这是一项探索性研究的第一阶段,该研究涉及英国火灾和救援服务,涉及纵火的儿童和年轻人

IF 0.5 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
J. Foster
{"title":"这是一项探索性研究的第一阶段,该研究涉及英国火灾和救援服务,涉及纵火的儿童和年轻人","authors":"J. Foster","doi":"10.1108/jcrpp-06-2021-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to outline the first stages of an exploratory study into how the UK fire and rescue services (FRSs) identify those children and young people who require psychosocial interventions to address their firesetting behaviour.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA purposive sample (N = 53) representing all the UK FRSs was recruited. Participants completed an online survey to establish the type of firesetting intervention provided, if any; the training and policies available to staff who identify those clients requiring psychosocial interventions and what influences this decision-making.\n\n\nFindings\nDecision-making on how to identify clients requiring psychosocial interventions was dominated by professional judgement informed by practitioner training and experience alone, which is subject to human error and bias. Some staff undertaking this risk-critical work have no access to training and/or written guidance to assist their decision-making. Nearly 30% of participants (N = 14) deemed national firesetting policy as not useful in identifying the type of firesetting intervention needed. The development of a risk assessment tool, training and national written guidance were considered the three main ways staff could be helped in identifying those clients requiring psychosocial interventions.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe implications are as follows: the development of a risk assessment tool for fire and rescue service staff working with children and young people who set fires, a requirement for all fire and rescue staff working with children and young people who set fires to receive mandatory training in this specialist field of work, all FRSs to offer firesetting intervention services to children and young people, all FRSs to have written firesetting policies that assist staff in their identification of firesetting risk and national firesetting guidance for FRSs that assists staff in their identification of firesetting risk and the tenets of defensible decision-making.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first study to look at how the UK FRSs identify those children and young people requiring psychosocial interventions to address their firesetting behaviour. The 100% completion rate to the online survey suggests the findings are generalisable across all the UK FRSs, providing the FRS professional body with an opportunity to instigate the changes their frontline practitioners and managers have identified.\n","PeriodicalId":43553,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The first stage of an exploratory study into the UK fire and rescue services working with children and young people who set fires\",\"authors\":\"J. Foster\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jcrpp-06-2021-0035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to outline the first stages of an exploratory study into how the UK fire and rescue services (FRSs) identify those children and young people who require psychosocial interventions to address their firesetting behaviour.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA purposive sample (N = 53) representing all the UK FRSs was recruited. Participants completed an online survey to establish the type of firesetting intervention provided, if any; the training and policies available to staff who identify those clients requiring psychosocial interventions and what influences this decision-making.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nDecision-making on how to identify clients requiring psychosocial interventions was dominated by professional judgement informed by practitioner training and experience alone, which is subject to human error and bias. Some staff undertaking this risk-critical work have no access to training and/or written guidance to assist their decision-making. Nearly 30% of participants (N = 14) deemed national firesetting policy as not useful in identifying the type of firesetting intervention needed. The development of a risk assessment tool, training and national written guidance were considered the three main ways staff could be helped in identifying those clients requiring psychosocial interventions.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe implications are as follows: the development of a risk assessment tool for fire and rescue service staff working with children and young people who set fires, a requirement for all fire and rescue staff working with children and young people who set fires to receive mandatory training in this specialist field of work, all FRSs to offer firesetting intervention services to children and young people, all FRSs to have written firesetting policies that assist staff in their identification of firesetting risk and national firesetting guidance for FRSs that assists staff in their identification of firesetting risk and the tenets of defensible decision-making.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first study to look at how the UK FRSs identify those children and young people requiring psychosocial interventions to address their firesetting behaviour. The 100% completion rate to the online survey suggests the findings are generalisable across all the UK FRSs, providing the FRS professional body with an opportunity to instigate the changes their frontline practitioners and managers have identified.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcrpp-06-2021-0035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcrpp-06-2021-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在概述一项探索性研究的第一阶段,该研究旨在探讨英国消防和救援服务(FRSs)如何识别那些需要社会心理干预来解决其纵火行为的儿童和青少年。设计/方法/方法招募了一个有目的的样本(N = 53),代表了英国所有的frs。参与者完成了一份在线调查,以确定所提供的纵火干预措施的类型(如果有的话);向确定需要心理社会干预的客户的工作人员提供的培训和政策,以及影响这一决策的因素。关于如何识别需要心理社会干预的客户的决策主要是由从业人员培训和经验所决定的专业判断,这容易受到人为错误和偏见的影响。一些从事这种风险重大工作的工作人员无法获得培训和/或书面指导以协助其决策。近30%的参与者(N = 14)认为国家放火政策在确定所需的放火干预类型方面没有用处。制定风险评估工具、培训和国家书面指导被认为是帮助工作人员确定需要社会心理干预的客户的三种主要方式。实际影响影响如下:为处理纵火的儿童及青少年的消防及救援服务人员制定风险评估工具;要求所有处理纵火的儿童及青少年的消防及救援服务人员接受这一专业领域的强制性培训;所有消防及救援服务人员向儿童及青少年提供纵火干预服务;所有财务报告编制书面的放火政策,以帮助工作人员识别放火风险,并为财务报告编制国家放火指南,以帮助工作人员识别放火风险和可辩护的决策原则。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一个研究英国frs如何识别那些需要心理社会干预来解决他们纵火行为的儿童和年轻人的研究。在线调查的100%完成率表明,调查结果适用于所有英国财务报告机构,为财务报告专业机构提供了一个机会,以推动其一线从业人员和管理人员所确定的变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The first stage of an exploratory study into the UK fire and rescue services working with children and young people who set fires
Purpose This paper aims to outline the first stages of an exploratory study into how the UK fire and rescue services (FRSs) identify those children and young people who require psychosocial interventions to address their firesetting behaviour. Design/methodology/approach A purposive sample (N = 53) representing all the UK FRSs was recruited. Participants completed an online survey to establish the type of firesetting intervention provided, if any; the training and policies available to staff who identify those clients requiring psychosocial interventions and what influences this decision-making. Findings Decision-making on how to identify clients requiring psychosocial interventions was dominated by professional judgement informed by practitioner training and experience alone, which is subject to human error and bias. Some staff undertaking this risk-critical work have no access to training and/or written guidance to assist their decision-making. Nearly 30% of participants (N = 14) deemed national firesetting policy as not useful in identifying the type of firesetting intervention needed. The development of a risk assessment tool, training and national written guidance were considered the three main ways staff could be helped in identifying those clients requiring psychosocial interventions. Practical implications The implications are as follows: the development of a risk assessment tool for fire and rescue service staff working with children and young people who set fires, a requirement for all fire and rescue staff working with children and young people who set fires to receive mandatory training in this specialist field of work, all FRSs to offer firesetting intervention services to children and young people, all FRSs to have written firesetting policies that assist staff in their identification of firesetting risk and national firesetting guidance for FRSs that assists staff in their identification of firesetting risk and the tenets of defensible decision-making. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first study to look at how the UK FRSs identify those children and young people requiring psychosocial interventions to address their firesetting behaviour. The 100% completion rate to the online survey suggests the findings are generalisable across all the UK FRSs, providing the FRS professional body with an opportunity to instigate the changes their frontline practitioners and managers have identified.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信