重新检查在给药过程中验证患者标识符的需求:难怪容易出错

Ju-Hee Jo, J. Marquard, L. Clarke, P. Henneman
{"title":"重新检查在给药过程中验证患者标识符的需求:难怪容易出错","authors":"Ju-Hee Jo, J. Marquard, L. Clarke, P. Henneman","doi":"10.1080/19488300.2013.862329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patient identification errors are one of the major causes of medication errors. Most medication error studies to date have focused on reporting patient misidentification statistics from case studies, on classifying types of patient identification errors, or on evaluating the impact of technology on the patient identification process, but few have proposed specific strategies or guidelines to decrease patient identification errors. Our study makes three key contributions to the patient identification literature. To better understand the verification of patient identifiers (VPI) process, we first formalize the requirements for this process based on the Joint Commission's national patient safety guidelines. Second, we show the implications of these requirements by applying them to artifacts typically used in medication administration (e.g., patient's statements about their identity, patient's identification band, medication label, and medication order). Third, we evaluate whether nurses comply with these requirements when administering medications using data from clinical simulations. We found that nurses must choose from a considerable number of alternatives to fulfill the Joint Commission guidelines. Despite the number of available alternatives, a small percentage of nurses complied with the requirements for VPI, whether doing so manually or using barcode verification technology. Our findings suggest further study is needed to determine what strategies might improve compliance.","PeriodicalId":89563,"journal":{"name":"IIE transactions on healthcare systems engineering","volume":"3 1","pages":"280 - 291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19488300.2013.862329","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-examining the requirements for verification of patient identifiers during medication administration: No wonder it is error-prone\",\"authors\":\"Ju-Hee Jo, J. Marquard, L. Clarke, P. Henneman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19488300.2013.862329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patient identification errors are one of the major causes of medication errors. Most medication error studies to date have focused on reporting patient misidentification statistics from case studies, on classifying types of patient identification errors, or on evaluating the impact of technology on the patient identification process, but few have proposed specific strategies or guidelines to decrease patient identification errors. Our study makes three key contributions to the patient identification literature. To better understand the verification of patient identifiers (VPI) process, we first formalize the requirements for this process based on the Joint Commission's national patient safety guidelines. Second, we show the implications of these requirements by applying them to artifacts typically used in medication administration (e.g., patient's statements about their identity, patient's identification band, medication label, and medication order). Third, we evaluate whether nurses comply with these requirements when administering medications using data from clinical simulations. We found that nurses must choose from a considerable number of alternatives to fulfill the Joint Commission guidelines. Despite the number of available alternatives, a small percentage of nurses complied with the requirements for VPI, whether doing so manually or using barcode verification technology. Our findings suggest further study is needed to determine what strategies might improve compliance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IIE transactions on healthcare systems engineering\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"280 - 291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19488300.2013.862329\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IIE transactions on healthcare systems engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19488300.2013.862329\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIE transactions on healthcare systems engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19488300.2013.862329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

患者识别错误是导致用药错误的主要原因之一。迄今为止,大多数药物错误研究都侧重于报告病例研究中的患者错误识别统计数据,对患者识别错误的类型进行分类,或评估技术对患者识别过程的影响,但很少有人提出具体的策略或指南来减少患者识别错误。我们的研究为患者识别文献做出了三个关键贡献。为了更好地理解患者标识符(VPI)流程的验证,我们首先根据联合委员会的国家患者安全指南形式化了该流程的要求。其次,我们通过将这些需求应用于药物管理中通常使用的工件(例如,患者关于其身份的陈述、患者的标识带、药物标签和药物订单)来显示这些需求的含义。第三,我们使用临床模拟数据评估护士在给药时是否遵守这些要求。我们发现护士必须从相当多的替代方案中进行选择,以满足联合委员会的指导方针。尽管有许多可用的替代方案,但一小部分护士遵守了VPI的要求,无论是手动还是使用条形码验证技术。我们的研究结果表明,需要进一步的研究来确定哪些策略可以提高依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-examining the requirements for verification of patient identifiers during medication administration: No wonder it is error-prone
Patient identification errors are one of the major causes of medication errors. Most medication error studies to date have focused on reporting patient misidentification statistics from case studies, on classifying types of patient identification errors, or on evaluating the impact of technology on the patient identification process, but few have proposed specific strategies or guidelines to decrease patient identification errors. Our study makes three key contributions to the patient identification literature. To better understand the verification of patient identifiers (VPI) process, we first formalize the requirements for this process based on the Joint Commission's national patient safety guidelines. Second, we show the implications of these requirements by applying them to artifacts typically used in medication administration (e.g., patient's statements about their identity, patient's identification band, medication label, and medication order). Third, we evaluate whether nurses comply with these requirements when administering medications using data from clinical simulations. We found that nurses must choose from a considerable number of alternatives to fulfill the Joint Commission guidelines. Despite the number of available alternatives, a small percentage of nurses complied with the requirements for VPI, whether doing so manually or using barcode verification technology. Our findings suggest further study is needed to determine what strategies might improve compliance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信