气管内吸痰压力调节设置系统评价。

D. Arbon, Dora Lang Siew Ping, J. Lumby, C. Tufanaru
{"title":"气管内吸痰压力调节设置系统评价。","authors":"D. Arbon, Dora Lang Siew Ping, J. Lumby, C. Tufanaru","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2011-337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Review Objective \nThe principle objective of this review will be to critically appraise and present the best available evidence for setting different levels of vacuum / suction pressures when patients are receiving endotracheal suctioning. \nSpecifically the review will seek to answer the following questions. \nWhat is the best evidence for regulating vacuum pressure in the performance of endotracheal suctioning? \nWhat is the best evidence for regulating vacuum pressure for endotracheal suction as opposed to setting no regulated pressure in the performance of endotracheal suctioning? \nWhat is the best evidence for a limit to which vacuum should be regulated for endotracheal \nsuction? \nTo what extent does the developed airflow impact on the safety and effectiveness of the suction apparatus? \n \nInclusion Criteria \nTypes of Participants \nPatients receiving mechanical ventilator support through endotracheal tube or tracheostomy in the acute care setting. \n \nParticipants may present with a variety of pathologies but studies will not be excluded on the bases of diagnosis. \n \nPatients may require intubation and endotracheal suctioning at any age; vacuum applied in the performance of suction may have health implications and be of interest to the clinician. \nPapers regarding either spontaneously breathing and/or machine ventilated subjects will be also included so long as the participants require endotracheal suctioning in the acute stage of their hospitalisation. \n \nTypes of intervention / Phenomena of interest \nThe setting of a level of vacuum / suction pressure, taking into account the developed flow, to facilitate safe endotracheal suctioning in the acute care setting of the Intensive Care unit, High Dependency or Emergency Area will be examined. \n \nTypes of outcomes \nOutcomes related to mortality, morbidity, and health benefits of regulating suction / vacuum pressure as opposed to having no regulation, i.e. Using the unguarded wall outlet, will be sought. \n \nThe effects of negative pressure within the tracheo-bronchial tree including Atelectasis; Reported and shown by radiological exam as early as the 1940’s Pulmonary haemorrhage has been seen with rapid decompression of segmental lung, with mechanical trauma from catheter impaction or sudden explosive decompression. \n \nTRUNCATED AT 350 WORDS","PeriodicalId":91723,"journal":{"name":"JBI library of systematic reviews","volume":"9 16 Suppl 1","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11124/JBISRIR-2011-337","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Setting a Regulated Suction Pressure for Endotracheal Suctioning; A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"D. Arbon, Dora Lang Siew Ping, J. Lumby, C. Tufanaru\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBISRIR-2011-337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Review Objective \\nThe principle objective of this review will be to critically appraise and present the best available evidence for setting different levels of vacuum / suction pressures when patients are receiving endotracheal suctioning. \\nSpecifically the review will seek to answer the following questions. \\nWhat is the best evidence for regulating vacuum pressure in the performance of endotracheal suctioning? \\nWhat is the best evidence for regulating vacuum pressure for endotracheal suction as opposed to setting no regulated pressure in the performance of endotracheal suctioning? \\nWhat is the best evidence for a limit to which vacuum should be regulated for endotracheal \\nsuction? \\nTo what extent does the developed airflow impact on the safety and effectiveness of the suction apparatus? \\n \\nInclusion Criteria \\nTypes of Participants \\nPatients receiving mechanical ventilator support through endotracheal tube or tracheostomy in the acute care setting. \\n \\nParticipants may present with a variety of pathologies but studies will not be excluded on the bases of diagnosis. \\n \\nPatients may require intubation and endotracheal suctioning at any age; vacuum applied in the performance of suction may have health implications and be of interest to the clinician. \\nPapers regarding either spontaneously breathing and/or machine ventilated subjects will be also included