羟乙基淀粉130/0.4与改性琥珀酰明胶对儿童心脏手术患者体积扩张的影响:对围手术期出血和输血需求的影响

KP Mulavisala, V. Kulkarni, R. Mudunuri, Voleti Venkata Raja Viswanath, J. R. Byalal, Palepu B Gopal, S. Kulkarni
{"title":"羟乙基淀粉130/0.4与改性琥珀酰明胶对儿童心脏手术患者体积扩张的影响:对围手术期出血和输血需求的影响","authors":"KP Mulavisala, V. Kulkarni, R. Mudunuri, Voleti Venkata Raja Viswanath, J. R. Byalal, Palepu B Gopal, S. Kulkarni","doi":"10.1111/J.1778-428X.2012.01169.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY \n \nVolume therapy and maintenance of stable hemodynamics is crucial in children undergoing cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The clinical use of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 is limited by the possibility of adverse hemostatic effects which could potentially increase the risk of perioperative bleeding and transfusion requirements. We conducted this study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HES in comparison with modified succinylated gelatin (MSG). Forty-nine children were randomly assigned to receive either HES (n = 28) or MSG (n = 21) during the pre-bypass period. Coagulation was assessed with thromboelastography (TEG) and the transfusion requirements up to the first postoperative day were documented. Both groups were comparable with respect to age, weight, CPB duration as well as hematological and biochemical laboratory investigations. TEG parameters were not deranged up to the first postoperative period in either group and there was a trend of reduced blood loss and transfusion requirements in HES groups although there was no statistically significant difference. Our study shows that HES 130/0.4 is safe and effective for volume replacement in pediatric cardiac surgery patients.","PeriodicalId":90375,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2012.01169.X","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 versus modified succinylated gelatin for volume expansion in pediatric cardiac surgery patients: the effects on perioperative bleeding and transfusion needs\",\"authors\":\"KP Mulavisala, V. Kulkarni, R. Mudunuri, Voleti Venkata Raja Viswanath, J. R. Byalal, Palepu B Gopal, S. Kulkarni\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1778-428X.2012.01169.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY \\n \\nVolume therapy and maintenance of stable hemodynamics is crucial in children undergoing cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The clinical use of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 is limited by the possibility of adverse hemostatic effects which could potentially increase the risk of perioperative bleeding and transfusion requirements. We conducted this study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HES in comparison with modified succinylated gelatin (MSG). Forty-nine children were randomly assigned to receive either HES (n = 28) or MSG (n = 21) during the pre-bypass period. Coagulation was assessed with thromboelastography (TEG) and the transfusion requirements up to the first postoperative day were documented. Both groups were comparable with respect to age, weight, CPB duration as well as hematological and biochemical laboratory investigations. TEG parameters were not deranged up to the first postoperative period in either group and there was a trend of reduced blood loss and transfusion requirements in HES groups although there was no statistically significant difference. Our study shows that HES 130/0.4 is safe and effective for volume replacement in pediatric cardiac surgery patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2012.01169.X\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2012.01169.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2012.01169.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在接受体外循环(CPB)心脏手术的儿童中,容量治疗和维持稳定的血流动力学至关重要。羟乙基淀粉(HES) 130/0.4的临床应用受到不良止血作用的限制,可能会增加围手术期出血和输血需求的风险。我们进行了这项研究,以评估HES与改性琥珀酰明胶(MSG)的安全性和有效性。49名儿童被随机分配在旁路术前接受HES (n = 28)或MSG (n = 21)。用血栓弹性成像(TEG)评估凝血情况,并记录术后第一天的输血需求。两组在年龄、体重、CPB持续时间以及血液学和生化实验室调查方面具有可比性。两组患者TEG参数到术后第一期均未出现紊乱,HES组患者失血量和输血需水量均有减少的趋势,但差异无统计学意义。我们的研究表明,HES 130/0.4用于儿科心脏手术患者的容量置换是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 versus modified succinylated gelatin for volume expansion in pediatric cardiac surgery patients: the effects on perioperative bleeding and transfusion needs
SUMMARY Volume therapy and maintenance of stable hemodynamics is crucial in children undergoing cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The clinical use of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 is limited by the possibility of adverse hemostatic effects which could potentially increase the risk of perioperative bleeding and transfusion requirements. We conducted this study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HES in comparison with modified succinylated gelatin (MSG). Forty-nine children were randomly assigned to receive either HES (n = 28) or MSG (n = 21) during the pre-bypass period. Coagulation was assessed with thromboelastography (TEG) and the transfusion requirements up to the first postoperative day were documented. Both groups were comparable with respect to age, weight, CPB duration as well as hematological and biochemical laboratory investigations. TEG parameters were not deranged up to the first postoperative period in either group and there was a trend of reduced blood loss and transfusion requirements in HES groups although there was no statistically significant difference. Our study shows that HES 130/0.4 is safe and effective for volume replacement in pediatric cardiac surgery patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信