EvoLang 11的双盲评估揭示了性别偏见

IF 2.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Journal of Language Evolution Pub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI:10.1093/JOLE/LZW009

Seán G. Roberts, T. Verhoef

{"title":"EvoLang 11的双盲评估揭示了性别偏见","authors":"Seán G. Roberts, T. Verhoef","doi":"10.1093/JOLE/LZW009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impact of introducing double-blind reviewing in the most recent Evolution of Language conference is assessed. The ranking of papers is compared between EvoLang 11 (double-blind review) and EvoLang 9 and 10 (single-blind review). Main effects were found for first author gender by conference. The results mirror some findings in the literature on the effects of double-blind review, suggesting that it helps reduce a bias against female authors.","PeriodicalId":37118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Evolution","volume":"1 1","pages":"163-167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Double-blind reviewing at EvoLang 11 reveals gender bias\",\"authors\":\"Seán G. Roberts, T. Verhoef\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/JOLE/LZW009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The impact of introducing double-blind reviewing in the most recent Evolution of Language conference is assessed. The ranking of papers is compared between EvoLang 11 (double-blind review) and EvoLang 9 and 10 (single-blind review). Main effects were found for first author gender by conference. The results mirror some findings in the literature on the effects of double-blind review, suggesting that it helps reduce a bias against female authors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language Evolution\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"163-167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"53\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/JOLE/LZW009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JOLE/LZW009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 53

摘要

在最近的语言演变会议上，对引入双盲评审的影响进行了评估。论文排名比较EvoLang 11(双盲评审)和EvoLang 9、10(单盲评审)。主要影响因素为会议第一作者性别。研究结果反映了文献中关于双盲评价效果的一些发现，表明双盲评价有助于减少对女性作者的偏见。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Double-blind reviewing at EvoLang 11 reveals gender bias

The impact of introducing double-blind reviewing in the most recent Evolution of Language conference is assessed. The ranking of papers is compared between EvoLang 11 (double-blind review) and EvoLang 9 and 10 (single-blind review). Main effects were found for first author gender by conference. The results mirror some findings in the literature on the effects of double-blind review, suggesting that it helps reduce a bias against female authors.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Language Evolution Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

7.70%

发文量