so long as the participants require endotracheal suctioning in the acute stage of their hospitalisation. \\n \\nTypes of intervention / Phenomena of interest \\nThe setting of a level of vacuum / suction pressure, taking into account the developed flow, to facilitate safe endotracheal suctioning in the acute care setting of the Intensive Care unit, High Dependency or Emergency Area will be examined. \\n \\nTypes of outcomes \\nOutcomes related to mortality, morbidity, and health benefits of regulating suction / vacuum pressure as opposed to having no regulation, i.e. Using the unguarded wall outlet, will be sought. \\n \\nThe effects of negative pressure within the tracheo-bronchial tree including Atelectasis; Reported and shown by radiological exam as early as the 1940’s Pulmonary haemorrhage has been seen with rapid decompression of segmental lung, with mechanical trauma from catheter impaction or sudden explosive decompression. \\n \\nTRUNCATED AT 350 WORDS\",\"PeriodicalId\":91723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI library of systematic reviews\",\"volume\":\"9 16 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11124/JBISRIR-2011-337\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI library of systematic reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2011-337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI library of systematic reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2011-337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本综述的主要目的是对患者接受气管内吸引时设置不同水平的真空/吸引压力进行批判性评估,并提供现有的最佳证据。具体来说,审查将寻求回答下列问题。调节真空压力对气管内吸引效果的最佳证据是什么?调节气管内抽吸的真空压力,而不是在气管内抽吸过程中设置无调节压力,最好的证据是什么?气管内吸吸的真空度应该控制在什么限度,最好的证据是什么?产生的气流在多大程度上影响了吸力装置的安全性和有效性?纳入标准参与者类型在急症护理环境中通过气管内插管或气管造口术接受机械呼吸机支持的患者。参与者可能表现出各种病理,但不会因诊断而排除研究。患者在任何年龄都可能需要插管和气管内吸引;真空应用于吸力的性能可能有健康的影响,是感兴趣的临床医生。关于自主呼吸和/或机器通气受试者的论文也将包括在内,只要参与者在其住院的急性阶段需要气管内吸引。干预类型/感兴趣的现象:考虑到发达的流量,将检查在重症监护室、高度依赖或急诊区的急性护理环境中,为促进安全的气管内吸引而设置的真空/吸引压力水平。将寻求与调节吸力/真空压力相对于不调节(即使用不设防的壁出口)的死亡率、发病率和健康益处相关的结果。气管-支气管树内负压的影响包括肺不张;早在20世纪40年代的报道和放射学检查显示,肺出血见于节段性肺快速减压,导管嵌塞或突然爆发性减压造成的机械创伤。删节为350字
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Setting a Regulated Suction Pressure for Endotracheal Suctioning; A Systematic Review.
Review Objective The principle objective of this review will be to critically appraise and present the best available evidence for setting different levels of vacuum / suction pressures when patients are receiving endotracheal suctioning. Specifically the review will seek to answer the following questions. What is the best evidence for regulating vacuum pressure in the performance of endotracheal suctioning? What is the best evidence for regulating vacuum pressure for endotracheal suction as opposed to setting no regulated pressure in the performance of endotracheal suctioning? What is the best evidence for a limit to which vacuum should be regulated for endotracheal suction? To what extent does the developed airflow impact on the safety and effectiveness of the suction apparatus? Inclusion Criteria Types of Participants Patients receiving mechanical ventilator support through endotracheal tube or tracheostomy in the acute care setting. Participants may present with a variety of pathologies but studies will not be excluded on the bases of diagnosis. Patients may require intubation and endotracheal suctioning at any age; vacuum applied in the performance of suction may have health implications and be of interest to the clinician. Papers regarding either spontaneously breathing and/or machine ventilated subjects will be also included so long as the participants require endotracheal suctioning in the acute stage of their hospitalisation. Types of intervention / Phenomena of interest The setting of a level of vacuum / suction pressure, taking into account the developed flow, to facilitate safe endotracheal suctioning in the acute care setting of the Intensive Care unit, High Dependency or Emergency Area will be examined. Types of outcomes Outcomes related to mortality, morbidity, and health benefits of regulating suction / vacuum pressure as opposed to having no regulation, i.e. Using the unguarded wall outlet, will be sought. The effects of negative pressure within the tracheo-bronchial tree including Atelectasis; Reported and shown by radiological exam as early as the 1940’s Pulmonary haemorrhage has been seen with rapid decompression of segmental lung, with mechanical trauma from catheter impaction or sudden explosive decompression. TRUNCATED AT 350 WORDS
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信