心理社会干预对接受化疗的癌症患者认知功能障碍的有效性:一项系统综述。

S. Hines, Shannon Pike, Mary‐Anne Ramis, A. Chang
{"title":"心理社会干预对接受化疗的癌症患者认知功能障碍的有效性:一项系统综述。","authors":"S. Hines, Shannon Pike, Mary‐Anne Ramis, A. Chang","doi":"10.11124/01938924-201109490-00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nThe objective of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions designed to treat CRCD. The primary outcome assessed will be cognitive function, as measured by a reliable and valid tool. Because CRCD has been strongly linked to Quality of Life (QoL), a secondary outcome to be assessed is whether any of the interventions studied demonstrate improvements in QoL for this patient population. \n \nCriteria for considering studies for this review \n \nTypes of participants \nThis review will include studies with patients aged 18 or over who were diagnosed with cancer and received chemotherapy as part of their treatment. Patients may be of either sex, and have any primary site of cancer. Patients may be receiving chemotherapy at the time of the intervention studied, or (because some people experience CRCD after treatment with chemotherapy has finished), their exposure to chemotherapy may have occurred in the past. \n \nThe review will exclude studies if their participants are under the age of 18, or have had any diagnosed cognitive dysfunction prior to receiving chemotherapy. Patients younger than 18 can face different medical and psychosocial issues when diagnosed with cancer; as such, they have distinctive medical and psychosocial needs which necessitate age-appropriate therapy. Interventions designed for adults may be inappropriate for this group. \n \nTypes of interventions \nThis review will consider psychosocial interventions designed to improve cognitive functioning amongst patients who have received, or are receiving, chemotherapy as a treatment for cancer. These interventions may include: \nCognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT); \nPsychological counselling; or \nEducation on compensatory techniques for CRCD. \n \nStudies investigating only pharmacological interventions to improve cognitive functioning will be excluded. Studies that investigate both psychological and pharmacological interventions will be assessed for their suitability for inclusion, though only the data dealing with non pharmacological interventions will be reported. \n \nTypes of outcome measures \nThe primary outcome of interest for this study is the level of cognitive dysfunction, as measured by any reliable and validated scale, including but not limited to the Multiple Ability Self-Report Questionnaire (the MASQ) and neuropsychological tests like the California Verbal Learning Test-II. TRUNCATED AT 350 WORDS.","PeriodicalId":91723,"journal":{"name":"JBI library of systematic reviews","volume":"99 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for cognitive dysfunction in cancer patients who have received chemotherapy: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"S. Hines, Shannon Pike, Mary‐Anne Ramis, A. Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/01938924-201109490-00001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nThe objective of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions designed to treat CRCD. The primary outcome assessed will be cognitive function, as measured by a reliable and valid tool. Because CRCD has been strongly linked to Quality of Life (QoL), a secondary outcome to be assessed is whether any of the interventions studied demonstrate improvements in QoL for this patient population. \\n \\nCriteria for considering studies for this review \\n \\nTypes of participants \\nThis review will include studies with patients aged 18 or over who were diagnosed with cancer and received chemotherapy as part of their treatment. Patients may be of either sex, and have any primary site of cancer. Patients may be receiving chemotherapy at the time of the intervention studied, or (because some people experience CRCD after treatment with chemotherapy has finished), their exposure to chemotherapy may have occurred in the past. \\n \\nThe review will exclude studies if their participants are under the age of 18, or have had any diagnosed cognitive dysfunction prior to receiving chemotherapy. Patients younger than 18 can face different medical and psychosocial issues when diagnosed with cancer; as such, they have distinctive medical and psychosocial needs which necessitate age-appropriate therapy. Interventions designed for adults may be inappropriate for this group. \\n \\nTypes of interventions \\nThis review will consider psychosocial interventions designed to improve