{"title":"结构对含意计算的影响","authors":"Jon Ander Mendia","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffac004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an investigation of Ignorance Inferences by looking at the superlative modifier at least . The formal properties of these inferences are characterized in terms of the epistemic conditions that they impose on the speaker, thereby establishing how much can and must be inferred about what the speaker is ignorant about. The paper makes two main contributions. First, it argues that the form of these inferences depends solely on the structural properties of the expression that at least is modifying, which do not necessarily coincide with semantic entailment. Rather, rank and order seems to matter: with totally ordered associates, at least triggers Ignorance Inferences that may be formally different than those obtained with partially ordered associates (Mendia 2016b). Second, it builds on neo-Gricean double alternative generation mech-anisms (like Schwarz 2016) arguing that one of them must be provided by focus. on the Ignorance Inferences that arise with the modifier at least across these different types of associated scales. The first part of the is devoted to scrutinizing the exact form of Ignorance Inferences with at least with different types of scales and what they tell us about epistemic state in each case. Three key empirical points emerge from this investigation:","PeriodicalId":46947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Semantics","volume":"39 1","pages":"409-442"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural Effects on Implicature Calculation\",\"authors\":\"Jon Ander Mendia\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jos/ffac004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides an investigation of Ignorance Inferences by looking at the superlative modifier at least . The formal properties of these inferences are characterized in terms of the epistemic conditions that they impose on the speaker, thereby establishing how much can and must be inferred about what the speaker is ignorant about. The paper makes two main contributions. First, it argues that the form of these inferences depends solely on the structural properties of the expression that at least is modifying, which do not necessarily coincide with semantic entailment. Rather, rank and order seems to matter: with totally ordered associates, at least triggers Ignorance Inferences that may be formally different than those obtained with partially ordered associates (Mendia 2016b). Second, it builds on neo-Gricean double alternative generation mech-anisms (like Schwarz 2016) arguing that one of them must be provided by focus. on the Ignorance Inferences that arise with the modifier at least across these different types of associated scales. The first part of the is devoted to scrutinizing the exact form of Ignorance Inferences with at least with different types of scales and what they tell us about epistemic state in each case. Three key empirical points emerge from this investigation:\",\"PeriodicalId\":46947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Semantics\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"409-442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Semantics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffac004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffac004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper provides an investigation of Ignorance Inferences by looking at the superlative modifier at least . The formal properties of these inferences are characterized in terms of the epistemic conditions that they impose on the speaker, thereby establishing how much can and must be inferred about what the speaker is ignorant about. The paper makes two main contributions. First, it argues that the form of these inferences depends solely on the structural properties of the expression that at least is modifying, which do not necessarily coincide with semantic entailment. Rather, rank and order seems to matter: with totally ordered associates, at least triggers Ignorance Inferences that may be formally different than those obtained with partially ordered associates (Mendia 2016b). Second, it builds on neo-Gricean double alternative generation mech-anisms (like Schwarz 2016) arguing that one of them must be provided by focus. on the Ignorance Inferences that arise with the modifier at least across these different types of associated scales. The first part of the is devoted to scrutinizing the exact form of Ignorance Inferences with at least with different types of scales and what they tell us about epistemic state in each case. Three key empirical points emerge from this investigation:
期刊介绍:
Journal of Semantics aims to be the premier journal in semantics. It covers all areas in the study of meaning, with a focus on formal and experimental methods. The Journal welcomes submissions on semantics, pragmatics, the syntax/semantics interface, cross-linguistic semantics, experimental studies of meaning (processing, acquisition, neurolinguistics), and semantically informed philosophy of language.