将研究信息元数据定义为一个邪恶的问题?通过论证可视化来描述和解决问题

Q Social Sciences
M. Riechert, Sophie Biesenbender, W. Dees, Daniel Sirtes
{"title":"将研究信息元数据定义为一个邪恶的问题?通过论证可视化来描述和解决问题","authors":"M. Riechert, Sophie Biesenbender, W. Dees, Daniel Sirtes","doi":"10.1108/PROG-01-2015-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to focus on the development of definitional standards for research information as a wicked problem. A central solution strategy for such problems, increasing transparency by argumentation visualisation, is being evaluated. Design/methodology/approach – Qualitative formal content analysis is used in order to examine whether the process of definition standardisation in the project can be characterised as a wicked problem. Action Research is used to assess the effect of argumentation visualisation in the project. Findings – The results of the content analysis confirm the interpretation of the standardisation process as a wicked problem. The implementation of argumentation visualisation shows to increase the meetings’ focus and effectiveness. Research limitations/implications – The relationship between information exchange, transparency and acceptance of the development result should be addressed in future empirical analyses. Visualisation solutions require further devel...","PeriodicalId":49663,"journal":{"name":"Program-Electronic Library and Information Systems","volume":"50 1","pages":"303-324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/PROG-01-2015-0009","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing definitions of research information metadata as a wicked problem? Characterisation and solution by argumentation visualisation\",\"authors\":\"M. Riechert, Sophie Biesenbender, W. Dees, Daniel Sirtes\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/PROG-01-2015-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to focus on the development of definitional standards for research information as a wicked problem. A central solution strategy for such problems, increasing transparency by argumentation visualisation, is being evaluated. Design/methodology/approach – Qualitative formal content analysis is used in order to examine whether the process of definition standardisation in the project can be characterised as a wicked problem. Action Research is used to assess the effect of argumentation visualisation in the project. Findings – The results of the content analysis confirm the interpretation of the standardisation process as a wicked problem. The implementation of argumentation visualisation shows to increase the meetings’ focus and effectiveness. Research limitations/implications – The relationship between information exchange, transparency and acceptance of the development result should be addressed in future empirical analyses. Visualisation solutions require further devel...\",\"PeriodicalId\":49663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Program-Electronic Library and Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"303-324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/PROG-01-2015-0009\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Program-Electronic Library and Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-01-2015-0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Program-Electronic Library and Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-01-2015-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目的-本文的目的是把重点放在研究信息的定义标准的发展作为一个邪恶的问题。目前正在评价一项解决这些问题的中心战略,即通过论证可视化提高透明度。设计/方法论/方法——使用定性的正式内容分析来检查项目中定义标准化的过程是否可以被描述为一个邪恶的问题。行动研究用于评估论证可视化在项目中的效果。调查结果-内容分析的结果证实了对标准化过程的解释是一个邪恶的问题。论证可视化的实施增加了会议的重点和有效性。研究局限/影响-在未来的实证分析中,应处理信息交换、透明度和对发展结果的接受之间的关系。可视化解决方案需要进一步开发……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing definitions of research information metadata as a wicked problem? Characterisation and solution by argumentation visualisation
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to focus on the development of definitional standards for research information as a wicked problem. A central solution strategy for such problems, increasing transparency by argumentation visualisation, is being evaluated. Design/methodology/approach – Qualitative formal content analysis is used in order to examine whether the process of definition standardisation in the project can be characterised as a wicked problem. Action Research is used to assess the effect of argumentation visualisation in the project. Findings – The results of the content analysis confirm the interpretation of the standardisation process as a wicked problem. The implementation of argumentation visualisation shows to increase the meetings’ focus and effectiveness. Research limitations/implications – The relationship between information exchange, transparency and acceptance of the development result should be addressed in future empirical analyses. Visualisation solutions require further devel...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Program-Electronic Library and Information Systems
Program-Electronic Library and Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ■Automation of library and information services ■Storage and retrieval of all forms of electronic information ■Delivery of information to end users ■Database design and management ■Techniques for storing and distributing information ■Networking and communications technology ■The Internet ■User interface design ■Procurement of systems ■User training and support ■System evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信