{"title":"心理学控制论基础","authors":"B. Scott","doi":"10.1142/9789813226265_0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"> Context • The field of psychology consists of many specialist domains of activity, which lack shared foundations. This means that the field as a whole lacks conceptual coherence. > Problem • The aim of the article is to show how secondorder cybernetics can provide both foundations and a unifying conceptual framework for psychology. > Method • The field of psychology is overviewed. There is then a demonstration of how cybernetics can provide both foundations and a unifying conceptual framework. This entails defining some key cybernetics concepts and showing how they have already permeated the field, largely implicitly, and showing how, when made explicit, they can unify the field. > Results • I show how concepts from second-order cybernetics can unify “process” and “person” approaches within psychology and can also unify individual psychology and social psychology, a unification that also builds conceptual bridges with sociology. > Implications • The results are of value for bringing order to an otherwise inchoate field. They afford better communication between those working in the field, which is likely to give rise to new research questions and more effective ways of tackling them. > Constructivist content • Central to the article is a reliance on concepts taken from the constructivist perspective of second-order cybernetics. >","PeriodicalId":39075,"journal":{"name":"Constructivist Foundations","volume":"11 1","pages":"509-517"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/9789813226265_0017","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cybernetic Foundations for Psychology\",\"authors\":\"B. Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/9789813226265_0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"> Context • The field of psychology consists of many specialist domains of activity, which lack shared foundations. This means that the field as a whole lacks conceptual coherence. > Problem • The aim of the article is to show how secondorder cybernetics can provide both foundations and a unifying conceptual framework for psychology. > Method • The field of psychology is overviewed. There is then a demonstration of how cybernetics can provide both foundations and a unifying conceptual framework. This entails defining some key cybernetics concepts and showing how they have already permeated the field, largely implicitly, and showing how, when made explicit, they can unify the field. > Results • I show how concepts from second-order cybernetics can unify “process” and “person” approaches within psychology and can also unify individual psychology and social psychology, a unification that also builds conceptual bridges with sociology. > Implications • The results are of value for bringing order to an otherwise inchoate field. They afford better communication between those working in the field, which is likely to give rise to new research questions and more effective ways of tackling them. > Constructivist content • Central to the article is a reliance on concepts taken from the constructivist perspective of second-order cybernetics. >\",\"PeriodicalId\":39075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Constructivist Foundations\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"509-517\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/9789813226265_0017\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Constructivist Foundations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813226265_0017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constructivist Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813226265_0017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
> Context • The field of psychology consists of many specialist domains of activity, which lack shared foundations. This means that the field as a whole lacks conceptual coherence. > Problem • The aim of the article is to show how secondorder cybernetics can provide both foundations and a unifying conceptual framework for psychology. > Method • The field of psychology is overviewed. There is then a demonstration of how cybernetics can provide both foundations and a unifying conceptual framework. This entails defining some key cybernetics concepts and showing how they have already permeated the field, largely implicitly, and showing how, when made explicit, they can unify the field. > Results • I show how concepts from second-order cybernetics can unify “process” and “person” approaches within psychology and can also unify individual psychology and social psychology, a unification that also builds conceptual bridges with sociology. > Implications • The results are of value for bringing order to an otherwise inchoate field. They afford better communication between those working in the field, which is likely to give rise to new research questions and more effective ways of tackling them. > Constructivist content • Central to the article is a reliance on concepts taken from the constructivist perspective of second-order cybernetics. >
期刊介绍:
Constructivist Foundations (CF) is an international peer-reviewed e-journal focusing on the multidisciplinary study of the philosophical and scientific foundations and applications of constructivism and related disciplines. The journal promotes interdisciplinary discussion and cooperation among researchers and theorists working in many diverse fields such as artificial intelligence, cognitive science, biology, neuroscience, psychology, educational research, linguistics, communication science, sociology, mathematics, computer science, and philosophy. Constructivist approaches covered in the journal include the theory of autopoietic systems, enactivism, radical constructivism, second-order cybernetics, neurophenomenology, constructionism, and non-dualizing philosophy.