{"title":"自体骨用于颅骨缺损的重建","authors":"Qiujian Zhang, Xuping Tian, Hansheng Shu, Hui Zhang, Shanjing Xuan, Qing Chao","doi":"10.1097/WNQ.0000000000000195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:To restore the normal barriers protecting the intracranial structures and obtain a permanent or very durable reconstruction. Methods:This retrospective study spanning 3 years included 36 patients who underwent reconstruction of skull defects either with autologous bone or with 3-dimensional (3D) titanium mesh. To analyze difference of both, 2 groups (group A 1 group skull defect for reconstruction with 3D titanium mesh, group B the other group with autologous bone) were divided. Results:A favorable surgery outcome was attained in the follow-up without complications in the group B. Osteolysis was not observed from 3D reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) from 3D reconstruction of CT in the group B (P>0.05). Complications was significantly different, comparing with group A (P<0.05). General features (age, follow-up) were not different (P>0.05). Conclusion:Autologous bone for the reconstruction of skull defects seems to be good technique for permanent or very durable reconstruction.","PeriodicalId":56275,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery Quarterly","volume":"26 1","pages":"5–7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/WNQ.0000000000000195","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autologous Bone for the Reconstruction of Skull Defects\",\"authors\":\"Qiujian Zhang, Xuping Tian, Hansheng Shu, Hui Zhang, Shanjing Xuan, Qing Chao\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNQ.0000000000000195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective:To restore the normal barriers protecting the intracranial structures and obtain a permanent or very durable reconstruction. Methods:This retrospective study spanning 3 years included 36 patients who underwent reconstruction of skull defects either with autologous bone or with 3-dimensional (3D) titanium mesh. To analyze difference of both, 2 groups (group A 1 group skull defect for reconstruction with 3D titanium mesh, group B the other group with autologous bone) were divided. Results:A favorable surgery outcome was attained in the follow-up without complications in the group B. Osteolysis was not observed from 3D reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) from 3D reconstruction of CT in the group B (P>0.05). Complications was significantly different, comparing with group A (P<0.05). General features (age, follow-up) were not different (P>0.05). Conclusion:Autologous bone for the reconstruction of skull defects seems to be good technique for permanent or very durable reconstruction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgery Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"5–7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/WNQ.0000000000000195\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgery Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNQ.0000000000000195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNQ.0000000000000195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Autologous Bone for the Reconstruction of Skull Defects
Objective:To restore the normal barriers protecting the intracranial structures and obtain a permanent or very durable reconstruction. Methods:This retrospective study spanning 3 years included 36 patients who underwent reconstruction of skull defects either with autologous bone or with 3-dimensional (3D) titanium mesh. To analyze difference of both, 2 groups (group A 1 group skull defect for reconstruction with 3D titanium mesh, group B the other group with autologous bone) were divided. Results:A favorable surgery outcome was attained in the follow-up without complications in the group B. Osteolysis was not observed from 3D reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) from 3D reconstruction of CT in the group B (P>0.05). Complications was significantly different, comparing with group A (P<0.05). General features (age, follow-up) were not different (P>0.05). Conclusion:Autologous bone for the reconstruction of skull defects seems to be good technique for permanent or very durable reconstruction.
期刊介绍:
Neurosurgery Quarterly synthesizes the broad wealth of material on international developments in the diagnosis, management, and surgical treatment of neurological disorders. By encompassing viewpoints from worldwide sources, the journal provides information in greater depth than is usually found in the medical literature.