结构对含意计算的影响

IF 2 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Jon Ander Mendia
{"title":"结构对含意计算的影响","authors":"Jon Ander Mendia","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffac004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an investigation of Ignorance Inferences by looking at the superlative modifier at least . The formal properties of these inferences are characterized in terms of the epistemic conditions that they impose on the speaker, thereby establishing how much can and must be inferred about what the speaker is ignorant about. The paper makes two main contributions. First, it argues that the form of these inferences depends solely on the structural properties of the expression that at least is modifying, which do not necessarily coincide with semantic entailment. Rather, rank and order seems to matter: with totally ordered associates, at least triggers Ignorance Inferences that may be formally different than those obtained with partially ordered associates (Mendia 2016b). Second, it builds on neo-Gricean double alternative generation mech-anisms (like Schwarz 2016) arguing that one of them must be provided by focus. on the Ignorance Inferences that arise with the modifier at least across these different types of associated scales. The first part of the is devoted to scrutinizing the exact form of Ignorance Inferences with at least with different types of scales and what they tell us about epistemic state in each case. Three key empirical points emerge from this investigation:","PeriodicalId":46947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Semantics","volume":"39 1","pages":"409-442"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural Effects on Implicature Calculation\",\"authors\":\"Jon Ander Mendia\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jos/ffac004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides an investigation of Ignorance Inferences by looking at the superlative modifier at least . The formal properties of these inferences are characterized in terms of the epistemic conditions that they impose on the speaker, thereby establishing how much can and must be inferred about what the speaker is ignorant about. The paper makes two main contributions. First, it argues that the form of these inferences depends solely on the structural properties of the expression that at least is modifying, which do not necessarily coincide with semantic entailment. Rather, rank and order seems to matter: with totally ordered associates, at least triggers Ignorance Inferences that may be formally different than those obtained with partially ordered associates (Mendia 2016b). Second, it builds on neo-Gricean double alternative generation mech-anisms (like Schwarz 2016) arguing that one of them must be provided by focus. on the Ignorance Inferences that arise with the modifier at least across these different types of associated scales. The first part of the is devoted to scrutinizing the exact form of Ignorance Inferences with at least with different types of scales and what they tell us about epistemic state in each case. Three key empirical points emerge from this investigation:\",\"PeriodicalId\":46947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Semantics\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"409-442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Semantics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffac004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffac004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文至少从最高级修饰语的角度对无知推理进行了研究。这些推论的形式属性是根据它们强加给说话人的认知条件来表征的,从而确定了说话人可以和必须推断出多少他不知道的东西。这篇论文有两个主要贡献。首先,它认为这些推理的形式仅仅取决于至少被修饰的表达的结构属性,这并不一定与语义蕴涵一致。相反,等级和顺序似乎很重要:对于完全有序的关联,至少会触发无知推断,这些推断可能与部分有序的关联在形式上不同(Mendia 2016b)。其次,它建立在新格里斯双替代生成机制的基础上(如Schwarz 2016),认为其中一个必须由焦点提供。至少在这些不同类型的相关量表中,由修饰语产生的无知推断。论文的第一部分是仔细研究无知推理的确切形式至少用不同类型的尺度以及它们在每种情况下告诉我们的认知状态。从这项调查中得出了三个关键的实证观点:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Structural Effects on Implicature Calculation
This paper provides an investigation of Ignorance Inferences by looking at the superlative modifier at least . The formal properties of these inferences are characterized in terms of the epistemic conditions that they impose on the speaker, thereby establishing how much can and must be inferred about what the speaker is ignorant about. The paper makes two main contributions. First, it argues that the form of these inferences depends solely on the structural properties of the expression that at least is modifying, which do not necessarily coincide with semantic entailment. Rather, rank and order seems to matter: with totally ordered associates, at least triggers Ignorance Inferences that may be formally different than those obtained with partially ordered associates (Mendia 2016b). Second, it builds on neo-Gricean double alternative generation mech-anisms (like Schwarz 2016) arguing that one of them must be provided by focus. on the Ignorance Inferences that arise with the modifier at least across these different types of associated scales. The first part of the is devoted to scrutinizing the exact form of Ignorance Inferences with at least with different types of scales and what they tell us about epistemic state in each case. Three key empirical points emerge from this investigation:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Journal of Semantics aims to be the premier journal in semantics. It covers all areas in the study of meaning, with a focus on formal and experimental methods. The Journal welcomes submissions on semantics, pragmatics, the syntax/semantics interface, cross-linguistic semantics, experimental studies of meaning (processing, acquisition, neurolinguistics), and semantically informed philosophy of language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信