制备二氧化硅浊度标准品的简便方法。

E. C. Levy
{"title":"制备二氧化硅浊度标准品的简便方法。","authors":"E. C. Levy","doi":"10.1093/INFDIS/3.SUPPLEMENT_2.S149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the candle or electric light turbidimeter has largely replaced comparison with silica standards as a laboratory method of determining the turbidity of water, these instruments, equipped with the usual short tube, are of use only where the turbidity is above 100, while the platinum wire method is applicable only in field work. Even there its use is limited to waters of neither very high nor very low turbidity, besides which there is not infrequently great difficulty in securing the necessary conditions of light. Direct comparison with silica standards is, therefore, the method which must be resorted to in most cases where the turbidity is below 100. Of all standards used by the water analyst, the silica turbidity standard is the most difficult to prepare. Even after the very tedious preparation of the diatomaceous silica itself, the powder so obtained is not always of the required degree of fineness, thus necessitating standardization by the platinum wire method or by use of the candle turbidimeter, instead of simply adding a gram per liter as originally recommended, to secure a standard of 1,000 parts turbidity per million.","PeriodicalId":88306,"journal":{"name":"Public health papers and reports","volume":"31 Pt 2 1","pages":"149-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1906-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/INFDIS/3.SUPPLEMENT_2.S149","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Ready Method for Preparing a Silica Turbidity Standard.\",\"authors\":\"E. C. Levy\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/INFDIS/3.SUPPLEMENT_2.S149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although the candle or electric light turbidimeter has largely replaced comparison with silica standards as a laboratory method of determining the turbidity of water, these instruments, equipped with the usual short tube, are of use only where the turbidity is above 100, while the platinum wire method is applicable only in field work. Even there its use is limited to waters of neither very high nor very low turbidity, besides which there is not infrequently great difficulty in securing the necessary conditions of light. Direct comparison with silica standards is, therefore, the method which must be resorted to in most cases where the turbidity is below 100. Of all standards used by the water analyst, the silica turbidity standard is the most difficult to prepare. Even after the very tedious preparation of the diatomaceous silica itself, the powder so obtained is not always of the required degree of fineness, thus necessitating standardization by the platinum wire method or by use of the candle turbidimeter, instead of simply adding a gram per liter as originally recommended, to secure a standard of 1,000 parts turbidity per million.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public health papers and reports\",\"volume\":\"31 Pt 2 1\",\"pages\":\"149-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1906-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/INFDIS/3.SUPPLEMENT_2.S149\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public health papers and reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/INFDIS/3.SUPPLEMENT_2.S149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public health papers and reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/INFDIS/3.SUPPLEMENT_2.S149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然蜡烛或电光浊度计已经在很大程度上取代了二氧化硅标准作为测定水浊度的实验室方法,但这些仪器配备了通常的短管,仅在浊度高于100的地方使用,而铂线法仅适用于野外工作。即使在那里,它的使用也仅限于既不是很高也不是很低浑浊的水,除此之外,在确保必要的光条件方面经常存在很大的困难。因此,在浊度低于100的大多数情况下,必须采用直接与二氧化硅标准进行比较的方法。在水分析人员使用的所有标准中,二氧化硅浊度标准是最难制备的。即使经过非常繁琐的硅藻土二氧化硅本身的制备,这样得到的粉末并不总是达到所需的细度,因此需要通过铂丝法或使用蜡烛浊度计进行标准化,而不是像最初建议的那样简单地每升添加一克,以确保浊度为千万分之一的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Ready Method for Preparing a Silica Turbidity Standard.
Although the candle or electric light turbidimeter has largely replaced comparison with silica standards as a laboratory method of determining the turbidity of water, these instruments, equipped with the usual short tube, are of use only where the turbidity is above 100, while the platinum wire method is applicable only in field work. Even there its use is limited to waters of neither very high nor very low turbidity, besides which there is not infrequently great difficulty in securing the necessary conditions of light. Direct comparison with silica standards is, therefore, the method which must be resorted to in most cases where the turbidity is below 100. Of all standards used by the water analyst, the silica turbidity standard is the most difficult to prepare. Even after the very tedious preparation of the diatomaceous silica itself, the powder so obtained is not always of the required degree of fineness, thus necessitating standardization by the platinum wire method or by use of the candle turbidimeter, instead of simply adding a gram per liter as originally recommended, to secure a standard of 1,000 parts turbidity per million.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信