{"title":"胜诉方的律师费[专利]","authors":"M. Klee","doi":"10.1109/MEMB.2009.934251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, the normal rule is that each party to a lawsuit pays its own attorneys' fees. However, some statutes, including the Copyright Act, give the trial judge the authority to make the loser pay some or all of the winner's attorneys' fees when the loser, in one way or another, has acted badly. The question then becomes what constitutes sufficiently bad behavior so as to justify an award of attorneys' fees. That was the question before the court in the recent case of Asset Marketing Systems (AMS) v. Gagnon.","PeriodicalId":50391,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/MEMB.2009.934251","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attorneys' fees for the winner [Patents]\",\"authors\":\"M. Klee\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MEMB.2009.934251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the United States, the normal rule is that each party to a lawsuit pays its own attorneys' fees. However, some statutes, including the Copyright Act, give the trial judge the authority to make the loser pay some or all of the winner's attorneys' fees when the loser, in one way or another, has acted badly. The question then becomes what constitutes sufficiently bad behavior so as to justify an award of attorneys' fees. That was the question before the court in the recent case of Asset Marketing Systems (AMS) v. Gagnon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/MEMB.2009.934251\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMB.2009.934251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMB.2009.934251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In the United States, the normal rule is that each party to a lawsuit pays its own attorneys' fees. However, some statutes, including the Copyright Act, give the trial judge the authority to make the loser pay some or all of the winner's attorneys' fees when the loser, in one way or another, has acted badly. The question then becomes what constitutes sufficiently bad behavior so as to justify an award of attorneys' fees. That was the question before the court in the recent case of Asset Marketing Systems (AMS) v. Gagnon.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
