M. Riechert, Sophie Biesenbender, W. Dees, Daniel Sirtes
{"title":"将研究信息元数据定义为一个邪恶的问题?通过论证可视化来描述和解决问题","authors":"M. Riechert, Sophie Biesenbender, W. Dees, Daniel Sirtes","doi":"10.1108/PROG-01-2015-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to focus on the development of definitional standards for research information as a wicked problem. A central solution strategy for such problems, increasing transparency by argumentation visualisation, is being evaluated. Design/methodology/approach – Qualitative formal content analysis is used in order to examine whether the process of definition standardisation in the project can be characterised as a wicked problem. Action Research is used to assess the effect of argumentation visualisation in the project. Findings – The results of the content analysis confirm the interpretation of the standardisation process as a wicked problem. The implementation of argumentation visualisation shows to increase the meetings’ focus and effectiveness. Research limitations/implications – The relationship between information exchange, transparency and acceptance of the development result should be addressed in future empirical analyses. Visualisation solutions require further devel...","PeriodicalId":49663,"journal":{"name":"Program-Electronic Library and Information Systems","volume":"50 1","pages":"303-324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/PROG-01-2015-0009","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing definitions of research information metadata as a wicked problem? Characterisation and solution by argumentation visualisation\",\"authors\":\"M. Riechert, Sophie Biesenbender, W. Dees, Daniel Sirtes\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/PROG-01-2015-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to focus on the development of definitional standards for research information as a wicked problem. A central solution strategy for such problems, increasing transparency by argumentation visualisation, is being evaluated. Design/methodology/approach – Qualitative formal content analysis is used in order to examine whether the process of definition standardisation in the project can be characterised as a wicked problem. Action Research is used to assess the effect of argumentation visualisation in the project. Findings – The results of the content analysis confirm the interpretation of the standardisation process as a wicked problem. The implementation of argumentation visualisation shows to increase the meetings’ focus and effectiveness. Research limitations/implications – The relationship between information exchange, transparency and acceptance of the development result should be addressed in future empirical analyses. Visualisation solutions require further devel...\",\"PeriodicalId\":49663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Program-Electronic Library and Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"303-324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/PROG-01-2015-0009\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Program-Electronic Library and Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-01-2015-0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Program-Electronic Library and Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-01-2015-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Developing definitions of research information metadata as a wicked problem? Characterisation and solution by argumentation visualisation
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to focus on the development of definitional standards for research information as a wicked problem. A central solution strategy for such problems, increasing transparency by argumentation visualisation, is being evaluated. Design/methodology/approach – Qualitative formal content analysis is used in order to examine whether the process of definition standardisation in the project can be characterised as a wicked problem. Action Research is used to assess the effect of argumentation visualisation in the project. Findings – The results of the content analysis confirm the interpretation of the standardisation process as a wicked problem. The implementation of argumentation visualisation shows to increase the meetings’ focus and effectiveness. Research limitations/implications – The relationship between information exchange, transparency and acceptance of the development result should be addressed in future empirical analyses. Visualisation solutions require further devel...
期刊介绍:
■Automation of library and information services ■Storage and retrieval of all forms of electronic information ■Delivery of information to end users ■Database design and management ■Techniques for storing and distributing information ■Networking and communications technology ■The Internet ■User interface design ■Procurement of systems ■User training and support ■System evaluation