Alexis M. Medema MScR , Stacy M. Goins BA , Charles M. Maxfield MD , Lars J. Grimm MD, MHS , Robert J. French MD , Jonathan G. Martin MD
{"title":"医学生在担任核心职员之前对放射学子专业的看法。","authors":"Alexis M. Medema MScR , Stacy M. Goins BA , Charles M. Maxfield MD , Lars J. Grimm MD, MHS , Robert J. French MD , Jonathan G. Martin MD","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2023.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and objectives</h3><p>Radiology remains underrepresented in U.S. medical school clinical curricula, and preconceived opinions about the field may impact whether students pursue elective exposure. A core radiology clerkship at one academic institution presents an opportunity to evaluate students’ early preferences for different radiology subspecialties, thus informing curricular design and inspiring student recruitment.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>At a single allopathic medical school, a required, four-week, clinical-year radiology clerkship that occurs in the second year includes immersive one-week experiences in two subspecialties. Prior to their clerkship, students rank their immersion preferences by distributing 100 points across eight fields, the values of which were analyzed as a proxy for interest. A secondary survey was distributed to active first- and second-year medical students to further investigate the factors drawing them to radiology.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Immersive experiences in musculoskeletal, body, and breast imaging were most preferred, earning ≥20 points from 41.6 %, 34.3 %, and 31.9 % of students, respectively. Women were significantly more likely than men to express interest in breast imaging (35.8 % vs. 24.8 %, </span><em>p</em><span> = 0.037) and pediatric radiology (28.8 % vs. 12.8 %, </span><em>p</em> = 0.001). Men were significantly more likely than women to prefer body imaging (41.9 % vs. 30.2 %, <em>p</em><span> = 0.034), neuroradiology (29.1 % vs. 19.5 %, </span><em>p</em><span> = 0.048), and nuclear medicine (11.1 % vs. 5.1 %, </span><em>p</em> = 0.044).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Early in their clinical education, medical students prefer certain subspecialties, especially musculoskeletal, body, and breast imaging. Women expressed significantly stronger interest in breast imaging and pediatric radiology, while men indicated significantly stronger interest in body imaging, neuroradiology, and nuclear medicine.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51617,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","volume":"53 2","pages":"Pages 239-242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical student perspectives on radiology subspecialties prior to core clerkship\",\"authors\":\"Alexis M. Medema MScR , Stacy M. Goins BA , Charles M. Maxfield MD , Lars J. Grimm MD, MHS , Robert J. French MD , Jonathan G. Martin MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2023.10.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale and objectives</h3><p>Radiology remains underrepresented in U.S. medical school clinical curricula, and preconceived opinions about the field may impact whether students pursue elective exposure. A core radiology clerkship at one academic institution presents an opportunity to evaluate students’ early preferences for different radiology subspecialties, thus informing curricular design and inspiring student recruitment.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>At a single allopathic medical school, a required, four-week, clinical-year radiology clerkship that occurs in the second year includes immersive one-week experiences in two subspecialties. Prior to their clerkship, students rank their immersion preferences by distributing 100 points across eight fields, the values of which were analyzed as a proxy for interest. A secondary survey was distributed to active first- and second-year medical students to further investigate the factors drawing them to radiology.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Immersive experiences in musculoskeletal, body, and breast imaging were most preferred, earning ≥20 points from 41.6 %, 34.3 %, and 31.9 % of students, respectively. Women were significantly more likely than men to express interest in breast imaging (35.8 % vs. 24.8 %, </span><em>p</em><span> = 0.037) and pediatric radiology (28.8 % vs. 12.8 %, </span><em>p</em> = 0.001). Men were significantly more likely than women to prefer body imaging (41.9 % vs. 30.2 %, <em>p</em><span> = 0.034), neuroradiology (29.1 % vs. 19.5 %, </span><em>p</em><span> = 0.048), and nuclear medicine (11.1 % vs. 5.1 %, </span><em>p</em> = 0.044).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Early in their clinical education, medical students prefer certain subspecialties, especially musculoskeletal, body, and breast imaging. Women expressed significantly stronger interest in breast imaging and pediatric radiology, while men indicated significantly stronger interest in body imaging, neuroradiology, and nuclear medicine.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology\",\"volume\":\"53 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 239-242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363018823001652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363018823001652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Medical student perspectives on radiology subspecialties prior to core clerkship
Rationale and objectives
Radiology remains underrepresented in U.S. medical school clinical curricula, and preconceived opinions about the field may impact whether students pursue elective exposure. A core radiology clerkship at one academic institution presents an opportunity to evaluate students’ early preferences for different radiology subspecialties, thus informing curricular design and inspiring student recruitment.
Materials and methods
At a single allopathic medical school, a required, four-week, clinical-year radiology clerkship that occurs in the second year includes immersive one-week experiences in two subspecialties. Prior to their clerkship, students rank their immersion preferences by distributing 100 points across eight fields, the values of which were analyzed as a proxy for interest. A secondary survey was distributed to active first- and second-year medical students to further investigate the factors drawing them to radiology.
Results
Immersive experiences in musculoskeletal, body, and breast imaging were most preferred, earning ≥20 points from 41.6 %, 34.3 %, and 31.9 % of students, respectively. Women were significantly more likely than men to express interest in breast imaging (35.8 % vs. 24.8 %, p = 0.037) and pediatric radiology (28.8 % vs. 12.8 %, p = 0.001). Men were significantly more likely than women to prefer body imaging (41.9 % vs. 30.2 %, p = 0.034), neuroradiology (29.1 % vs. 19.5 %, p = 0.048), and nuclear medicine (11.1 % vs. 5.1 %, p = 0.044).
Conclusion
Early in their clinical education, medical students prefer certain subspecialties, especially musculoskeletal, body, and breast imaging. Women expressed significantly stronger interest in breast imaging and pediatric radiology, while men indicated significantly stronger interest in body imaging, neuroradiology, and nuclear medicine.
期刊介绍:
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology covers important and controversial topics in radiology. Each issue presents important viewpoints from leading radiologists. High-quality reproductions of radiographs, CT scans, MR images, and sonograms clearly depict what is being described in each article. Also included are valuable updates relevant to other areas of practice, such as medical-legal issues or archiving systems. With new multi-topic format and image-intensive style, Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology offers an outstanding, time-saving investigation into current topics most relevant to radiologists.