门诊药房服务与肿瘤学家合作对门诊化疗处方订单的影响

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
K. Demachi, Shinya Suzuki, Hayato Kamata, Hidetaka Suzuki, Yuka Sugama, K. Ikegawa, T. Igarashi, T. Kawasaki, Philip E. Johnson, M. Yamaguchi
{"title":"门诊药房服务与肿瘤学家合作对门诊化疗处方订单的影响","authors":"K. Demachi, Shinya Suzuki, Hayato Kamata, Hidetaka Suzuki, Yuka Sugama, K. Ikegawa, T. Igarashi, T. Kawasaki, Philip E. Johnson, M. Yamaguchi","doi":"10.1097/OP9.0000000000000010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact of a service in which clinical pharmacists collaborated with oncologists at an outpatient clinic on chemotherapy order prescriptions and adverse drug reaction management in outpatient cancer chemotherapy. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Subjects were patients who received pharmacist services at an outpatient clinic in 6 treatment divisions at the National Cancer Center Hospital East from June to September 2016. Pharmacist interventions were categorized and assessed for impact by 2 pharmacists according to previously published methods. Results: The 6 pharmacists worked a total of 1396 hours, providing 1645 pharmacy interventions to 3419 patients. Of the 1645 interventions, 459 interventions (27.9%) involved chemotherapy order prescriptions. The 459 interventions for chemotherapy prescriptions were categorized according to the previously reported categories “drug therapy safety” (n = 330, 71.9%), “other” (n = 91, 19.8%), “drug therapy efficacy” (n = 28, 6.1%), and “drug therapy indication” (n = 10, 2.2%). Of the 91 interventions categorized as “other,” the 2 most frequent types of interventions were “confirmation from pharmacists to oncologists about laboratory test order” (n = 54, 11.7%) and “consultation from oncologists to pharmacists about chemotherapy regimen” (n = 23, 5.0%). Most interventions were identified as having “no error” (n = 369, 80.4%), while 8 interventions (1.8%) were identified as being “potentially lethal” or “serious.” Moreover, 92.8% of interventions were identified as being “extremely significant,” “very significant” or “significant.” Conclusions: This study clarified the benefits of outpatient pharmacy services in which pharmacists collaborate with oncologists at an outpatient clinic on outpatient chemotherapy prescription orders.","PeriodicalId":39134,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oncology Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/OP9.0000000000000010","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of outpatient pharmacy services collaborating with oncologists at an outpatient clinic for outpatient chemotherapy prescription orders\",\"authors\":\"K. Demachi, Shinya Suzuki, Hayato Kamata, Hidetaka Suzuki, Yuka Sugama, K. Ikegawa, T. Igarashi, T. Kawasaki, Philip E. Johnson, M. Yamaguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OP9.0000000000000010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact of a service in which clinical pharmacists collaborated with oncologists at an outpatient clinic on chemotherapy order prescriptions and adverse drug reaction management in outpatient cancer chemotherapy. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Subjects were patients who received pharmacist services at an outpatient clinic in 6 treatment divisions at the National Cancer Center Hospital East from June to September 2016. Pharmacist interventions were categorized and assessed for impact by 2 pharmacists according to previously published methods. Results: The 6 pharmacists worked a total of 1396 hours, providing 1645 pharmacy interventions to 3419 patients. Of the 1645 interventions, 459 interventions (27.9%) involved chemotherapy order prescriptions. The 459 interventions for chemotherapy prescriptions were categorized according to the previously reported categories “drug therapy safety” (n = 330, 71.9%), “other” (n = 91, 19.8%), “drug therapy efficacy” (n = 28, 6.1%), and “drug therapy indication” (n = 10, 2.2%). Of the 91 interventions categorized as “other,” the 2 most frequent types of interventions were “confirmation from pharmacists to oncologists about laboratory test order” (n = 54, 11.7%) and “consultation from oncologists to pharmacists about chemotherapy regimen” (n = 23, 5.0%). Most interventions were identified as having “no error” (n = 369, 80.4%), while 8 interventions (1.8%) were identified as being “potentially lethal” or “serious.” Moreover, 92.8% of interventions were identified as being “extremely significant,” “very significant” or “significant.” Conclusions: This study clarified the benefits of outpatient pharmacy services in which pharmacists collaborate with oncologists at an outpatient clinic on outpatient chemotherapy prescription orders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Oncology Pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/OP9.0000000000000010\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Oncology Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OP9.0000000000000010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oncology Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OP9.0000000000000010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:本回顾性研究旨在评估临床药师与门诊肿瘤科医师合作对门诊肿瘤化疗处方和药物不良反应管理的影响。方法:这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究。研究对象为2016年6 - 9月在国家癌症中心东医院6个科室门诊接受药师服务的患者。2名药剂师根据先前发表的方法对药剂师干预措施进行分类和评估。结果:6名药师共工作1396小时,对3419例患者进行了1645次药学干预。在1645项干预措施中,459项(27.9%)涉及化疗处方。将459个化疗处方干预措施按既往报道的“药物治疗安全性”(n = 330,占71.9%)、“其他”(n = 91,占19.8%)、“药物治疗疗效”(n = 28,占6.1%)、“药物治疗指征”(n = 10,占2.2%)进行分类。在91项被分类为“其他”的干预措施中,2种最常见的干预措施是“药剂师向肿瘤科医生确认化验命令”(n = 54, 11.7%)和“肿瘤科医生向药剂师咨询化疗方案”(n = 23, 5.0%)。大多数干预措施被确定为“无错误”(n = 369, 80.4%),而8项干预措施(1.8%)被确定为“潜在致命”或“严重”。此外,92.8%的干预措施被确定为“非常重要”、“非常重要”或“重要”。结论:本研究阐明了门诊药房服务的好处,药剂师在门诊与肿瘤学家合作门诊化疗处方订单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of outpatient pharmacy services collaborating with oncologists at an outpatient clinic for outpatient chemotherapy prescription orders
Objectives: This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact of a service in which clinical pharmacists collaborated with oncologists at an outpatient clinic on chemotherapy order prescriptions and adverse drug reaction management in outpatient cancer chemotherapy. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Subjects were patients who received pharmacist services at an outpatient clinic in 6 treatment divisions at the National Cancer Center Hospital East from June to September 2016. Pharmacist interventions were categorized and assessed for impact by 2 pharmacists according to previously published methods. Results: The 6 pharmacists worked a total of 1396 hours, providing 1645 pharmacy interventions to 3419 patients. Of the 1645 interventions, 459 interventions (27.9%) involved chemotherapy order prescriptions. The 459 interventions for chemotherapy prescriptions were categorized according to the previously reported categories “drug therapy safety” (n = 330, 71.9%), “other” (n = 91, 19.8%), “drug therapy efficacy” (n = 28, 6.1%), and “drug therapy indication” (n = 10, 2.2%). Of the 91 interventions categorized as “other,” the 2 most frequent types of interventions were “confirmation from pharmacists to oncologists about laboratory test order” (n = 54, 11.7%) and “consultation from oncologists to pharmacists about chemotherapy regimen” (n = 23, 5.0%). Most interventions were identified as having “no error” (n = 369, 80.4%), while 8 interventions (1.8%) were identified as being “potentially lethal” or “serious.” Moreover, 92.8% of interventions were identified as being “extremely significant,” “very significant” or “significant.” Conclusions: This study clarified the benefits of outpatient pharmacy services in which pharmacists collaborate with oncologists at an outpatient clinic on outpatient chemotherapy prescription orders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信