机器人是否适合在城市环境中完成麻烦和交流的任务?

Kotaro Hayashi, M. Shiomi, T. Kanda, N. Hagita
{"title":"机器人是否适合在城市环境中完成麻烦和交流的任务?","authors":"Kotaro Hayashi, M. Shiomi, T. Kanda, N. Hagita","doi":"10.1109/TAMD.2011.2178846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We studied people's acceptance of robots that per- form tasks in a city. Three different beings (a human, a human wearing a mascot costume, and a robot) performed tasks in three different scenarios: endless guidance, responding to irrational complaints, and removing an accidentally discarded key from the trash. All of these tasks involved beings interacting with visitors in troublesome situations: dull, stressful, and dirty. For this paper, 30 participants watched nine videos (three tasks performed by three beings) and evaluated each being's appropriateness for the task and its human-likeness. The results indicate that people prefer that a robot rather than a human perform these troublesome tasks, even though they require much interaction with people. In addition, comparisons with the costumed-human suggest that people's beliefs that a being deserves human rights rather than having a human-like appearance and behavior or cognitive capability is one explanation for their judgments about appropriateness.","PeriodicalId":49193,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development","volume":"4 1","pages":"150-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/TAMD.2011.2178846","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Robots Appropriate for Troublesome and Communicative Tasks in a City Environment?\",\"authors\":\"Kotaro Hayashi, M. Shiomi, T. Kanda, N. Hagita\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TAMD.2011.2178846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We studied people's acceptance of robots that per- form tasks in a city. Three different beings (a human, a human wearing a mascot costume, and a robot) performed tasks in three different scenarios: endless guidance, responding to irrational complaints, and removing an accidentally discarded key from the trash. All of these tasks involved beings interacting with visitors in troublesome situations: dull, stressful, and dirty. For this paper, 30 participants watched nine videos (three tasks performed by three beings) and evaluated each being's appropriateness for the task and its human-likeness. The results indicate that people prefer that a robot rather than a human perform these troublesome tasks, even though they require much interaction with people. In addition, comparisons with the costumed-human suggest that people's beliefs that a being deserves human rights rather than having a human-like appearance and behavior or cognitive capability is one explanation for their judgments about appropriateness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"150-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/TAMD.2011.2178846\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAMD.2011.2178846\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAMD.2011.2178846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

我们研究了人们对在城市中执行任务的机器人的接受程度。三个不同的生物(一个人,一个穿着吉祥物服装的人和一个机器人)在三个不同的场景中执行任务:无休止的指导,回应不合理的抱怨,从垃圾桶中取出不小心丢弃的钥匙。所有这些任务都涉及到生物在令人烦恼的情况下与访客互动:沉闷、紧张、肮脏。在本文中,30名参与者观看了9个视频(三个人执行的三个任务),并评估每个人对任务的适当性及其与人类的相似性。结果表明,人们更喜欢机器人而不是人类来完成这些麻烦的任务,即使它们需要与人进行很多互动。此外,与穿着服装的人的比较表明,人们认为一个人应该享有人权,而不是拥有像人一样的外表和行为或认知能力,这是他们对适当性的判断的一个解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are Robots Appropriate for Troublesome and Communicative Tasks in a City Environment?
We studied people's acceptance of robots that per- form tasks in a city. Three different beings (a human, a human wearing a mascot costume, and a robot) performed tasks in three different scenarios: endless guidance, responding to irrational complaints, and removing an accidentally discarded key from the trash. All of these tasks involved beings interacting with visitors in troublesome situations: dull, stressful, and dirty. For this paper, 30 participants watched nine videos (three tasks performed by three beings) and evaluated each being's appropriateness for the task and its human-likeness. The results indicate that people prefer that a robot rather than a human perform these troublesome tasks, even though they require much interaction with people. In addition, comparisons with the costumed-human suggest that people's beliefs that a being deserves human rights rather than having a human-like appearance and behavior or cognitive capability is one explanation for their judgments about appropriateness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development
IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-ROBOTICS
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信