A. D’Amato, Stacy J. Troumbly, M. R. Saunders, K. Puettmann, M. Albers
{"title":"云杉芽虫影响林分间伐后青云杉的生长和存活","authors":"A. D’Amato, Stacy J. Troumbly, M. R. Saunders, K. Puettmann, M. Albers","doi":"10.1093/NJAF/28.2.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"intervals throughout eastern North America (Taylor and MacLean 2008) and continued for up to 15 years (Kucera and Orr 1981, Magnussen et al. 2005, Hennigar et al. 2007). In the past, pesticides and biological control agents were commonly used to maintain the productivity of infested sites (Mason and Paul 1996, Sheehan 1996); however, the minimal long-term success and the cost of these treatments have led to the search for less costly alternatives, such as thinning. Unfortunately, few studies have examined the effectiveness of thinning at minimizing mortality from SBW. Also, these studies have focused on the primary host species, balsam fir (Crook et al. 1979, Bauce 1996), leaving a limited understanding of the effectiveness of this approach for spruce-dominated systems. Furthermore, studies evaluating the effectiveness of thinning in reducing the impact of SBW have found varying results. For example, studies in young balsam fir stands have suggested that thinning treatments may elevate the severity of SBW by increasing host vigor (MacLean and Piene 1995). On the other hand, studies in older mixed conifer stands in the western United States have demonstrated that thinning may have beneficial effects in reducing western SBW populations in infested stands (Carlson et al. 1985). There is a well-documented history of SBW outbreaks in eastern North America, with each lasting 7–17 years and separated by 30–60 years of no activity (Colson and Witter 1984). Interestingly, the most recent outbreak in Minnesota started in 1954 and has lasted across the forested landscapes in this region for over 55 years (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources [MNDNR] 2008). Potential explanations for the extended duration of this outbreak include an increased abundance of balsam fir due to the maturation of postlogging mixed aspen-balsam fir stands, as well as the fragmentation and homogenization of the landscape due to past land use (Sturtevant et al. 2004). In the 1990s, SBW began targeting white spruce, causing substantial top kill and mortality, particularly in white spruce plantations across Minnesota and other portions of the Lake States region (MNDNR 1996, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources [WDNR] 2006). White spruce plantations cover over 72,000 ha of commercial forestland across the northern Lake States (Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin; Rauscher 1984), suggesting a need to evaluate silvicultural strategies that might minimize effects of SBW outbreaks on stand productivity in a cost-effective manner. To address this need, this study investigates the relationships between thinning treatments applied to white spruce plantations affected by SBW and changes in individual tree and stand-level growth, canopy structure, and survivorship. Specific questions included the following: (1) Does thinning increase survivorship in stands affected by SBW? (2) Does thinning increase stand volume growth in stands affected by SBW through changes in foliage patterns (live crown ratio and foliage density)? (3) What factors are most important for predicting postthinning growth responses of individual white spruce in plantations affected by SBW?","PeriodicalId":19281,"journal":{"name":"Northern Journal of Applied Forestry","volume":"28 1","pages":"72-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/NJAF/28.2.72","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growth and Survival of Picea glauca following Thinning of Plantations Affected by Eastern Spruce Budworm\",\"authors\":\"A. D’Amato, Stacy J. Troumbly, M. R. Saunders, K. Puettmann, M. Albers\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/NJAF/28.2.72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"intervals throughout eastern North America (Taylor and MacLean 2008) and continued for up to 15 years (Kucera and Orr 1981, Magnussen et al. 2005, Hennigar et al. 2007). In the past, pesticides and biological control agents were commonly used to maintain the productivity of infested sites (Mason and Paul 1996, Sheehan 1996); however, the minimal long-term success and the cost of these treatments have led to the search for less costly alternatives, such as thinning. Unfortunately, few studies have examined the effectiveness of thinning at minimizing mortality from SBW. Also, these studies have focused on the primary host species, balsam fir (Crook et al. 1979, Bauce 1996), leaving a limited understanding of the effectiveness of this approach for spruce-dominated systems. Furthermore, studies evaluating the effectiveness of thinning in reducing the impact of SBW have found varying results. For example, studies in young balsam fir stands have suggested that thinning treatments may elevate the severity of SBW by increasing host vigor (MacLean and Piene 1995). On the other hand, studies in older mixed conifer stands in the western United States have demonstrated that thinning may have beneficial effects in reducing western SBW populations in infested stands (Carlson et al. 1985). There is a well-documented history of SBW outbreaks in eastern North America, with each lasting 7–17 years and separated by 30–60 years of no activity (Colson and Witter 1984). Interestingly, the most recent outbreak in Minnesota started in 1954 and has lasted across the forested landscapes in this region for over 55 years (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources [MNDNR] 2008). Potential explanations for the extended duration of this outbreak include an increased abundance of balsam fir due to the maturation of postlogging mixed aspen-balsam fir stands, as well as the fragmentation and homogenization of the landscape due to past land use (Sturtevant et al. 2004). In the 1990s, SBW began targeting white spruce, causing substantial top kill and mortality, particularly in