{"title":"不同培养基培养的牛和猪内皮细胞自由基损伤有显著差异。","authors":"J. I. Ram, L. Hiebert","doi":"10.1089/109793301753407966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies produced models of oxygen-derived free radical (OFR) injury, using H(2)O(2) or xanthine/xanthine oxidase (X/XO), in cultured porcine aortic endothelium (PAE) and rat coronary endothelium. H(2)O(2) at 0.1 mM resulted in 50% viability in both cell types. To determine if comparable H(2)O(2) or X/XO concentrations have the same injurious effect on endothelium from other sources, models of OFR injury were developed for bovine aortic endothelium (BAE) and bovine brain microvessel endothelium (BBME). Varying concentrations of H(2)O(2) (0.01 to 6 mM) or X/XO (10 microM/0.1 to 0.3 U/mL) were added to medium 24 h prior to evaluating cell damage. Injury was assessed using the Trypan blue exclusion test (% viability) and by measuring the release of lactate dehydrogenase into medium. H(2)O(2) concentrations required to produce 50% viability were >6 mM in BAE and BBME versus 1 mM in PAE when cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM). Similarly, BAE and BBME were less sensitive than PAE to damage by X/XO. Cells from both species were more sensitive to H(2)O(2) or X/XO injury when grown in Medium 199 (M199) versus DMEM. The most profound difference was observed with PAE where 50% viability was obtained with 0.12 versus 1.05 mM H(2)O(2) in M199 versus DMEM. These results indicate that bovine endothelial cells from aorta and brain are more resistant to free radical injury than PAE. The presence or absence of key media components (iron, pyruvate, cysteine, histidine) likely influences the extent of OFR injury.","PeriodicalId":80284,"journal":{"name":"In vitro & molecular toxicology","volume":"14 3 1","pages":"209-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/109793301753407966","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marked variation in free radical injury between bovine and porcine endothelial cells cultured in different media.\",\"authors\":\"J. I. Ram, L. Hiebert\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/109793301753407966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Previous studies produced models of oxygen-derived free radical (OFR) injury, using H(2)O(2) or xanthine/xanthine oxidase (X/XO), in cultured porcine aortic endothelium (PAE) and rat coronary endothelium. H(2)O(2) at 0.1 mM resulted in 50% viability in both cell types. To determine if comparable H(2)O(2) or X/XO concentrations have the same injurious effect on endothelium from other sources, models of OFR injury were developed for bovine aortic endothelium (BAE) and bovine brain microvessel endothelium (BBME). Varying concentrations of H(2)O(2) (0.01 to 6 mM) or X/XO (10 microM/0.1 to 0.3 U/mL) were added to medium 24 h prior to evaluating cell damage. Injury was assessed using the Trypan blue exclusion test (% viability) and by measuring the release of lactate dehydrogenase into medium. H(2)O(2) concentrations required to produce 50% viability were >6 mM in BAE and BBME versus 1 mM in PAE when cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM). Similarly, BAE and BBME were less sensitive than PAE to damage by X/XO. Cells from both species were more sensitive to H(2)O(2) or X/XO injury when grown in Medium 199 (M199) versus DMEM. The most profound difference was observed with PAE where 50% viability was obtained with 0.12 versus 1.05 mM H(2)O(2) in M199 versus DMEM. These results indicate that bovine endothelial cells from aorta and brain are more resistant to free radical injury than PAE. The presence or absence of key media components (iron, pyruvate, cysteine, histidine) likely influences the extent of OFR injury.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In vitro & molecular toxicology\",\"volume\":\"14 3 1\",\"pages\":\"209-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/109793301753407966\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In vitro & molecular toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/109793301753407966\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vitro & molecular toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/109793301753407966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
先前的研究在培养的猪主动脉内皮(PAE)和大鼠冠状动脉内皮中使用H(2)O(2)或黄嘌呤/黄嘌呤氧化酶(X/XO)建立了氧源性自由基(OFR)损伤模型。0.1 mM的H(2)O(2)对两种细胞的存活率均为50%。为了确定H(2)O(2)或X/XO浓度是否对其他来源的内皮具有相同的损伤作用,我们建立了牛主动脉内皮(BAE)和牛脑微血管内皮(BBME)的OFR损伤模型。在评估细胞损伤前24小时,在培养基中加入不同浓度的H(2)O(2)(0.01至6 mM)或X/XO(10微米/0.1至0.3 U/mL)。采用台盼蓝排除试验(%存活率)和乳酸脱氢酶释放量测定来评估损伤。当细胞在Dulbecco改良Eagle培养基(DMEM)中生长时,产生50%活力所需的H(2)O(2)浓度在BAE和BBME中为0.6 mM,在PAE中为1 mM。同样,BAE和BBME对X/XO伤害的敏感性低于PAE。与DMEM相比,两种细胞在Medium 199 (M199)中生长时对H(2)O(2)或X/XO损伤更敏感。最显著的差异是PAE,在0.12和1.05 mM H(2)O(2)下,M199和DMEM的存活率分别为50%。结果表明,牛主动脉和脑内皮细胞对自由基损伤的抵抗能力强于PAE。关键介质成分(铁、丙酮酸、半胱氨酸、组氨酸)的存在或缺失可能影响OFR损伤的程度。
Marked variation in free radical injury between bovine and porcine endothelial cells cultured in different media.
Previous studies produced models of oxygen-derived free radical (OFR) injury, using H(2)O(2) or xanthine/xanthine oxidase (X/XO), in cultured porcine aortic endothelium (PAE) and rat coronary endothelium. H(2)O(2) at 0.1 mM resulted in 50% viability in both cell types. To determine if comparable H(2)O(2) or X/XO concentrations have the same injurious effect on endothelium from other sources, models of OFR injury were developed for bovine aortic endothelium (BAE) and bovine brain microvessel endothelium (BBME). Varying concentrations of H(2)O(2) (0.01 to 6 mM) or X/XO (10 microM/0.1 to 0.3 U/mL) were added to medium 24 h prior to evaluating cell damage. Injury was assessed using the Trypan blue exclusion test (% viability) and by measuring the release of lactate dehydrogenase into medium. H(2)O(2) concentrations required to produce 50% viability were >6 mM in BAE and BBME versus 1 mM in PAE when cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM). Similarly, BAE and BBME were less sensitive than PAE to damage by X/XO. Cells from both species were more sensitive to H(2)O(2) or X/XO injury when grown in Medium 199 (M199) versus DMEM. The most profound difference was observed with PAE where 50% viability was obtained with 0.12 versus 1.05 mM H(2)O(2) in M199 versus DMEM. These results indicate that bovine endothelial cells from aorta and brain are more resistant to free radical injury than PAE. The presence or absence of key media components (iron, pyruvate, cysteine, histidine) likely influences the extent of OFR injury.