B. Furman, I. Shoham-Vardi, A. Bashiri, O. Erez, M. Mazor
{"title":"早产胎膜早破不是新生儿发病的独立危险因素","authors":"B. Furman, I. Shoham-Vardi, A. Bashiri, O. Erez, M. Mazor","doi":"10.1080/jmf.10.2.107.111-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective : To evaluate the risk factors for development of neonatal morbidity in cases of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). Methods : The study population consisted of 2326 singleton preterm births occurring between 1994 and 1997 at Soroka University Medical Center. The neonatal morbidity included respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage (grade III-IV), necrotizing enterocolitis, periventricular leukomalacia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, neonatal pneumonia and sepsis. A cross-sectional study was designed to compare neonatal morbidity between two groups: the study group consisted of patients with PPROM ( n = 376) and the comparison group of patients without PPROM ( n = 1950). Results : The prevalence of the neonatal morbidity associated with PPROM was 13.0% (49/376). There was no statistically significant difference in neonatal morbidity rates between the PPROM group and the group with intact membranes in any of the birth-weight groups (Mantel-Haenszel weighted odds ratio 1.20; 95% CI 0.80-1.20), or gestational-age groups (Mantel-Haenszel weighted odds ratio 1.03; 95% CI 0.79-1.55). There was no statistically significant difference in neonatal morbidity between patients with PPROM and those with intact membranes according to clinical chorioamnionitis. Congenital anomalies did not influence the neonatal morbidity when comparing patients with and without PPROM (44.4% vs. 32.8%, respectively; p = 0.23). Conclusions : PPROM was not an independent risk factor for neonatal morbidity in preterm births. Neonatal morbidity was affected mainly by prematurity itself, rather than by the occurrence of PPROM.","PeriodicalId":79464,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"107 - 111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/jmf.10.2.107.111-6","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preterm premature rupture of membranes is not an independent risk factor for neonatal morbidity\",\"authors\":\"B. Furman, I. Shoham-Vardi, A. Bashiri, O. Erez, M. Mazor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/jmf.10.2.107.111-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective : To evaluate the risk factors for development of neonatal morbidity in cases of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). Methods : The study population consisted of 2326 singleton preterm births occurring between 1994 and 1997 at Soroka University Medical Center. The neonatal morbidity included respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage (grade III-IV), necrotizing enterocolitis, periventricular leukomalacia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, neonatal pneumonia and sepsis. A cross-sectional study was designed to compare neonatal morbidity between two groups: the study group consisted of patients with PPROM ( n = 376) and the comparison group of patients without PPROM ( n = 1950). Results : The prevalence of the neonatal morbidity associated with PPROM was 13.0% (49/376). There was no statistically significant difference in neonatal morbidity rates between the PPROM group and the group with intact membranes in any of the birth-weight groups (Mantel-Haenszel weighted odds ratio 1.20; 95% CI 0.80-1.20), or gestational-age groups (Mantel-Haenszel weighted odds ratio 1.03; 95% CI 0.79-1.55). There was no statistically significant difference in neonatal morbidity between patients with PPROM and those with intact membranes according to clinical chorioamnionitis. Congenital anomalies did not influence the neonatal morbidity when comparing patients with and without PPROM (44.4% vs. 32.8%, respectively; p = 0.23). Conclusions : PPROM was not an independent risk factor for neonatal morbidity in preterm births. Neonatal morbidity was affected mainly by prematurity itself, rather than by the occurrence of PPROM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"107 - 111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/jmf.10.2.107.111-6\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/jmf.10.2.107.111-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/jmf.10.2.107.111-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
摘要
目的:探讨早产胎膜早破(PPROM)新生儿发病的危险因素。方法:研究人群包括1994年至1997年在索罗卡大学医学中心发生的2326例单胎早产儿。新生儿发病率包括呼吸窘迫综合征、脑室内出血(III-IV级)、坏死性小肠结肠炎、脑室周围白质软化、支气管肺发育不良、新生儿肺炎和败血症。设计了一项横断面研究来比较两组之间的新生儿发病率:研究组由PPROM患者组成(n = 376),对照组由无PPROM患者组成(n = 1950)。结果:新生儿与PPROM相关的发病率为13.0%(49/376)。在任何出生体重组中,PPROM组与膜完整组的新生儿发病率均无统计学差异(Mantel-Haenszel加权优势比1.20;95% CI 0.80-1.20)或胎龄组(Mantel-Haenszel加权优势比1.03;95% ci 0.79-1.55)。根据临床绒毛膜羊膜炎,PPROM患者与膜完整患者的新生儿发病率无统计学差异。先天性异常对PPROM患者和未PPROM患者的新生儿发病率没有影响(分别为44.4%和32.8%);P = 0.23)。结论:PPROM不是早产儿新生儿发病的独立危险因素。影响新生儿发病率的主要因素是早产本身,而非PPROM的发生。
Preterm premature rupture of membranes is not an independent risk factor for neonatal morbidity
Objective : To evaluate the risk factors for development of neonatal morbidity in cases of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). Methods : The study population consisted of 2326 singleton preterm births occurring between 1994 and 1997 at Soroka University Medical Center. The neonatal morbidity included respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage (grade III-IV), necrotizing enterocolitis, periventricular leukomalacia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, neonatal pneumonia and sepsis. A cross-sectional study was designed to compare neonatal morbidity between two groups: the study group consisted of patients with PPROM ( n = 376) and the comparison group of patients without PPROM ( n = 1950). Results : The prevalence of the neonatal morbidity associated with PPROM was 13.0% (49/376). There was no statistically significant difference in neonatal morbidity rates between the PPROM group and the group with intact membranes in any of the birth-weight groups (Mantel-Haenszel weighted odds ratio 1.20; 95% CI 0.80-1.20), or gestational-age groups (Mantel-Haenszel weighted odds ratio 1.03; 95% CI 0.79-1.55). There was no statistically significant difference in neonatal morbidity between patients with PPROM and those with intact membranes according to clinical chorioamnionitis. Congenital anomalies did not influence the neonatal morbidity when comparing patients with and without PPROM (44.4% vs. 32.8%, respectively; p = 0.23). Conclusions : PPROM was not an independent risk factor for neonatal morbidity in preterm births. Neonatal morbidity was affected mainly by prematurity itself, rather than by the occurrence of PPROM.