母胎医学实践特点会影响普通妇产科医生的高危转诊决定吗?

A. Vintzileos, C. Ananth, J. Smulian, W. Scorza, R. Knuppel
{"title":"母胎医学实践特点会影响普通妇产科医生的高危转诊决定吗?","authors":"A. Vintzileos, C. Ananth, J. Smulian, W. Scorza, R. Knuppel","doi":"10.1080/jmf.10.2.112.115-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective : To determine whether the decision of the general obstetrician-gynecologist to refer high-risk obstetric patients depends on the type of practice of the maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) specialist. Methods : A questionnaire was mailed to 935 general obstetrician-gynecologists who were asked whether the MFM specialist's practice characteristics would influence their decision to refer their high-risk obstetric patients. Potential MFM practice components presented in the survey included: MFM, high-risk obstetrics, low-risk obstetrics or general obstetrics and gynecology. Results : A total of 140 (15%) general obstetrician-gynecologists responded, 110 of whom were practicing obstetrics. Of the practicing responders, 77% stated that they were more likely to refer their high-risk obstetric patients if the MFM specialist practiced only MFM and high-risk obstetrics; 69% were less likely to refer their patients when the MFM specialist, in addition to MFM, practiced general obstetrics; and 75% were less likely to refer their patients when the MFM specialist also practiced general obstetrics and gynecology. The MFM practice setting (university vs. community hospital vs. private practice), as well as the geographic location and years of practice of the respondents, did not influence the general obstetrician-gynecologists' decision to refer their high-risk obstetric patients. Conclusion : General obstetrician-gynecologists are more likely to refer high-risk obstetric patients if the MFM specialist practiced only MFM and high-risk obstetrics.","PeriodicalId":79464,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"112 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/jmf.10.2.112.115-7","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do maternal-fetal medicine practice characteristics influence high-risk referral decisions by general obstetrician-gynecologists?\",\"authors\":\"A. Vintzileos, C. Ananth, J. Smulian, W. Scorza, R. Knuppel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/jmf.10.2.112.115-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective : To determine whether the decision of the general obstetrician-gynecologist to refer high-risk obstetric patients depends on the type of practice of the maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) specialist. Methods : A questionnaire was mailed to 935 general obstetrician-gynecologists who were asked whether the MFM specialist's practice characteristics would influence their decision to refer their high-risk obstetric patients. Potential MFM practice components presented in the survey included: MFM, high-risk obstetrics, low-risk obstetrics or general obstetrics and gynecology. Results : A total of 140 (15%) general obstetrician-gynecologists responded, 110 of whom were practicing obstetrics. Of the practicing responders, 77% stated that they were more likely to refer their high-risk obstetric patients if the MFM specialist practiced only MFM and high-risk obstetrics; 69% were less likely to refer their patients when the MFM specialist, in addition to MFM, practiced general obstetrics; and 75% were less likely to refer their patients when the MFM specialist also practiced general obstetrics and gynecology. The MFM practice setting (university vs. community hospital vs. private practice), as well as the geographic location and years of practice of the respondents, did not influence the general obstetrician-gynecologists' decision to refer their high-risk obstetric patients. Conclusion : General obstetrician-gynecologists are more likely to refer high-risk obstetric patients if the MFM specialist practiced only MFM and high-risk obstetrics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"112 - 115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/jmf.10.2.112.115-7\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/jmf.10.2.112.115-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/jmf.10.2.112.115-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨普通妇产科医生转诊高危产科患者的决定是否取决于母胎医学专科医生的执业类型。方法:向935名普通妇产科医生邮寄问卷,询问MFM专科医生的执业特点是否会影响他们转诊高危产科患者的决定。调查中提出的潜在产科护理实践组成部分包括:产科护理、高危产科、低风险产科或普通妇产科。结果:共有140名(15%)普通妇产科医生回应,其中110名是产科执业医师。在执业应答者中,77%的人表示,如果MFM专家只执业MFM和高风险产科,他们更有可能转诊高危产科患者;当MFM专家除MFM外还从事普通产科时,69%的人不太可能转诊他们的病人;当MFM专家也从事普通妇产科时,75%的人不太可能转诊他们的病人。MFM的实践设置(大学vs.社区医院vs.私人实践),以及受访者的地理位置和实践年数,不影响一般妇产科医生转诊高危产科患者的决定。结论:如果MFM专科医生只从事MFM和高危产科,普通妇产科医生更有可能转诊高危产科患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do maternal-fetal medicine practice characteristics influence high-risk referral decisions by general obstetrician-gynecologists?
Objective : To determine whether the decision of the general obstetrician-gynecologist to refer high-risk obstetric patients depends on the type of practice of the maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) specialist. Methods : A questionnaire was mailed to 935 general obstetrician-gynecologists who were asked whether the MFM specialist's practice characteristics would influence their decision to refer their high-risk obstetric patients. Potential MFM practice components presented in the survey included: MFM, high-risk obstetrics, low-risk obstetrics or general obstetrics and gynecology. Results : A total of 140 (15%) general obstetrician-gynecologists responded, 110 of whom were practicing obstetrics. Of the practicing responders, 77% stated that they were more likely to refer their high-risk obstetric patients if the MFM specialist practiced only MFM and high-risk obstetrics; 69% were less likely to refer their patients when the MFM specialist, in addition to MFM, practiced general obstetrics; and 75% were less likely to refer their patients when the MFM specialist also practiced general obstetrics and gynecology. The MFM practice setting (university vs. community hospital vs. private practice), as well as the geographic location and years of practice of the respondents, did not influence the general obstetrician-gynecologists' decision to refer their high-risk obstetric patients. Conclusion : General obstetrician-gynecologists are more likely to refer high-risk obstetric patients if the MFM specialist practiced only MFM and high-risk obstetrics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信