行星环形山多个撞击体种群的问题:月球证据

W. Hartmann
{"title":"行星环形山多个撞击体种群的问题:月球证据","authors":"W. Hartmann","doi":"10.1111/J.1945-5100.1995.TB01152.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"— This paper addresses several current issues related to use of craters in interpreting planetary surface histories. The primary goal is to test the widely adopted hypothesis of multiple populations of impactors at different times or places in the Solar System. \n \n \n \nNew data presented here revise a “lunar highland” crater diameter distribution that has been widely used as evidence of an early distinct population of impactors. This curve, which has a depression of the size distribution at mid-sizes, does not, in fact, represent the lunar highlands generally. I show that it is associated with regions of intercrater plains. The more extensive the obliteration by intercrater plains, the deeper the depression. Modeling indicates that the depression of the curve is caused by the obliteration process itself. The oldest, most cratered regions of lunar highlands do not show the depression. \n \n \n \nThese findings call into question earlier interpretations of multiple populations of impactors in the Solar System and of a distinctive primordial population. \n \n \n \nThe present work is consistent, instead, with (1) a relatively uniform size distribution of interplanetary impactors, of mixed origins, back to 4 Ga ago and throughout the sampled Solar System; (2) fragmentation as the process that produced that size distribution; (3) saturation equilibrium on the most heavily cratered surfaces; and (4) differences in structure in the size distribution caused not by distinct impactor populations but by episodes of endogenic obliteration. \n \n \n \nIf accepted, these results would modify some studies of solar system evolution, including assertions of two to five distinct populations of impactors, assumptions of lack of saturation equilibrium, and identifications of specific heliocentric or planetocentric sources for impactors within outer planet satellite systems.","PeriodicalId":81993,"journal":{"name":"Meteoritics","volume":"30 1","pages":"451-467"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1945-5100.1995.TB01152.X","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planetary cratering 1. The question of multiple impactor populations: Lunar evidence\",\"authors\":\"W. Hartmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1945-5100.1995.TB01152.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"— This paper addresses several current issues related to use of craters in interpreting planetary surface histories. The primary goal is to test the widely adopted hypothesis of multiple populations of impactors at different times or places in the Solar System. \\n \\n \\n \\nNew data presented here revise a “lunar highland” crater diameter distribution that has been widely used as evidence of an early distinct population of impactors. This curve, which has a depression of the size distribution at mid-sizes, does not, in fact, represent the lunar highlands generally. I show that it is associated with regions of intercrater plains. The more extensive the obliteration by intercrater plains, the deeper the depression. Modeling indicates that the depression of the curve is caused by the obliteration process itself. The oldest, most cratered regions of lunar highlands do not show the depression. \\n \\n \\n \\nThese findings call into question earlier interpretations of multiple populations of impactors in the Solar System and of a distinctive primordial population. \\n \\n \\n \\nThe present work is consistent, instead, with (1) a relatively uniform size distribution of interplanetary impactors, of mixed origins, back to 4 Ga ago and throughout the sampled Solar System; (2) fragmentation as the process that produced that size distribution; (3) saturation equilibrium on the most heavily cratered surfaces; and (4) differences in structure in the size distribution caused not by distinct impactor populations but by episodes of endogenic obliteration. \\n \\n \\n \\nIf accepted, these results would modify some studies of solar system evolution, including assertions of two to five distinct populations of impactors, assumptions of lack of saturation equilibrium, and identifications of specific heliocentric or planetocentric sources for impactors within outer planet satellite systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meteoritics\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"451-467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1945-5100.1995.TB01152.X\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meteoritics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1945-5100.1995.TB01152.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meteoritics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1945-5100.1995.TB01152.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

摘要

-本文解决了几个与使用陨石坑解释行星表面历史相关的当前问题。主要目标是测试一个被广泛接受的假设,即在太阳系的不同时间或地点有多群撞击者。这里提出的新数据修正了“月球高地”陨石坑直径分布,该分布被广泛用作早期不同撞击物种群的证据。这条曲线在大小分布上有一个中等大小的凹陷,实际上并不代表月球高地的总体情况。我认为它与陨石坑间平原地区有关。陨石坑间平原的湮没越广泛,凹陷就越深。模型分析表明,曲线的下陷是由湮没过程本身引起的。月球高地上最古老、陨石坑最多的地区没有显示出洼地。这些发现对早先对太阳系中多个撞击天体种群和一个独特的原始种群的解释提出了质疑。相反,目前的工作与(1)星际撞击物的相对均匀的大小分布是一致的,混合起源,可以追溯到4亿年以前,并在整个取样的太阳系中;(2)破碎化是产生这种粒度分布的过程;(3)最严重陨石坑表面的饱和平衡;(4)大小分布的结构差异不是由不同的撞击者种群造成的,而是由内源湮没事件引起的。如果被接受,这些结果将修正一些关于太阳系演化的研究,包括两到五个不同的撞击物种群的断言,缺乏饱和平衡的假设,以及确定外行星卫星系统中撞击物的特定日心或行星中心来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Planetary cratering 1. The question of multiple impactor populations: Lunar evidence
— This paper addresses several current issues related to use of craters in interpreting planetary surface histories. The primary goal is to test the widely adopted hypothesis of multiple populations of impactors at different times or places in the Solar System. New data presented here revise a “lunar highland” crater diameter distribution that has been widely used as evidence of an early distinct population of impactors. This curve, which has a depression of the size distribution at mid-sizes, does not, in fact, represent the lunar highlands generally. I show that it is associated with regions of intercrater plains. The more extensive the obliteration by intercrater plains, the deeper the depression. Modeling indicates that the depression of the curve is caused by the obliteration process itself. The oldest, most cratered regions of lunar highlands do not show the depression. These findings call into question earlier interpretations of multiple populations of impactors in the Solar System and of a distinctive primordial population. The present work is consistent, instead, with (1) a relatively uniform size distribution of interplanetary impactors, of mixed origins, back to 4 Ga ago and throughout the sampled Solar System; (2) fragmentation as the process that produced that size distribution; (3) saturation equilibrium on the most heavily cratered surfaces; and (4) differences in structure in the size distribution caused not by distinct impactor populations but by episodes of endogenic obliteration. If accepted, these results would modify some studies of solar system evolution, including assertions of two to five distinct populations of impactors, assumptions of lack of saturation equilibrium, and identifications of specific heliocentric or planetocentric sources for impactors within outer planet satellite systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信