阿司匹林预防腰椎管狭窄手术后深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的效果:一项双盲平行随机临床试验

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Farshad Nikouei, M. Chehrassan, M. Shakeri, Seyed Mani Mahdavi, E. Ameri, Arvin Eslami, A. Habibollahzadeh, Hasan Ghandhari
{"title":"阿司匹林预防腰椎管狭窄手术后深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的效果:一项双盲平行随机临床试验","authors":"Farshad Nikouei, M. Chehrassan, M. Shakeri, Seyed Mani Mahdavi, E. Ameri, Arvin Eslami, A. Habibollahzadeh, Hasan Ghandhari","doi":"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a great postoperative challenge in all orthopaedic surgeries. To the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate the efficacy of aspirin administration in the prevention of DVT in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. Methods: In this double-blind parallel randomized clinical trial, a total of 126 candidates (age 40 yr and older) were admitted between June 2021 to December 2021. Patients were randomly assigned to the intervention chemoprophylaxis group (41 patients receiving 325 mg aspirin) and controls. The DVT occurrence was recorded by clinical features (Well’s criteria), Doppler lower limbs ultrasound, and D-dimer levels in all participants at baseline (24 hr before the time of surgery) and 2, 6, and 12 wk after surgery in postoperative visits. Results: The mean age of the participants was 63.72±6.87 yr. Baseline demographic values were similar in both groups (P>0.05). The mean follow-up duration was 6.11±2.33 mo. No cases of DVT or abnormal findings on Doppler ultrasound were observed in either group. The mean duration of hospitalization or intensive care unit (ICU) admission was similar between the two groups. Mean baseline D-dimer levels were significantly higher in the intervention group compared with the controls (P=0.047), while it was similar in both groups 3 mo after the operation (P=0.13). Conclusions: In the current study, no case of DVT was observed in either study group. These data do not support the use of aspirin as an anticoagulant for DVT prophylaxis following regular lumbar spinal surgeries. Level of Evidence: Level II.","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"10 3 1","pages":"543 - 547"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of aspirin in preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after lumbar canal spinal stenosis surgeries: a double-blind parallel randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Farshad Nikouei, M. Chehrassan, M. Shakeri, Seyed Mani Mahdavi, E. Ameri, Arvin Eslami, A. Habibollahzadeh, Hasan Ghandhari\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a great postoperative challenge in all orthopaedic surgeries. To the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate the efficacy of aspirin administration in the prevention of DVT in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. Methods: In this double-blind parallel randomized clinical trial, a total of 126 candidates (age 40 yr and older) were admitted between June 2021 to December 2021. Patients were randomly assigned to the intervention chemoprophylaxis group (41 patients receiving 325 mg aspirin) and controls. The DVT occurrence was recorded by clinical features (Well’s criteria), Doppler lower limbs ultrasound, and D-dimer levels in all participants at baseline (24 hr before the time of surgery) and 2, 6, and 12 wk after surgery in postoperative visits. Results: The mean age of the participants was 63.72±6.87 yr. Baseline demographic values were similar in both groups (P>0.05). The mean follow-up duration was 6.11±2.33 mo. No cases of DVT or abnormal findings on Doppler ultrasound were observed in either group. The mean duration of hospitalization or intensive care unit (ICU) admission was similar between the two groups. Mean baseline D-dimer levels were significantly higher in the intervention group compared with the controls (P=0.047), while it was similar in both groups 3 mo after the operation (P=0.13). Conclusions: In the current study, no case of DVT was observed in either study group. These data do not support the use of aspirin as an anticoagulant for DVT prophylaxis following regular lumbar spinal surgeries. Level of Evidence: Level II.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Orthopaedic Practice\",\"volume\":\"10 3 1\",\"pages\":\"543 - 547\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Orthopaedic Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:深静脉血栓形成(DVT)是骨科手术后的一大难题。据作者所知,这项研究是第一个评估阿司匹林预防腰椎手术患者DVT疗效的研究。方法:在这项双盲平行随机临床试验中,共有126名候选人(40岁及以上)于2021年6月至2021年12月入院。患者被随机分配到干预化学预防组(41例患者接受325 mg阿司匹林)和对照组。通过临床特征(Well’s标准)、多普勒下肢超声和d -二聚体水平记录所有参与者在基线(手术前24小时)和术后2、6、12周的DVT发生情况。结果:参与者的平均年龄为63.72±6.87岁,两组的基线人口学值相似(P < 0.05)。平均随访时间为6.11±2.33个月。两组均未见深静脉血栓及多普勒超声异常。两组的平均住院时间或重症监护病房(ICU)入院时间相似。干预组平均基线d -二聚体水平显著高于对照组(P=0.047),两组术后3个月差异无统计学意义(P=0.13)。结论:在目前的研究中,两组均未观察到DVT病例。这些数据不支持在常规腰椎手术后使用阿司匹林作为预防深静脉血栓形成的抗凝剂。证据等级:二级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of aspirin in preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after lumbar canal spinal stenosis surgeries: a double-blind parallel randomized clinical trial
Background: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a great postoperative challenge in all orthopaedic surgeries. To the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate the efficacy of aspirin administration in the prevention of DVT in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. Methods: In this double-blind parallel randomized clinical trial, a total of 126 candidates (age 40 yr and older) were admitted between June 2021 to December 2021. Patients were randomly assigned to the intervention chemoprophylaxis group (41 patients receiving 325 mg aspirin) and controls. The DVT occurrence was recorded by clinical features (Well’s criteria), Doppler lower limbs ultrasound, and D-dimer levels in all participants at baseline (24 hr before the time of surgery) and 2, 6, and 12 wk after surgery in postoperative visits. Results: The mean age of the participants was 63.72±6.87 yr. Baseline demographic values were similar in both groups (P>0.05). The mean follow-up duration was 6.11±2.33 mo. No cases of DVT or abnormal findings on Doppler ultrasound were observed in either group. The mean duration of hospitalization or intensive care unit (ICU) admission was similar between the two groups. Mean baseline D-dimer levels were significantly higher in the intervention group compared with the controls (P=0.047), while it was similar in both groups 3 mo after the operation (P=0.13). Conclusions: In the current study, no case of DVT was observed in either study group. These data do not support the use of aspirin as an anticoagulant for DVT prophylaxis following regular lumbar spinal surgeries. Level of Evidence: Level II.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信