西班牙医院围手术期输血实践的描述性研究

M. Basora, M. Colomina, V. Moral, J. Llau, M. Vila, L. Durán, S. Silva, C. Sánchez
{"title":"西班牙医院围手术期输血实践的描述性研究","authors":"M. Basora, M. Colomina, V. Moral, J. Llau, M. Vila, L. Durán, S. Silva, C. Sánchez","doi":"10.1111/J.1778-428X.2008.00093.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY \n \n \nIn order to identify opportunities to enhance blood-sparing strategies, we studied blood-transfusion practices in patients undergoing scheduled major surgery in Spain. This prospective, multicenter epidemiological study involved 20 Spanish hospitals. We recorded the pre- and postoperative hemoglobin concentrations, the estimated and calculated blood loss, the number of patients transfused and the blood-sparing techniques used. A total of 359 patients from 18 centers were included in the analysis. Mean preoperative hemoglobin concentration was 13.7 ± 1.6 g/dL. In 29% of the patients, preoperative hemoglobin concentration was lower than 13 g/dL. All surgeries combined, mean estimated blood loss was 845 ± 659 mL and mean calculated blood loss 1722 ± 1021 mL. The percentage of patients transfused with allogeneic blood was 28.4% altogether and ranged from 47.2% in cardiac surgery patients to 4.5% in plastic-maxillofacial surgery patients. Blood-sparing techniques were used only in 70 patients (19.4%). For a large percentage patients who underwent scheduled major surgery, blood transfusion was needed and perioperative blood loss was underestimated. Blood-sparing techniques were underused in non-orthopedic surgery, despite the fact that sufficient time was available to plan appropriate blood-sparing measures.","PeriodicalId":90375,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM","volume":"10 1","pages":"9-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2008.00093.X","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Descriptive study of perioperative transfusion practices in Spanish hospitals\",\"authors\":\"M. Basora, M. Colomina, V. Moral, J. Llau, M. Vila, L. Durán, S. Silva, C. Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1778-428X.2008.00093.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY \\n \\n \\nIn order to identify opportunities to enhance blood-sparing strategies, we studied blood-transfusion practices in patients undergoing scheduled major surgery in Spain. This prospective, multicenter epidemiological study involved 20 Spanish hospitals. We recorded the pre- and postoperative hemoglobin concentrations, the estimated and calculated blood loss, the number of patients transfused and the blood-sparing techniques used. A total of 359 patients from 18 centers were included in the analysis. Mean preoperative hemoglobin concentration was 13.7 ± 1.6 g/dL. In 29% of the patients, preoperative hemoglobin concentration was lower than 13 g/dL. All surgeries combined, mean estimated blood loss was 845 ± 659 mL and mean calculated blood loss 1722 ± 1021 mL. The percentage of patients transfused with allogeneic blood was 28.4% altogether and ranged from 47.2% in cardiac surgery patients to 4.5% in plastic-maxillofacial surgery patients. Blood-sparing techniques were used only in 70 patients (19.4%). For a large percentage patients who underwent scheduled major surgery, blood transfusion was needed and perioperative blood loss was underestimated. Blood-sparing techniques were underused in non-orthopedic surgery, despite the fact that sufficient time was available to plan appropriate blood-sparing measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"9-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2008.00093.X\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2008.00093.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2008.00093.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

摘要:为了确定加强血液节约策略的机会,我们研究了西班牙接受预定大手术患者的输血实践。这项前瞻性、多中心流行病学研究涉及20家西班牙医院。我们记录了术前和术后血红蛋白浓度、估计和计算的失血量、输血患者人数和使用的血液保留技术。来自18个中心的359名患者被纳入分析。术前平均血红蛋白浓度为13.7±1.6 g/dL。29%的患者术前血红蛋白浓度低于13 g/dL。所有手术加起来,平均估计失血量为845±659 mL,平均计算失血量为1722±1021 mL。输注异体血的患者比例为28.4%,从心脏手术患者的47.2%到整形颌面外科患者的4.5%不等。仅70例(19.4%)患者使用了保血技术。有很大一部分患者接受了预定的大手术,需要输血,而围手术期的出血量被低估了。尽管有足够的时间来计划适当的血液保留措施,但血液保留技术在非骨科手术中应用不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Descriptive study of perioperative transfusion practices in Spanish hospitals
SUMMARY In order to identify opportunities to enhance blood-sparing strategies, we studied blood-transfusion practices in patients undergoing scheduled major surgery in Spain. This prospective, multicenter epidemiological study involved 20 Spanish hospitals. We recorded the pre- and postoperative hemoglobin concentrations, the estimated and calculated blood loss, the number of patients transfused and the blood-sparing techniques used. A total of 359 patients from 18 centers were included in the analysis. Mean preoperative hemoglobin concentration was 13.7 ± 1.6 g/dL. In 29% of the patients, preoperative hemoglobin concentration was lower than 13 g/dL. All surgeries combined, mean estimated blood loss was 845 ± 659 mL and mean calculated blood loss 1722 ± 1021 mL. The percentage of patients transfused with allogeneic blood was 28.4% altogether and ranged from 47.2% in cardiac surgery patients to 4.5% in plastic-maxillofacial surgery patients. Blood-sparing techniques were used only in 70 patients (19.4%). For a large percentage patients who underwent scheduled major surgery, blood transfusion was needed and perioperative blood loss was underestimated. Blood-sparing techniques were underused in non-orthopedic surgery, despite the fact that sufficient time was available to plan appropriate blood-sparing measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信