了比较。结果表明,该算法在实际应用中具有较好的性能。解质量分析还表明,尽管近似比存在,但我们的算法在长排列上优于Elias和Hartman的1.375近似算法。提出了一种求解变换距离问题的算法。对于|π| = 9,我们的算法是第一个通过转置对任意排列π进行排序的多项式时间算法。当π < 11时,我们的算法优于其他使用π序列的算法。我们还证明了我们的算法在较长的排列上保持了良好的性能。我们声称,在这项工作中提出的启发式有助于发现通过换位排序的复杂性,这仍然是开放的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extending Bafna-Pevzner algorithm
Genome Rearrangement is a field that addresses the problem of finding the minimum number of global operations, such as transpositions, reversals, fusions and fissions that transform a given genome into another. In this work we deal with transposition events, which are events that change the position of two contiguous block of genes in the same chromosome. Some approximation algorithms for this problem were published so far. Bafna and Pevzner [1] proposed the first 1.5-approximation algorithm for the transposition distance problem and recently Elias and Hartman [4] delineated a 1.375-approximation algorithm, which is currently the best performance ratio known. Many other algorithms achieve good performance on experimental results and provide new insights to solve the problem [2, 5, 8, 9, 11]. In this paper we present two main results. The first result is the implementation of the 1.375-algorithm described by Elias and Hartman [4]. We also compared the experimental results from Elias-Hartman algorithm with other approaches. It is important to realize that no implementation of Elias-Hartman algorithm was provided before this work and the approximation proof was assisted by a computer program. Although the approximation ratio is an important issue, we need to know how the algorithm behaves on practical experiments. For this reason, we show the experimental results of Elias-Hartman algorithm using our datasets. The second result is the description of our algorithm based on Bafna and Pevzner [1] 1.5-approximation algorithm. Our algorithm uses a set of heuristics that allowed us to improve the solution quality of the original algorithm, but keeping the original 1.5-approximation ratio. We compare our experimental results with the best results published so far. The results indicate that our algorithm performs best in practice. The solution quality analysis also shows that our algorithm outperforms Elias and Hartman 1.375-approximation algorithm on longer permutations, despite the approximation ratio. We delineate an algorithm for the transposition distance problem. Our algorithm is the first polynomial time algorithm that sorts by transposition any permutation π, for |π| = 9. We show that our algorithm is better than the other algorithms using sequences π, for π < 11. We also show that our algorithm keeps the good performance on longer permutations. We claim that the heuristics proposed in this work contribute for discovering the complexity of sorting by transposition, which remains open.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
In Silico Biology
In Silico Biology Computer Science-Computational Theory and Mathematics
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The considerable "algorithmic complexity" of biological systems requires a huge amount of detailed information for their complete description. Although far from being complete, the overwhelming quantity of small pieces of information gathered for all kind of biological systems at the molecular and cellular level requires computational tools to be adequately stored and interpreted. Interpretation of data means to abstract them as much as allowed to provide a systematic, an integrative view of biology. Most of the presently available scientific journals focus either on accumulating more data from elaborate experimental approaches, or on presenting new algorithms for the interpretation of these data. Both approaches are meritorious.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信