信仰与医学的创伤,悖论的慰藉

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
P. Tyson
{"title":"信仰与医学的创伤,悖论的慰藉","authors":"P. Tyson","doi":"10.1093/CB/CBU028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is written by the parent of two babies who died in infancy from an untreatable congenital illness. The author is a Christian and the article focuses on the manner in which parental prayers for a miracle, hospital care, and church affiliation interacted in this context. While the care of church and hospital was a deep boon, nevertheless, the collision and-even more so-the collusion between the reality outlooks, epistemic assumptions, and authority structures of the church and the hospital produced what I will call the wounds of faith and the wounds of medicine. A balm does not remove a scar, nor does it restore a limb that is amputated. But a balm sees a wound for what it is and enables the sufferer to live with that wound. In this analogy, the balm refuses to provide an \"answer\" that dissolves either the wound of faith or the wound of medicine. An appreciation of paradox-both in the context of faith and the context of medicine-is the only balm that this author has found to be healing. Yet, the paradox is profoundly problematic to both faith and medicine in the modern Western context. This article concludes with an attempt to understand why the very idea of the paradoxical is so hard for us modern Western people to recognize, let alone live with constructively.","PeriodicalId":42894,"journal":{"name":"Christian Bioethics","volume":"20 1","pages":"330-358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/CB/CBU028","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Wounds of Faith and Medicine, and the Balm of Paradox\",\"authors\":\"P. Tyson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/CB/CBU028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is written by the parent of two babies who died in infancy from an untreatable congenital illness. The author is a Christian and the article focuses on the manner in which parental prayers for a miracle, hospital care, and church affiliation interacted in this context. While the care of church and hospital was a deep boon, nevertheless, the collision and-even more so-the collusion between the reality outlooks, epistemic assumptions, and authority structures of the church and the hospital produced what I will call the wounds of faith and the wounds of medicine. A balm does not remove a scar, nor does it restore a limb that is amputated. But a balm sees a wound for what it is and enables the sufferer to live with that wound. In this analogy, the balm refuses to provide an \\\"answer\\\" that dissolves either the wound of faith or the wound of medicine. An appreciation of paradox-both in the context of faith and the context of medicine-is the only balm that this author has found to be healing. Yet, the paradox is profoundly problematic to both faith and medicine in the modern Western context. This article concludes with an attempt to understand why the very idea of the paradoxical is so hard for us modern Western people to recognize, let alone live with constructively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Christian Bioethics\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"330-358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/CB/CBU028\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Christian Bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/CB/CBU028\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christian Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/CB/CBU028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇文章是由两个孩子的父母写的,他们在婴儿期死于一种无法治愈的先天性疾病。作者是一名基督徒,文章的重点是父母祈祷奇迹的方式,医院护理和教会隶属关系在这种情况下相互作用。虽然对教会和医院的照顾是一种深刻的恩惠,然而,教会和医院的现实观、认知假设和权威结构之间的碰撞——甚至更严重的是——相互勾结产生了我称之为信仰之伤和医学之伤的东西。软膏不能去除疤痕,也不能恢复被截肢的肢体。但药膏能看清伤口的本来面目,让受伤者带着伤口生活下去。在这个比喻中,香膏拒绝提供一个“答案”,既不解决信仰的创伤,也不解决医学的创伤。在信仰和医学的背景下,对悖论的欣赏是作者发现的唯一的治疗方法。然而,在现代西方背景下,这个悖论对信仰和医学来说都是一个深刻的问题。这篇文章最后试图理解为什么悖论的概念对我们现代西方人来说是如此难以理解,更不用说建设性地生活了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Wounds of Faith and Medicine, and the Balm of Paradox
This article is written by the parent of two babies who died in infancy from an untreatable congenital illness. The author is a Christian and the article focuses on the manner in which parental prayers for a miracle, hospital care, and church affiliation interacted in this context. While the care of church and hospital was a deep boon, nevertheless, the collision and-even more so-the collusion between the reality outlooks, epistemic assumptions, and authority structures of the church and the hospital produced what I will call the wounds of faith and the wounds of medicine. A balm does not remove a scar, nor does it restore a limb that is amputated. But a balm sees a wound for what it is and enables the sufferer to live with that wound. In this analogy, the balm refuses to provide an "answer" that dissolves either the wound of faith or the wound of medicine. An appreciation of paradox-both in the context of faith and the context of medicine-is the only balm that this author has found to be healing. Yet, the paradox is profoundly problematic to both faith and medicine in the modern Western context. This article concludes with an attempt to understand why the very idea of the paradoxical is so hard for us modern Western people to recognize, let alone live with constructively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信