从小组工作到团队合作:医疗信息技术部“精益”快速流程改进的案例研究

R. Holden, Greg Hackbart
{"title":"从小组工作到团队合作:医疗信息技术部“精益”快速流程改进的案例研究","authors":"R. Holden, Greg Hackbart","doi":"10.1080/19488300.2012.709584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a mixed-methods case study of process improvement at the information technology (IT) Department of ThedaCare, a Northeast Wisconsin community health system. As part of its broader goal to improve care, ThedaCare launched a “Lean” improvement project directed at IT support or “fix work” services. IT Department staff, IT support service customers, and a Lean facilitator participated in a weeklong rapid improvement event. Participants identified opportunities for process improvement, collected baseline measures on how (and how well) the IT Department was providing support services, and jointly developed a preliminary solution centered on a new team-based organization of support services. Rather than forwarding service requests to groups of support staff organized by IT application type, service requests would now be resolved on-the-spot by a team with distributed knowledge of multiple applications. Six and twelve months post-intervention, there was some evidence of success, including performance improvement and staff buy-in. We use realistic evaluation as an organizing framework to describe potential links between the intervention content and process, the surrounding context, and the outcomes of the intervention. We hypothesize four mechanisms that mediate this link: work standardization; connections between people; seamless flow; and participatory problem solving. We conclude that other organizations can learn as much from ThedaCare's participatory rapid improvement process and Lean approach to transformational change as from the actual implemented changes. Supplemental materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of IIE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering to view the free supplemental file.","PeriodicalId":89563,"journal":{"name":"IIE transactions on healthcare systems engineering","volume":"2 1","pages":"190 - 201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19488300.2012.709584","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From group work to teamwork: A case study of “Lean” rapid process improvement in the ThedaCare Information Technology Department\",\"authors\":\"R. Holden, Greg Hackbart\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19488300.2012.709584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a mixed-methods case study of process improvement at the information technology (IT) Department of ThedaCare, a Northeast Wisconsin community health system. As part of its broader goal to improve care, ThedaCare launched a “Lean” improvement project directed at IT support or “fix work” services. IT Department staff, IT support service customers, and a Lean facilitator participated in a weeklong rapid improvement event. Participants identified opportunities for process improvement, collected baseline measures on how (and how well) the IT Department was providing support services, and jointly developed a preliminary solution centered on a new team-based organization of support services. Rather than forwarding service requests to groups of support staff organized by IT application type, service requests would now be resolved on-the-spot by a team with distributed knowledge of multiple applications. Six and twelve months post-intervention, there was some evidence of success, including performance improvement and staff buy-in. We use realistic evaluation as an organizing framework to describe potential links between the intervention content and process, the surrounding context, and the outcomes of the intervention. We hypothesize four mechanisms that mediate this link: work standardization; connections between people; seamless flow; and participatory problem solving. We conclude that other organizations can learn as much from ThedaCare's participatory rapid improvement process and Lean approach to transformational change as from the actual implemented changes. Supplemental materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of IIE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering to view the free supplemental file.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IIE transactions on healthcare systems engineering\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"190 - 201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19488300.2012.709584\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IIE transactions on healthcare systems engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19488300.2012.709584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIE transactions on healthcare systems engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19488300.2012.709584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

本文提出了一个混合方法的案例研究过程改进的信息技术(IT)部门的dacare,东北威斯康辛州的社区卫生系统。作为改善医疗服务这一更广泛目标的一部分,ThedaCare启动了一项针对IT支持或“修复工作”服务的“精益”改进项目。IT部门员工、IT支持服务客户和一名精益推动者参加了为期一周的快速改进活动。参与者确定了过程改进的机会,收集了关于IT部门如何(以及如何好地)提供支持服务的基线度量,并联合开发了一个以支持服务的新团队为中心的初步解决方案。现在,服务请求将由具有多个应用程序的分布式知识的团队在现场解决,而不是将服务请求转发给按IT应用程序类型组织的支持人员组。干预6个月和12个月后,有一些成功的证据,包括业绩改善和工作人员的支持。我们使用现实评估作为组织框架来描述干预内容和过程、周围环境和干预结果之间的潜在联系。我们假设有四种机制可以调节这种联系:工作标准化;人与人之间的联系;无缝流动;参与式解决问题。我们的结论是,其他组织可以从ThedaCare的参与式快速改进过程和精益方法中学到与实际实施的变化一样多的转型变化。本文有补充材料。去出版商的在线版IIE医疗系统工程交易查看免费的补充文件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From group work to teamwork: A case study of “Lean” rapid process improvement in the ThedaCare Information Technology Department
This paper presents a mixed-methods case study of process improvement at the information technology (IT) Department of ThedaCare, a Northeast Wisconsin community health system. As part of its broader goal to improve care, ThedaCare launched a “Lean” improvement project directed at IT support or “fix work” services. IT Department staff, IT support service customers, and a Lean facilitator participated in a weeklong rapid improvement event. Participants identified opportunities for process improvement, collected baseline measures on how (and how well) the IT Department was providing support services, and jointly developed a preliminary solution centered on a new team-based organization of support services. Rather than forwarding service requests to groups of support staff organized by IT application type, service requests would now be resolved on-the-spot by a team with distributed knowledge of multiple applications. Six and twelve months post-intervention, there was some evidence of success, including performance improvement and staff buy-in. We use realistic evaluation as an organizing framework to describe potential links between the intervention content and process, the surrounding context, and the outcomes of the intervention. We hypothesize four mechanisms that mediate this link: work standardization; connections between people; seamless flow; and participatory problem solving. We conclude that other organizations can learn as much from ThedaCare's participatory rapid improvement process and Lean approach to transformational change as from the actual implemented changes. Supplemental materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of IIE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering to view the free supplemental file.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信