E. CHASSEIGNAUX, Y. MICHEL, M.-T. TOQUIN, G. ERMEL, G. SALVAT, P. COLIN
{"title":"生禽加工自然污染环境中标准程序快速检测单核细胞增生李斯特菌的两种方法比较","authors":"E. CHASSEIGNAUX, Y. MICHEL, M.-T. TOQUIN, G. ERMEL, G. SALVAT, P. COLIN","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-4581.1999.tb00384.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Abstract </b> <i>Two rapid methods (the VIDAS test, from bioMérieux and the Gen-Probe test, from AccuPROBE) were compared with a standard procedure (AFNOR V08-055) for the detection of</i> L. monocytogenes <i>in the environment of naturally contaminated raw poultry processing. Both methods were first tested with their given protocols. But as they are more adapted to food sampling than to environmental ones, these protocols were adapted. After adaptation, the results showed that these two tests performed equally well compared to the classical method.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":50067,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"7 3","pages":"147-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-4581.1999.tb00384.x","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF TWO RAPID METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES WITH A STANDARD PROCEDURE IN NATURALLY CONTAMINATED ENVIRONMENTS OF RAW POULTRY PROCESSING\",\"authors\":\"E. CHASSEIGNAUX, Y. MICHEL, M.-T. TOQUIN, G. ERMEL, G. SALVAT, P. COLIN\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1745-4581.1999.tb00384.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Abstract </b> <i>Two rapid methods (the VIDAS test, from bioMérieux and the Gen-Probe test, from AccuPROBE) were compared with a standard procedure (AFNOR V08-055) for the detection of</i> L. monocytogenes <i>in the environment of naturally contaminated raw poultry processing. Both methods were first tested with their given protocols. But as they are more adapted to food sampling than to environmental ones, these protocols were adapted. After adaptation, the results showed that these two tests performed equally well compared to the classical method.</i></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"147-153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-4581.1999.tb00384.x\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-4581.1999.tb00384.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-4581.1999.tb00384.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
COMPARISON OF TWO RAPID METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES WITH A STANDARD PROCEDURE IN NATURALLY CONTAMINATED ENVIRONMENTS OF RAW POULTRY PROCESSING
Abstract Two rapid methods (the VIDAS test, from bioMérieux and the Gen-Probe test, from AccuPROBE) were compared with a standard procedure (AFNOR V08-055) for the detection of L. monocytogenes in the environment of naturally contaminated raw poultry processing. Both methods were first tested with their given protocols. But as they are more adapted to food sampling than to environmental ones, these protocols were adapted. After adaptation, the results showed that these two tests performed equally well compared to the classical method.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
