急诊科病人流程设计

Y. Marmor, B. Golany, S. Israelit, A. Mandelbaum
{"title":"急诊科病人流程设计","authors":"Y. Marmor, B. Golany, S. Israelit, A. Mandelbaum","doi":"10.1080/19488300.2012.736118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emergency Department (ED) managers can choose from several operational models, for example, Triage or Fast-Track. The following questions thus naturally arise: why does a hospital choose to work with its particular operational model rather than another? Or what is the best model to operate under? More specifically, how to fit an operational model to an ED's uncontrollable (environmental) parameters? To address such questions, we develop a methodology for ED Design (EDD): we apply it to data collected over a period of two to four years from eight hospitals, of various sizes and deploying various ED operational models. (To cover all size-model combinations, we enrich our data via accurate ED simulation.) The EDD methodology first feeds the data into a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) program, which determines the relative efficiency of each month of the different operational models of each hospital. Then, after taking into account the individual hospitals effect, we identify the operational model that is dominant under each set of uncontrollable parameters. We discovered that different operational models dominate others over different combinations of uncontrollable parameters. For example, a hospital catering to an aging population is best served by a fast-track operational model.","PeriodicalId":89563,"journal":{"name":"IIE transactions on healthcare systems engineering","volume":"2 1","pages":"233 - 247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19488300.2012.736118","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing patient flow in emergency departments\",\"authors\":\"Y. Marmor, B. Golany, S. Israelit, A. Mandelbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19488300.2012.736118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Emergency Department (ED) managers can choose from several operational models, for example, Triage or Fast-Track. The following questions thus naturally arise: why does a hospital choose to work with its particular operational model rather than another? Or what is the best model to operate under? More specifically, how to fit an operational model to an ED's uncontrollable (environmental) parameters? To address such questions, we develop a methodology for ED Design (EDD): we apply it to data collected over a period of two to four years from eight hospitals, of various sizes and deploying various ED operational models. (To cover all size-model combinations, we enrich our data via accurate ED simulation.) The EDD methodology first feeds the data into a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) program, which determines the relative efficiency of each month of the different operational models of each hospital. Then, after taking into account the individual hospitals effect, we identify the operational model that is dominant under each set of uncontrollable parameters. We discovered that different operational models dominate others over different combinations of uncontrollable parameters. For example, a hospital catering to an aging population is best served by a fast-track operational model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IIE transactions on healthcare systems engineering\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"233 - 247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19488300.2012.736118\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IIE transactions on healthcare systems engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19488300.2012.736118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIE transactions on healthcare systems engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19488300.2012.736118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

急诊科(ED)管理人员可以从几种运营模式中进行选择,例如分流(Triage)或快速通道(Fast-Track)。因此,以下问题自然产生了:为什么一家医院选择采用自己的运营模式,而不是另一种模式?或者说什么是最好的经营模式?更具体地说,如何使操作模型适应ED的不可控(环境)参数?为了解决这些问题,我们开发了一种ED设计(EDD)方法:我们将其应用于从八家不同规模的医院收集的数据,这些医院采用了不同的ED运营模式。(为了涵盖所有尺寸模型组合,我们通过精确的ED模拟来丰富我们的数据。)EDD方法首先将数据输入数据包络分析(DEA)程序,该程序确定每家医院不同运营模式每个月的相对效率。然后,在考虑了个别医院的影响后,我们确定了在每组不可控参数下占主导地位的运营模式。我们发现不同的操作模型在不可控参数的不同组合上支配其他模型。例如,一家面向老龄化人口的医院最好采用快速通道运营模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing patient flow in emergency departments
Emergency Department (ED) managers can choose from several operational models, for example, Triage or Fast-Track. The following questions thus naturally arise: why does a hospital choose to work with its particular operational model rather than another? Or what is the best model to operate under? More specifically, how to fit an operational model to an ED's uncontrollable (environmental) parameters? To address such questions, we develop a methodology for ED Design (EDD): we apply it to data collected over a period of two to four years from eight hospitals, of various sizes and deploying various ED operational models. (To cover all size-model combinations, we enrich our data via accurate ED simulation.) The EDD methodology first feeds the data into a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) program, which determines the relative efficiency of each month of the different operational models of each hospital. Then, after taking into account the individual hospitals effect, we identify the operational model that is dominant under each set of uncontrollable parameters. We discovered that different operational models dominate others over different combinations of uncontrollable parameters. For example, a hospital catering to an aging population is best served by a fast-track operational model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信