护士主导心脏门诊治疗成年冠心病患者效果的系统综述

Verena Schadewaldt, T. Schultz
{"title":"护士主导心脏门诊治疗成年冠心病患者效果的系统综述","authors":"Verena Schadewaldt, T. Schultz","doi":"10.11124/01938924-201008020-00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim Nurse‐led clinics offer the possibility of patient education, support and continuity of care for patients with Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) to address and reduce risk factors. The objective of this review is to present the best available evidence related to nurse‐led cardiac clinics for adults with CHD by updating an existing systematic review. Methods Twenty databases for published literature and 11 databases or websites for unpublished literature were searched for the period September 2002 to March 2008. Additionally, reference lists of retrieved articles were reviewed and relevant journals were hand searched. Assessment for methodological quality, data extraction and synthesis was undertaken using a systematic review management tool (JBI‐SUMARI). Results Seven RCTs formed the basis for this systematic review, however, in many cases meta‐analysis was not possible because of a lack of relevant data. The major nurse‐led intervention applied in the clinics consisted of health promotion through educating and counselling the patients. There were no harmful effects on patients with CHD identified when exposed to a nurse‐led clinic. Few risk factors were significantly reduced by attending nurse‐led clinic, but particular in the long‐term no success in risk factor reduction was achieved. Difficulties were obvious in modifying behaviour changes concerning smoking cessation and diet adherence. Nurse‐led clinics may positively influence perceived quality of life and general health status, especially physical functioning. Conclusion The results indicated that care was equivalent to non‐nurse led clinics, and there was no greater risk of poorer outcomes in the nurse‐led clinics. The effectiveness of clinics might be dependent on the intensity of the nursing support. The combination of counselling and regular assessment of risk factors and health status delivered at nurse‐led clinics is supported by the available research, and given that outcomes were in general equivalent between nurse‐led and other clinics, further research should investigate the cost effectiveness of the different models of care. Implication for practice Before establishing a nurse‐led clinic appropriate qualification and responsibilities, as well as the particular structure of the health care system and funding possibilities have to be considered. Implication for research Additional research on the effectiveness of selected interventions in nurse‐led clinics is necessary. A systematic review on cost‐effectiveness should be undertaken.","PeriodicalId":91723,"journal":{"name":"JBI library of systematic reviews","volume":"6 Suppl 8S 1","pages":"53–89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review on the effectiveness of nurse-led cardiac clinics for adult patients with coronary heart disease.\",\"authors\":\"Verena Schadewaldt, T. Schultz\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/01938924-201008020-00001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim Nurse‐led clinics offer the possibility of patient education, support and continuity of care for patients with Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) to address and reduce risk factors. The objective of this review is to present the best available evidence related to nurse‐led cardiac clinics for adults with CHD by updating an existing systematic review. Methods Twenty databases for published literature and 11 databases or websites for unpublished literature were searched for the period September 2002 to March 2008. Additionally, reference lists of retrieved articles were reviewed and relevant journals were hand searched. Assessment for methodological quality, data extraction and synthesis was undertaken using a systematic review management tool (JBI‐SUMARI). Results Seven RCTs formed the basis for this systematic review, however, in many cases meta‐analysis was not possible because of a lack of relevant data. The major nurse‐led intervention applied in the clinics consisted of health promotion through educating and counselling the patients. There were no harmful effects on patients with CHD identified when exposed to a nurse‐led clinic. Few risk factors were significantly reduced by attending nurse‐led clinic, but particular in the long‐term no success in risk factor reduction was achieved. Difficulties were obvious in modifying behaviour changes concerning smoking cessation and diet adherence. Nurse‐led clinics may positively influence perceived quality of life and general health status, especially physical functioning. Conclusion The results indicated that care was equivalent to