强制性早产:在三级转诊中心的流行和影响

W. Fronterhouse, F. Christensen, L. Rayburn, G. Gilson, L. Curet, W. Rayburn
{"title":"强制性早产:在三级转诊中心的流行和影响","authors":"W. Fronterhouse, F. Christensen, L. Rayburn, G. Gilson, L. Curet, W. Rayburn","doi":"10.1080/jmf.10.3.162.165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective : To determine the prevalence and impact of mandated preterm deliveries at a tertiary referral center. Methods : A chart review was conducted at our institution on all livebirths from 24 weeks to completion of 37 weeks' gestation between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 1999. Mandated delivery was defined as intentional intervention because of a deteriorating maternal or fetal condition. Reasons for intervention and intrapartum courses were compared with two other preterm groups (premature ruptured membranes, spontaneous labor) delivering during the same period. Statistical analyses included the Student t test, univariate ANOVA, h 2 test and Mann-Whitney test. Results : A total of 894 pregnancies delivered preterm, with 132 (14.8%) being mandated. Primary reasons for mandated delivery included severe pre-eclampsia (69.0%), vaginal bleeding (11.4%), deteriorating maternal illness (10.6%), worsening fetal growth restriction (6.1%) or major fetal malformation (3.0%). Delivery at less than 34 weeks was more common in the mandated group (68.9%) than in the ruptured membranes group (41.2%, p < 0.005) or in the spontaneous labor group (46.5%; p < 0.01). Cesarean section rates were higher in the mandated group (69.7%) than in the ruptured membranes group (18.3%; p < 0.001) or in the spontaneous labor group (21.5%; p < 0.001). The presence of an unfavorable cervix, unsuccessful trial of labor, non-cephalic fetal presentation, or fetal intolerance of labor explained the high rate of surgery. Conclusions : Conditions mandating delivery accounted for 14.8% of all preterm births. Mandated delivery is associated with a greater need for delivery before 34 weeks, often by Cesarean section.","PeriodicalId":79464,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"162 - 165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/jmf.10.3.162.165","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mandated preterm delivery: its prevalence and impact at a tertiary referral center\",\"authors\":\"W. Fronterhouse, F. Christensen, L. Rayburn, G. Gilson, L. Curet, W. Rayburn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/jmf.10.3.162.165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective : To determine the prevalence and impact of mandated preterm deliveries at a tertiary referral center. Methods : A chart review was conducted at our institution on all livebirths from 24 weeks to completion of 37 weeks' gestation between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 1999. Mandated delivery was defined as intentional intervention because of a deteriorating maternal or fetal condition. Reasons for intervention and intrapartum courses were compared with two other preterm groups (premature ruptured membranes, spontaneous labor) delivering during the same period. Statistical analyses included the Student t test, univariate ANOVA, h 2 test and Mann-Whitney test. Results : A total of 894 pregnancies delivered preterm, with 132 (14.8%) being mandated. Primary reasons for mandated delivery included severe pre-eclampsia (69.0%), vaginal bleeding (11.4%), deteriorating maternal illness (10.6%), worsening fetal growth restriction (6.1%) or major fetal malformation (3.0%). Delivery at less than 34 weeks was more common in the mandated group (68.9%) than in the ruptured membranes group (41.2%, p < 0.005) or in the spontaneous labor group (46.5%; p < 0.01). Cesarean section rates were higher in the mandated group (69.7%) than in the ruptured membranes group (18.3%; p < 0.001) or in the spontaneous labor group (21.5%; p < 0.001). The presence of an unfavorable cervix, unsuccessful trial of labor, non-cephalic fetal presentation, or fetal intolerance of labor explained the high rate of surgery. Conclusions : Conditions mandating delivery accounted for 14.8% of all preterm births. Mandated delivery is associated with a greater need for delivery before 34 weeks, often by Cesarean section.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"162 - 165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/jmf.10.3.162.165\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/jmf.10.3.162.165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/jmf.10.3.162.165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的:确定三级转诊中心强制早产的患病率和影响。方法:对我院1998年1月1日至1999年12月31日期间所有24周至37周的活产婴儿进行图表回顾。强制分娩被定义为由于母体或胎儿状况恶化而故意干预。将干预原因及产时过程与同期分娩的其他两组早产儿(胎膜早破、自然分娩)进行比较。统计分析包括Student t检验、单变量方差分析、h 2检验和Mann-Whitney检验。结果:894例早产,其中132例(14.8%)为强制妊娠。强制分娩的主要原因包括严重先兆子痫(69.0%)、阴道出血(11.4%)、孕产妇疾病恶化(10.6%)、胎儿生长受限恶化(6.1%)或胎儿严重畸形(3.0%)。少于34周分娩在强制分娩组(68.9%)比破膜组(41.2%,p < 0.005)和自然分娩组(46.5%;P < 0.01)。强制组剖宫产率(69.7%)高于破膜组(18.3%;P < 0.001)或自然分娩组(21.5%;P < 0.001)。宫颈不利、分娩试验不成功、胎儿非头位或胎儿对分娩不耐受的存在解释了手术的高发生率。结论:强制分娩条件占所有早产的14.8%。强制分娩与更需要在34周前分娩有关,通常通过剖宫产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mandated preterm delivery: its prevalence and impact at a tertiary referral center
Objective : To determine the prevalence and impact of mandated preterm deliveries at a tertiary referral center. Methods : A chart review was conducted at our institution on all livebirths from 24 weeks to completion of 37 weeks' gestation between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 1999. Mandated delivery was defined as intentional intervention because of a deteriorating maternal or fetal condition. Reasons for intervention and intrapartum courses were compared with two other preterm groups (premature ruptured membranes, spontaneous labor) delivering during the same period. Statistical analyses included the Student t test, univariate ANOVA, h 2 test and Mann-Whitney test. Results : A total of 894 pregnancies delivered preterm, with 132 (14.8%) being mandated. Primary reasons for mandated delivery included severe pre-eclampsia (69.0%), vaginal bleeding (11.4%), deteriorating maternal illness (10.6%), worsening fetal growth restriction (6.1%) or major fetal malformation (3.0%). Delivery at less than 34 weeks was more common in the mandated group (68.9%) than in the ruptured membranes group (41.2%, p < 0.005) or in the spontaneous labor group (46.5%; p < 0.01). Cesarean section rates were higher in the mandated group (69.7%) than in the ruptured membranes group (18.3%; p < 0.001) or in the spontaneous labor group (21.5%; p < 0.001). The presence of an unfavorable cervix, unsuccessful trial of labor, non-cephalic fetal presentation, or fetal intolerance of labor explained the high rate of surgery. Conclusions : Conditions mandating delivery accounted for 14.8% of all preterm births. Mandated delivery is associated with a greater need for delivery before 34 weeks, often by Cesarean section.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信