cognitive functioning amongst patients who have received, or are receiving, chemotherapy as a treatment for cancer. These interventions may include: \\nCognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT); \\nPsychological counselling; or \\nEducation on compensatory techniques for CRCD. \\n \\nStudies investigating only pharmacological interventions to improve cognitive functioning will be excluded. Studies that investigate both psychological and pharmacological interventions will be assessed for their suitability for inclusion, though only the data dealing with non pharmacological interventions will be reported. \\n \\nTypes of outcome measures \\nThe primary outcome of interest for this study is the level of cognitive dysfunction, as measured by any reliable and validated scale, including but not limited to the Multiple Ability Self-Report Questionnaire (the MASQ) and neuropsychological tests like the California Verbal Learning Test-II. TRUNCATED AT 350 WORDS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI library of systematic reviews\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI library of systematic reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/01938924-201109490-00001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI library of systematic reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/01938924-201109490-00001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述的目的是评估心理社会干预治疗CRCD的有效性。评估的主要结果将是认知功能,通过可靠和有效的工具来测量。由于CRCD与生活质量(QoL)密切相关,需要评估的次要结果是所研究的任何干预措施是否证明改善了该患者群体的生活质量。本综述考虑研究的标准受试者类型本综述将包括年龄在18岁或以上的被诊断为癌症并接受化疗作为其治疗的一部分的患者。患者可以是任何性别,并且有任何原发部位的癌症。在研究干预时,患者可能正在接受化疗,或者(因为有些人在化疗结束后经历了CRCD),他们可能在过去接触过化疗。如果参与者年龄在18岁以下,或者在接受化疗前有任何诊断出的认知功能障碍,则该研究将被排除在外。18岁以下的患者在被诊断患有癌症时可能面临不同的医疗和社会心理问题;因此,他们有独特的医疗和社会心理需求,需要适合他们年龄的治疗。为成年人设计的干预措施可能不适合这一群体。本综述将考虑旨在改善接受或正在接受化疗的癌症患者认知功能的心理社会干预措施。这些干预措施可能包括:认知行为疗法(CBT);心理辅导;或对CRCD的补偿技术进行教育。仅调查药物干预以改善认知功能的研究将被排除在外。调查心理和药物干预的研究将被评估其是否适合纳入,尽管只有涉及非药物干预的数据将被报道。本研究的主要结果是认知功能障碍的水平,通过任何可靠和有效的量表来测量,包括但不限于多重能力自我报告问卷(MASQ)和神经心理学测试,如加州语言学习测试- ii。删节为350字。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for cognitive dysfunction in cancer patients who have received chemotherapy: a systematic review.
Objective The objective of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions designed to treat CRCD. The primary outcome assessed will be cognitive function, as measured by a reliable and valid tool. Because CRCD has been strongly linked to Quality of Life (QoL), a secondary outcome to be assessed is whether any of the interventions studied demonstrate improvements in QoL for this patient population. Criteria for considering studies for this review Types of participants This review will include studies with patients aged 18 or over who were diagnosed with cancer and received chemotherapy as part of their treatment. Patients may be of either sex, and have any primary site of cancer. Patients may be receiving chemotherapy at the time of the intervention studied, or (because some people experience CRCD after treatment with chemotherapy has finished), their exposure to chemotherapy may have occurred in the past. The review will exclude studies if their participants are under the age of 18, or have had any diagnosed cognitive dysfunction prior to receiving chemotherapy. Patients younger than 18 can face different medical and psychosocial issues when diagnosed with cancer; as such, they have distinctive medical and psychosocial needs which necessitate age-appropriate therapy. Interventions designed for adults may be inappropriate for this group. Types of interventions This review will consider psychosocial interventions designed to improve cognitive functioning amongst patients who have received, or are receiving, chemotherapy as a treatment for cancer. These interventions may include: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT); Psychological counselling; or Education on compensatory techniques for CRCD. Studies investigating only pharmacological interventions to improve cognitive functioning will be excluded. Studies that investigate both psychological and pharmacological interventions will be assessed for their suitability for inclusion, though only the data dealing with non pharmacological interventions will be reported. Types of outcome measures The primary outcome of interest for this study is the level of cognitive dysfunction, as measured by any reliable and validated scale, including but not limited to the Multiple Ability Self-Report Questionnaire (the MASQ) and neuropsychological tests like the California Verbal Learning Test-II. TRUNCATED AT 350 WORDS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信