参与与疏远:布里斯托尔绿色品牌的“双城记”

IF 3.7 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Laura Reynolds, H. Doering, Nicole Koenig‐Lewis, K. Peattie
{"title":"参与与疏远:布里斯托尔绿色品牌的“双城记”","authors":"Laura Reynolds, H. Doering, Nicole Koenig‐Lewis, K. Peattie","doi":"10.1108/ejm-08-2021-0602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nDrawing on the service-dominant logic and taking a multi-stakeholder brand value co-creation perspective, this paper aims to investigate whether positioning a place brand around sustainability helps or hinders stakeholders’ ability to co-create value for themselves and the brand.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper is based on a case study of Bristol’s city branding following its award of European Green Capital, drawing on 29 in-depth interviews with key informants from multiple stakeholder groups. These interviews are supported by secondary material and field observations.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings evidence a “tale of two cities”. When sustainability is used as a positioning device, tensions are identified across three elements of brand co-creation: brand meanings; extraordinary versus mundane brand performances; and empowerment and disempowerment in branding governance. These tensions create stakeholder experiences of both engagement and estrangement.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis paper is based on one case study and evaluates face-to-face stakeholder interactions. Future research could access further stakeholders, across multiple cities and also examine their digital engagement.\n\n\nPractical implications\nPositioning a brand as sustainable (i.e. green) requires strong commitment to other ethical principles in practice. Brand practitioners and marketers may benefit from advancing stakeholders’ everyday brand performances to reduce disillusionment.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nRallying around virtuous associations, i.e. sustainability, does not in itself facilitate the generation of value for stakeholders and the brand, but instead can illuminate power imbalances and tensions in stakeholder interactions that result in a co-destruction of value.\n","PeriodicalId":48401,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Marketing","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engagement and estrangement: a “tale of two cities” for Bristol’s green branding\",\"authors\":\"Laura Reynolds, H. Doering, Nicole Koenig‐Lewis, K. Peattie\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ejm-08-2021-0602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nDrawing on the service-dominant logic and taking a multi-stakeholder brand value co-creation perspective, this paper aims to investigate whether positioning a place brand around sustainability helps or hinders stakeholders’ ability to co-create value for themselves and the brand.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis paper is based on a case study of Bristol’s city branding following its award of European Green Capital, drawing on 29 in-depth interviews with key informants from multiple stakeholder groups. These interviews are supported by secondary material and field observations.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe findings evidence a “tale of two cities”. When sustainability is used as a positioning device, tensions are identified across three elements of brand co-creation: brand meanings; extraordinary versus mundane brand performances; and empowerment and disempowerment in branding governance. These tensions create stakeholder experiences of both engagement and estrangement.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis paper is based on one case study and evaluates face-to-face stakeholder interactions. Future research could access further stakeholders, across multiple cities and also examine their digital engagement.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nPositioning a brand as sustainable (i.e. green) requires strong commitment to other ethical principles in practice. Brand practitioners and marketers may benefit from advancing stakeholders’ everyday brand performances to reduce disillusionment.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nRallying around virtuous associations, i.e. sustainability, does not in itself facilitate the generation of value for stakeholders and the brand, but instead can illuminate power imbalances and tensions in stakeholder interactions that result in a co-destruction of value.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":48401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Marketing\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-08-2021-0602\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-08-2021-0602","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于服务主导逻辑,以多利益相关者品牌价值共同创造的视角,本文旨在探讨围绕可持续性定位地方品牌是否有助于或阻碍利益相关者为自己和品牌共同创造价值的能力。设计/方法/方法本文基于布里斯托尔获得欧洲绿色资本奖后的城市品牌案例研究,并对来自多个利益相关者团体的关键线人进行了29次深入访谈。这些访谈得到了二手材料和实地观察的支持。这些发现证明了“双城记”。当可持续性被用作定位工具时,品牌共同创造的三个要素之间存在紧张关系:品牌意义;非凡与平凡的品牌表现;以及在品牌管理中赋予权力和剥夺权力。这些紧张关系给利益相关者带来了参与和疏远的体验。本文基于一个案例研究,并评估了面对面的利益相关者互动。未来的研究可以访问更多的利益相关者,跨越多个城市,并检查他们的数字参与。实际意义将一个品牌定位为可持续(即绿色),需要在实践中对其他道德原则作出坚定的承诺。品牌从业者和营销人员可以从提高利益相关者的日常品牌表现中获益,以减少幻灭感。围绕良性联系(即可持续性)进行合作,本身并不能促进利益相关者和品牌的价值产生,而是可以阐明利益相关者互动中的权力失衡和紧张关系,从而导致价值的共同破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engagement and estrangement: a “tale of two cities” for Bristol’s green branding
Purpose Drawing on the service-dominant logic and taking a multi-stakeholder brand value co-creation perspective, this paper aims to investigate whether positioning a place brand around sustainability helps or hinders stakeholders’ ability to co-create value for themselves and the brand. Design/methodology/approach This paper is based on a case study of Bristol’s city branding following its award of European Green Capital, drawing on 29 in-depth interviews with key informants from multiple stakeholder groups. These interviews are supported by secondary material and field observations. Findings The findings evidence a “tale of two cities”. When sustainability is used as a positioning device, tensions are identified across three elements of brand co-creation: brand meanings; extraordinary versus mundane brand performances; and empowerment and disempowerment in branding governance. These tensions create stakeholder experiences of both engagement and estrangement. Research limitations/implications This paper is based on one case study and evaluates face-to-face stakeholder interactions. Future research could access further stakeholders, across multiple cities and also examine their digital engagement. Practical implications Positioning a brand as sustainable (i.e. green) requires strong commitment to other ethical principles in practice. Brand practitioners and marketers may benefit from advancing stakeholders’ everyday brand performances to reduce disillusionment. Originality/value Rallying around virtuous associations, i.e. sustainability, does not in itself facilitate the generation of value for stakeholders and the brand, but instead can illuminate power imbalances and tensions in stakeholder interactions that result in a co-destruction of value.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: The EJM is receptive to all areas of research which are relevant to marketing academic research, some examples are: ■Sustainability and ethical issues in marketing ■Consumer behaviour ■Advertising and branding issues ■Sales management and personal selling ■Methodology and metatheory of marketing research ■International and export marketing ■Services marketing ■New product development and innovation ■Retailing and distribution ■Macromarketing and societal issues ■Pricing and economic decision making in marketing ■Marketing models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信