临床治理:一个令人信服的质量改进策略?

M. Roland, S. Campbell, D. Wilkin
{"title":"临床治理:一个令人信服的质量改进策略?","authors":"M. Roland, S. Campbell, D. Wilkin","doi":"10.1108/02689230110403678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical governance is a new policy introduced by the UK government to improve quality of care in the National Health Service; it imposes a \"duty of quality\" on all NHS organisations, and aims to bring together managerial, organisational and clinical approaches to improving quality of care. Infrastructures have been established to support quality improvement in NHS organisations and priorities for quality improvement have been established. Initial approaches are largely educational. However, information on quality of care is starting to be shared, and experiments are being conducted with a range of financial and contractual incentives for quality improvement. For widespread cultural change to occur, a \"no blame\" approach to quality improvement will be necessary; this may be incompatible with the need to identify and eliminate bad practice. Other tensions include the rapid pace of change being centrally driven and uneven development of the infrastructure to support clinical governance. What has not yet been shown is that quality of care has improved. It is too early to say this yet. Given the magnitude both of the vision and the work required, it is unlikely that change will be rapid, or seen on a widespread scale.","PeriodicalId":80033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of management in medicine","volume":"15 3 1","pages":"188-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/02689230110403678","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical governance: a convincing strategy for quality improvement?\",\"authors\":\"M. Roland, S. Campbell, D. Wilkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/02689230110403678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clinical governance is a new policy introduced by the UK government to improve quality of care in the National Health Service; it imposes a \\\"duty of quality\\\" on all NHS organisations, and aims to bring together managerial, organisational and clinical approaches to improving quality of care. Infrastructures have been established to support quality improvement in NHS organisations and priorities for quality improvement have been established. Initial approaches are largely educational. However, information on quality of care is starting to be shared, and experiments are being conducted with a range of financial and contractual incentives for quality improvement. For widespread cultural change to occur, a \\\"no blame\\\" approach to quality improvement will be necessary; this may be incompatible with the need to identify and eliminate bad practice. Other tensions include the rapid pace of change being centrally driven and uneven development of the infrastructure to support clinical governance. What has not yet been shown is that quality of care has improved. It is too early to say this yet. Given the magnitude both of the vision and the work required, it is unlikely that change will be rapid, or seen on a widespread scale.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of management in medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 3 1\",\"pages\":\"188-201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/02689230110403678\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of management in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/02689230110403678\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of management in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/02689230110403678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

临床治理是英国政府为提高国民保健服务质量而推出的一项新政策;它对所有NHS组织施加了“质量责任”,旨在将管理、组织和临床方法结合起来,以提高护理质量。已经建立了基础设施,以支持国民保健制度组织的质量改进,并确定了质量改进的优先事项。最初的方法主要是教育性的。然而,关于护理质量的信息正在开始共享,并且正在进行一系列旨在提高质量的财政和合同激励措施的实验。为了实现广泛的文化变革,必须采取“不责备”的方法来提高质量;这可能与识别和消除不良实践的需要不相容。其他紧张局势包括中央驱动的快速变化和支持临床治理的基础设施发展不平衡。但尚未得到证实的是,医疗质量已经得到改善。现在说这个还为时过早。考虑到愿景和所需工作的规模,变化不太可能迅速发生,也不太可能大规模发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical governance: a convincing strategy for quality improvement?
Clinical governance is a new policy introduced by the UK government to improve quality of care in the National Health Service; it imposes a "duty of quality" on all NHS organisations, and aims to bring together managerial, organisational and clinical approaches to improving quality of care. Infrastructures have been established to support quality improvement in NHS organisations and priorities for quality improvement have been established. Initial approaches are largely educational. However, information on quality of care is starting to be shared, and experiments are being conducted with a range of financial and contractual incentives for quality improvement. For widespread cultural change to occur, a "no blame" approach to quality improvement will be necessary; this may be incompatible with the need to identify and eliminate bad practice. Other tensions include the rapid pace of change being centrally driven and uneven development of the infrastructure to support clinical governance. What has not yet been shown is that quality of care has improved. It is too early to say this yet. Given the magnitude both of the vision and the work required, it is unlikely that change will be rapid, or seen on a widespread scale.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信