颅内动静脉畸形(AVMs)在三级中心的处理

Q Medicine
R. Shrestha, Yi Liu, C. You
{"title":"颅内动静脉畸形(AVMs)在三级中心的处理","authors":"R. Shrestha, Yi Liu, C. You","doi":"10.1097/WNQ.0000000000000100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:Treatment of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remains a challenge in the neurosurgical entity. Our study aimed to review the procedures outcomes and complications of different strategies. Clinical Materials and Methods:We retrospectively reviewed 304 patients with AVMs treated with various combinations of radiosurgery (RS), surgery, and endovascular techniques between December 2010 and July 2012. Their presentation, preoperative neurological status, and postoperative outcome were analyzed. Results:During the study period, there were 65.1% male and 34.9% female patients. Mean age was 33.31 years, ranging from 0 months to 78 years. According to the Spetzler-Martin (SM) grading system, 2 patients had grade I lesions, 69 patients had grade II, 159 patients had grade III, 65 had grade IV lesions, and 9 had grade V lesions. Of the total 304 patients, 106 underwent surgery, 60 underwent RS, 47 underwent embolization, and underwent conservative 34 and 57 multimodal therapies. Of all the patients presenting with AVM, 187 (61.52%) demonstrated excellent outcome and 70 (23%) showed no significant disability despite symptoms according to the Modified Rankin scale score. Twelve patients experienced rebleeding after procedure, 6 in endovascular group, 4 in RS, and 2 in surgery group. Statistically, we compared each procedure in between with Modified Rankin scale in first 3 SM grade and last 2, which indicated significance (P<0.05). Conclusions:Successful treatment of brain AVMs requires extensive preoperative planning. Surgery intervention or combined procedure has good outcome for SM grade I to III AVMs. Multimodality therapy has favorable outcome with minimum morbidity and mortality for SM grade IV to V AVMs.","PeriodicalId":56275,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery Quarterly","volume":"25 1","pages":"529–535"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/WNQ.0000000000000100","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations (AVMs) at a Tertiary Center\",\"authors\":\"R. Shrestha, Yi Liu, C. You\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNQ.0000000000000100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective:Treatment of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remains a challenge in the neurosurgical entity. Our study aimed to review the procedures outcomes and complications of different strategies. Clinical Materials and Methods:We retrospectively reviewed 304 patients with AVMs treated with various combinations of radiosurgery (RS), surgery, and endovascular techniques between December 2010 and July 2012. Their presentation, preoperative neurological status, and postoperative outcome were analyzed. Results:During the study period, there were 65.1% male and 34.9% female patients. Mean age was 33.31 years, ranging from 0 months to 78 years. According to the Spetzler-Martin (SM) grading system, 2 patients had grade I lesions, 69 patients had grade II, 159 patients had grade III, 65 had grade IV lesions, and 9 had grade V lesions. Of the total 304 patients, 106 underwent surgery, 60 underwent RS, 47 underwent embolization, and underwent conservative 34 and 57 multimodal therapies. Of all the patients presenting with AVM, 187 (61.52%) demonstrated excellent outcome and 70 (23%) showed no significant disability despite symptoms according to the Modified Rankin scale score. Twelve patients experienced rebleeding after procedure, 6 in endovascular group, 4 in RS, and 2 in surgery group. Statistically, we compared each procedure in between with Modified Rankin scale in first 3 SM grade and last 2, which indicated significance (P<0.05). Conclusions:Successful treatment of brain AVMs requires extensive preoperative planning. Surgery intervention or combined procedure has good outcome for SM grade I to III AVMs. Multimodality therapy has favorable outcome with minimum morbidity and mortality for SM grade IV to V AVMs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgery Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"529–535\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/WNQ.0000000000000100\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgery Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNQ.0000000000000100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNQ.0000000000000100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:动静脉畸形(AVMs)的治疗仍然是神经外科的一个挑战。我们的研究旨在回顾不同策略的手术、结果和并发症。临床资料和方法:我们回顾性分析了2010年12月至2012年7月间304例采用放外科、手术和血管内技术联合治疗的动静脉畸形患者。分析他们的表现、术前神经状态和术后结果。结果:研究期间,男性占65.1%,女性占34.9%。平均年龄33.31岁,0个月~ 78岁。根据Spetzler-Martin (SM)分级系统,2例患者为I级病变,69例为II级病变,159例为III级病变,65例为IV级病变,9例为V级病变。在304例患者中,106例接受了手术,60例接受了RS, 47例接受了栓塞,34例接受了保守治疗,57例接受了多模式治疗。根据改良Rankin量表评分,在所有AVM患者中,187例(61.52%)表现出良好的预后,70例(23%)尽管有症状但无明显残疾。术后再出血12例,血管内组6例,RS组4例,手术组2例。在统计学上,我们用改良Rankin量表对SM前3个等级和后2个等级的各程序进行比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:成功治疗脑动静脉畸形需要广泛的术前计划。手术干预或联合手术治疗SM级1 ~ 3级动静脉畸形疗效良好。多模式治疗对SM级IV至V级AVMs有良好的疗效,发病率和死亡率最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations (AVMs) at a Tertiary Center
Objective:Treatment of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remains a challenge in the neurosurgical entity. Our study aimed to review the procedures outcomes and complications of different strategies. Clinical Materials and Methods:We retrospectively reviewed 304 patients with AVMs treated with various combinations of radiosurgery (RS), surgery, and endovascular techniques between December 2010 and July 2012. Their presentation, preoperative neurological status, and postoperative outcome were analyzed. Results:During the study period, there were 65.1% male and 34.9% female patients. Mean age was 33.31 years, ranging from 0 months to 78 years. According to the Spetzler-Martin (SM) grading system, 2 patients had grade I lesions, 69 patients had grade II, 159 patients had grade III, 65 had grade IV lesions, and 9 had grade V lesions. Of the total 304 patients, 106 underwent surgery, 60 underwent RS, 47 underwent embolization, and underwent conservative 34 and 57 multimodal therapies. Of all the patients presenting with AVM, 187 (61.52%) demonstrated excellent outcome and 70 (23%) showed no significant disability despite symptoms according to the Modified Rankin scale score. Twelve patients experienced rebleeding after procedure, 6 in endovascular group, 4 in RS, and 2 in surgery group. Statistically, we compared each procedure in between with Modified Rankin scale in first 3 SM grade and last 2, which indicated significance (P<0.05). Conclusions:Successful treatment of brain AVMs requires extensive preoperative planning. Surgery intervention or combined procedure has good outcome for SM grade I to III AVMs. Multimodality therapy has favorable outcome with minimum morbidity and mortality for SM grade IV to V AVMs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgery Quarterly
Neurosurgery Quarterly 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
0.08
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery Quarterly synthesizes the broad wealth of material on international developments in the diagnosis, management, and surgical treatment of neurological disorders. By encompassing viewpoints from worldwide sources, the journal provides information in greater depth than is usually found in the medical literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信