在不断扩大的国际知识产权制度中调解相互作用

L. Helfer
{"title":"在不断扩大的国际知识产权制度中调解相互作用","authors":"L. Helfer","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199285822.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The last few years have been a particularly heady period for governments, private parties, and NGOs seeking to develop new rules to regulate intellectual property (\"IP\") protection standards. During that time, a slew of lawmaking initiatives, studies, and reports have been launched in a strikingly large number of international venues. Work on intellectual property rights is now underway in intergovernmental organizations such as the World Trade Organization (\"WTO\"), World Intellectual Property Organization (\"WIPO\"), and Food and Agriculture Organization (\"FAO\"); in negotiating fora such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (\"CBD\") and its Conference of the Parties and the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; and in United Nations expert and political bodies such as the Commission on Human Rights and the High Commissioner for Human Rights. In some of these venues, IP lawmaking has involved the negotiation of new international agreements. In others, IP norms are being generated through the reinterpretation of existing treaties or the creation of nonbinding guidelines, resolutions, and other forms of soft law. This essay views these myriad developments through the lens of the international relations theory of regimes. It uses the insights of regime theory to make three basic points. First, it explains why IP lawmaking has broken out of the confined institutional spaces of established international IP fora, such as WIPO and the WTO, and has moved into a broad and growing array of other international venues in environmental law, human rights, and public health. Second, it shows how this recent expansion helps to enrich regime theory itself by illustrating how regimes evolve over time and how they interact with institutions and actors in other issue areas. And third, it describes a working typology of the different modes of interaction that are developing among the many international venues in which IP lawmaking is now occurring.","PeriodicalId":80896,"journal":{"name":"Case Western Reserve journal of international law","volume":"36 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mediating Interactions in an Expanding International Intellectual Property Regime\",\"authors\":\"L. Helfer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199285822.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The last few years have been a particularly heady period for governments, private parties, and NGOs seeking to develop new rules to regulate intellectual property (\\\"IP\\\") protection standards. During that time, a slew of lawmaking initiatives, studies, and reports have been launched in a strikingly large number of international venues. Work on intellectual property rights is now underway in intergovernmental organizations such as the World Trade Organization (\\\"WTO\\\"), World Intellectual Property Organization (\\\"WIPO\\\"), and Food and Agriculture Organization (\\\"FAO\\\"); in negotiating fora such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (\\\"CBD\\\") and its Conference of the Parties and the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; and in United Nations expert and political bodies such as the Commission on Human Rights and the High Commissioner for Human Rights. In some of these venues, IP lawmaking has involved the negotiation of new international agreements. In others, IP norms are being generated through the reinterpretation of existing treaties or the creation of nonbinding guidelines, resolutions, and other forms of soft law. This essay views these myriad developments through the lens of the international relations theory of regimes. It uses the insights of regime theory to make three basic points. First, it explains why IP lawmaking has broken out of the confined institutional spaces of established international IP fora, such as WIPO and the WTO, and has moved into a broad and growing array of other international venues in environmental law, human rights, and public health. Second, it shows how this recent expansion helps to enrich regime theory itself by illustrating how regimes evolve over time and how they interact with institutions and actors in other issue areas. And third, it describes a working typology of the different modes of interaction that are developing among the many international venues in which IP lawmaking is now occurring.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Western Reserve journal of international law\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Western Reserve journal of international law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199285822.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Western Reserve journal of international law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199285822.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

对于政府、私人团体和非政府组织来说,过去几年是一个特别令人兴奋的时期,他们寻求制定新的规则来规范知识产权保护标准。在此期间,大量的立法倡议、研究和报告在大量的国际场所启动。世界贸易组织(“世贸组织”)、世界知识产权组织(“知识产权组织”)和粮食及农业组织(“粮农组织”)等政府间组织目前正在开展知识产权工作;在诸如《生物多样性公约》(“CBD”)及其缔约方大会和粮食和农业遗传资源委员会等谈判论坛中;以及人权委员会和人权事务高级专员等联合国专家和政治机构。在其中一些地方,知识产权立法涉及谈判新的国际协定。在其他国家,知识产权规范是通过重新解释现有条约或制定不具约束力的准则、决议和其他形式的软法律来制定的。这篇文章通过国际关系理论的视角来看待这些无数的发展。它利用制度理论的见解提出了三个基本观点。首先,它解释了为什么知识产权立法已经突破了既定国际知识产权论坛(如世界知识产权组织和世界贸易组织)的有限制度空间,并已进入环境法、人权和公共卫生领域广泛和不断增长的其他国际场所。其次,它通过说明制度如何随时间演变以及它们如何与其他问题领域的机构和行动者相互作用,展示了最近的扩张如何有助于丰富制度理论本身。第三,它描述了一种不同互动模式的工作类型学,这些模式正在许多正在进行知识产权立法的国际场所中发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mediating Interactions in an Expanding International Intellectual Property Regime
The last few years have been a particularly heady period for governments, private parties, and NGOs seeking to develop new rules to regulate intellectual property ("IP") protection standards. During that time, a slew of lawmaking initiatives, studies, and reports have been launched in a strikingly large number of international venues. Work on intellectual property rights is now underway in intergovernmental organizations such as the World Trade Organization ("WTO"), World Intellectual Property Organization ("WIPO"), and Food and Agriculture Organization ("FAO"); in negotiating fora such as the Convention on Biological Diversity ("CBD") and its Conference of the Parties and the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; and in United Nations expert and political bodies such as the Commission on Human Rights and the High Commissioner for Human Rights. In some of these venues, IP lawmaking has involved the negotiation of new international agreements. In others, IP norms are being generated through the reinterpretation of existing treaties or the creation of nonbinding guidelines, resolutions, and other forms of soft law. This essay views these myriad developments through the lens of the international relations theory of regimes. It uses the insights of regime theory to make three basic points. First, it explains why IP lawmaking has broken out of the confined institutional spaces of established international IP fora, such as WIPO and the WTO, and has moved into a broad and growing array of other international venues in environmental law, human rights, and public health. Second, it shows how this recent expansion helps to enrich regime theory itself by illustrating how regimes evolve over time and how they interact with institutions and actors in other issue areas. And third, it describes a working typology of the different modes of interaction that are developing among the many international venues in which IP lawmaking is now occurring.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信