血液成分致病菌灭活

C. Prowse
{"title":"血液成分致病菌灭活","authors":"C. Prowse","doi":"10.1111/J.1778-428X.2008.00113.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY \n \n \nBlood donations are screened for infectious agents of concern, but this approach is always challenged when a new infection is identified. Ideally, each donation or blood component would be treated to inactivate pathogens, as is now done for fractionated plasma products. Technology that allows this is now being developed for red cell and platelet products, and has been available for some time for whole plasma. For plasma and platelets, clinical trials have been completed and show some loss of potency as a result of treatment to reduce pathogens. Most of the methods developed arte effective against lipid-enveloped viruses and bacteria but less so for non-enveloped viruses. \n \n \n \nSome European countries have already implemented provision of pathogen-reduced plasma and are in the process of large-scale field evaluations of platelet technologies, now that these are licensed (CE marked) in Europe. As yet there is no licensed technology for pathogen reduction of red cells, and no licenses for component pathogen reduction are in place in the USA. \n \n \n \nCost-effectiveness of pathogen reduction is very poor if one bases assessment only on those pathogens for which mandatory screening is already in place, as the residual risks of infection are already very low. However, if other factors such as emerging infections, bacterial contamination or the risk of transfusion-related acute lung injury are also included in the evaluation, the economic case becomes more attractive.","PeriodicalId":90375,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM","volume":"10 1","pages":"139-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2008.00113.X","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pathogen inactivation of blood components\",\"authors\":\"C. Prowse\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1778-428X.2008.00113.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY \\n \\n \\nBlood donations are screened for infectious agents of concern, but this approach is always challenged when a new infection is identified. Ideally, each donation or blood component would be treated to inactivate pathogens, as is now done for fractionated plasma products. Technology that allows this is now being developed for red cell and platelet products, and has been available for some time for whole plasma. For plasma and platelets, clinical trials have been completed and show some loss of potency as a result of treatment to reduce pathogens. Most of the methods developed arte effective against lipid-enveloped viruses and bacteria but less so for non-enveloped viruses. \\n \\n \\n \\nSome European countries have already implemented provision of pathogen-reduced plasma and are in the process of large-scale field evaluations of platelet technologies, now that these are licensed (CE marked) in Europe. As yet there is no licensed technology for pathogen reduction of red cells, and no licenses for component pathogen reduction are in place in the USA. \\n \\n \\n \\nCost-effectiveness of pathogen reduction is very poor if one bases assessment only on those pathogens for which mandatory screening is already in place, as the residual risks of infection are already very low. However, if other factors such as emerging infections, bacterial contamination or the risk of transfusion-related acute lung injury are also included in the evaluation, the economic case becomes more attractive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"139-146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2008.00113.X\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2008.00113.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2008.00113.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

献血时要进行感染因子筛查,但当发现新的感染时,这种方法总是受到挑战。理想情况下,每次献血或血液成分都应经过处理,使病原体失活,就像现在对分离血浆产品所做的那样。目前正在开发用于红细胞和血小板产品的技术,用于全血浆的技术已经有一段时间了。对于血浆和血小板,临床试验已经完成,并显示由于减少病原体的治疗,其效力有所下降。大多数开发的方法对脂质包膜病毒和细菌有效,但对非包膜病毒效果较差。一些欧洲国家已经开始提供减少病原体的血浆,并且正在对血小板技术进行大规模的现场评估,现在这些技术已在欧洲获得许可(CE标志)。到目前为止,还没有批准红细胞病原体减少的技术,在美国也没有批准成分病原体减少的技术。由于感染的剩余风险已经很低,如果只根据已经进行强制性筛查的病原体进行评估,减少病原体的成本效益就很差。然而,如果其他因素,如新发感染、细菌污染或输血相关急性肺损伤的风险也被纳入评估,经济案例就变得更有吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pathogen inactivation of blood components
SUMMARY Blood donations are screened for infectious agents of concern, but this approach is always challenged when a new infection is identified. Ideally, each donation or blood component would be treated to inactivate pathogens, as is now done for fractionated plasma products. Technology that allows this is now being developed for red cell and platelet products, and has been available for some time for whole plasma. For plasma and platelets, clinical trials have been completed and show some loss of potency as a result of treatment to reduce pathogens. Most of the methods developed arte effective against lipid-enveloped viruses and bacteria but less so for non-enveloped viruses. Some European countries have already implemented provision of pathogen-reduced plasma and are in the process of large-scale field evaluations of platelet technologies, now that these are licensed (CE marked) in Europe. As yet there is no licensed technology for pathogen reduction of red cells, and no licenses for component pathogen reduction are in place in the USA. Cost-effectiveness of pathogen reduction is very poor if one bases assessment only on those pathogens for which mandatory screening is already in place, as the residual risks of infection are already very low. However, if other factors such as emerging infections, bacterial contamination or the risk of transfusion-related acute lung injury are also included in the evaluation, the economic case becomes more attractive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信