white spruce plantations across Minnesota and other portions of the Lake States region (MNDNR 1996, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources [WDNR] 2006). White spruce plantations cover over 72,000 ha of commercial forestland across the northern Lake States (Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin; Rauscher 1984), suggesting a need to evaluate silvicultural strategies that might minimize effects of SBW outbreaks on stand productivity in a cost-effective manner. To address this need, this study investigates the relationships between thinning treatments applied to white spruce plantations affected by SBW and changes in individual tree and stand-level growth, canopy structure, and survivorship. Specific questions included the following: (1) Does thinning increase survivorship in stands affected by SBW? (2) Does thinning increase stand volume growth in stands affected by SBW through changes in foliage patterns (live crown ratio and foliage density)? (3) What factors are most important for predicting postthinning growth responses of individual white spruce in plantations affected by SBW?\",\"PeriodicalId\":19281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Northern Journal of Applied Forestry\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"72-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/NJAF/28.2.72\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Northern Journal of Applied Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/NJAF/28.2.72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern Journal of Applied Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/NJAF/28.2.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
摘要
整个北美东部的间隔时间(Taylor and MacLean 2008),并持续长达15年(kuucera and Orr 1981, Magnussen et al. 2005, Hennigar et al. 2007)。过去,通常使用杀虫剂和生物防治剂来维持受感染地点的生产力(Mason和Paul 1996年,Sheehan 1996年);然而,这些治疗方法的长期效果和成本都很低,这促使人们寻找成本更低的替代方法,比如减薄。不幸的是,很少有研究检验减薄在减少SBW死亡率方面的有效性。此外,这些研究主要集中在主要寄主物种香脂冷杉上(Crook et al. 1979, Bauce 1996),对这种方法在云杉为主的系统中的有效性了解有限。此外,评估疏林在减少SBW影响方面的有效性的研究发现了不同的结果。例如,对幼龄香脂冷杉林的研究表明,间伐处理可能通过增加寄主活力来提高SBW的严重程度(MacLean和Piene 1995)。另一方面,对美国西部较老的混合针叶林的研究表明,间伐可能对减少西部受侵染林分中的SBW种群有有益影响(Carlson et al. 1985)。在北美东部,有详细记录的小蠊疾病暴发历史,每次持续7-17年,间隔30-60年无活动(Colson和Witter 1984年)。有趣的是,明尼苏达州最近一次爆发始于1954年,并在该地区的森林景观中持续了55年以上(明尼苏达州自然资源部[mnndnr] 2008)。此次暴发持续时间延长的可能解释包括,由于采伐后白杨-香脂冷杉混交林的成熟,香脂冷杉的丰度增加,以及由于过去的土地利用导致景观破碎化和同质化(Sturtevant et al. 2004)。在20世纪90年代,SBW开始以白云杉为目标,造成大量的顶杀和死亡,特别是在明尼苏达州和其他部分湖州地区的白云杉种植园(MNDNR 1996,威斯康星州自然资源部[WDNR] 2006)。白云杉种植园覆盖了北部湖泊州(密歇根州,明尼苏达州和威斯康星州)超过72,000公顷的商业林地;Rauscher 1984),这表明有必要评估可能以具有成本效益的方式最大限度地减少SBW暴发对林分生产力影响的造林战略。为了解决这一需求,本研究调查了受SBW影响的白云杉人工林间伐处理与单株和林分生长、冠层结构和成活率变化之间的关系。具体问题包括:(1)间伐是否能提高受SBW影响林分的存活率?(2)疏伐是否通过改变林分的叶型(活冠比和叶密度)增加了受SBW影响林分的林分体积增长?(3)哪些因子对预测林下白云杉单株间伐后的生长响应最为重要?
Growth and Survival of Picea glauca following Thinning of Plantations Affected by Eastern Spruce Budworm
intervals throughout eastern North America (Taylor and MacLean 2008) and continued for up to 15 years (Kucera and Orr 1981, Magnussen et al. 2005, Hennigar et al. 2007). In the past, pesticides and biological control agents were commonly used to maintain the productivity of infested sites (Mason and Paul 1996, Sheehan 1996); however, the minimal long-term success and the cost of these treatments have led to the search for less costly alternatives, such as thinning. Unfortunately, few studies have examined the effectiveness of thinning at minimizing mortality from SBW. Also, these studies have focused on the primary host species, balsam fir (Crook et al. 1979, Bauce 1996), leaving a limited understanding of the effectiveness of this approach for spruce-dominated systems. Furthermore, studies evaluating the effectiveness of thinning in reducing the impact of SBW have found varying results. For example, studies in young balsam fir stands have suggested that thinning treatments may elevate the severity of SBW by increasing host vigor (MacLean and Piene 1995). On the other hand, studies in older mixed conifer stands in the western United States have demonstrated that thinning may have beneficial effects in reducing western SBW populations in infested stands (Carlson et al. 1985). There is a well-documented history of SBW outbreaks in eastern North America, with each lasting 7–17 years and separated by 30–60 years of no activity (Colson and Witter 1984). Interestingly, the most recent outbreak in Minnesota started in 1954 and has lasted across the forested landscapes in this region for over 55 years (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources [MNDNR] 2008). Potential explanations for the extended duration of this outbreak include an increased abundance of balsam fir due to the maturation of postlogging mixed aspen-balsam fir stands, as well as the fragmentation and homogenization of the landscape due to past land use (Sturtevant et al. 2004). In the 1990s, SBW began targeting white spruce, causing substantial top kill and mortality, particularly in white spruce plantations across Minnesota and other portions of the Lake States region (MNDNR 1996, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources [WDNR] 2006). White spruce plantations cover over 72,000 ha of commercial forestland across the northern Lake States (Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin; Rauscher 1984), suggesting a need to evaluate silvicultural strategies that might minimize effects of SBW outbreaks on stand productivity in a cost-effective manner. To address this need, this study investigates the relationships between thinning treatments applied to white spruce plantations affected by SBW and changes in individual tree and stand-level growth, canopy structure, and survivorship. Specific questions included the following: (1) Does thinning increase survivorship in stands affected by SBW? (2) Does thinning increase stand volume growth in stands affected by SBW through changes in foliage patterns (live crown ratio and foliage density)? (3) What factors are most important for predicting postthinning growth responses of individual white spruce in plantations affected by SBW?