non‐nurse led clinics, and there was no greater risk of poorer outcomes in the nurse‐led clinics. The effectiveness of clinics might be dependent on the intensity of the nursing support. The combination of counselling and regular assessment of risk factors and health status delivered at nurse‐led clinics is supported by the available research, and given that outcomes were in general equivalent between nurse‐led and other clinics, further research should investigate the cost effectiveness of the different models of care. Implication for practice Before establishing a nurse‐led clinic appropriate qualification and responsibilities, as well as the particular structure of the health care system and funding possibilities have to be considered. Implication for research Additional research on the effectiveness of selected interventions in nurse‐led clinics is necessary. A systematic review on cost‐effectiveness should be undertaken.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI library of systematic reviews\",\"volume\":\"6 Suppl 8S 1\",\"pages\":\"53–89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI library of systematic reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/01938924-201008020-00001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI library of systematic reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/01938924-201008020-00001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

回顾问题/目的回顾问题是:与其他诊所的干预措施相比,护士领导的心脏病诊所对成年冠心病患者的护理效果如何?定量目标是确定护士主导的心脏诊所对成年冠心病患者的有效性。更具体地说,目的是确定心脏病护士提供的干预措施在以下方面最有效:•再入院率•冠心病症状恶化•减少风险因素•患者满意度和与风险因素减少和生活方式改变相关的依从性。纳入标准参与者类型本综述将纳入到心脏病护士领导的诊所就诊的患有新发或现有冠心病的成人(年龄在bb0 - 18岁)。干预措施的类型审查将考虑护士主导的心脏病诊所,定义为为顾客提供服务的诊所,该诊所完全由护士管理和配备人员,具有评估、治疗、咨询或根据要求将消费者转介到其他健康学科的能力。感兴趣的干预措施是那些与护士管理的心脏诊所工作人员的共同作用有关的干预措施,包括教育、评估和监测、咨询、转诊和行政职责。护士领导的诊所将与任何其他形式的诊所进行比较,这些诊所不是在完全由护士领导的环境中进行的,例如。在医院、诊所或保健中心提供的护理,由护士以外的保健专业人员提供护理。本综述要考虑的主要结局是:•冠心病症状或心绞痛发作的恶化,•再入院率和入院率,•危险因素(血脂、血压、一般健康状况)的降低,•消费者满意度和•依从性(如冠心病药物的推荐管理、危险因素管理和干预措施的依从性或吸烟、体重管理、运动和饮食等相关行为的改变)。例如,可以通过关于生活方式改变、吸烟和运动行为的调查问卷来衡量结果,并通过调查或审计医疗记录来评估营养和生活质量。如果可能的话,他们将细分为短期(最多6个月)和长期(从7个月以上)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review on the effectiveness of nurse-led cardiac clinics for adult patients with coronary heart disease.
Aim Nurse‐led clinics offer the possibility of patient education, support and continuity of care for patients with Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) to address and reduce risk factors. The objective of this review is to present the best available evidence related to nurse‐led cardiac clinics for adults with CHD by updating an existing systematic review. Methods Twenty databases for published literature and 11 databases or websites for unpublished literature were searched for the period September 2002 to March 2008. Additionally, reference lists of retrieved articles were reviewed and relevant journals were hand searched. Assessment for methodological quality, data extraction and synthesis was undertaken using a systematic review management tool (JBI‐SUMARI). Results Seven RCTs formed the basis for this systematic review, however, in many cases meta‐analysis was not possible because of a lack of relevant data. The major nurse‐led intervention applied in the clinics consisted of health promotion through educating and counselling the patients. There were no harmful effects on patients with CHD identified when exposed to a nurse‐led clinic. Few risk factors were significantly reduced by attending nurse‐led clinic, but particular in the long‐term no success in risk factor reduction was achieved. Difficulties were obvious in modifying behaviour changes concerning smoking cessation and diet adherence. Nurse‐led clinics may positively influence perceived quality of life and general health status, especially physical functioning. Conclusion The results indicated that care was equivalent to non‐nurse led clinics, and there was no greater risk of poorer outcomes in the nurse‐led clinics. The effectiveness of clinics might be dependent on the intensity of the nursing support. The combination of counselling and regular assessment of risk factors and health status delivered at nurse‐led clinics is supported by the available research, and given that outcomes were in general equivalent between nurse‐led and other clinics, further research should investigate the cost effectiveness of the different models of care. Implication for practice Before establishing a nurse‐led clinic appropriate qualification and responsibilities, as well as the particular structure of the health care system and funding possibilities have to be considered. Implication for research Additional research on the effectiveness of selected interventions in nurse‐led clinics is necessary. A systematic review on cost‐effectiveness should be undertaken.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信