{"title":"“群岛文化”在印尼是一种排他性的政府话语","authors":"Greg Acciaoli","doi":"10.1080/14442210110001706015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The multiplicity of nation-views and the idea that political identity is not fixed but shifts between different loci introduces the idea that nationalism is best seen as a relational identity. In other words, the nation, even where it is manifestly not a recent invention, is hardly the realization of an original essence, but a historical configuration designed to include certain groups and exclude or marginalize others—often violently (Duara 1995:15).","PeriodicalId":45108,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology","volume":"2 1","pages":"1 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2001-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14442210110001706015","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Archipelagic culture’ as an exclusionary government discourse in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Greg Acciaoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14442210110001706015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The multiplicity of nation-views and the idea that political identity is not fixed but shifts between different loci introduces the idea that nationalism is best seen as a relational identity. In other words, the nation, even where it is manifestly not a recent invention, is hardly the realization of an original essence, but a historical configuration designed to include certain groups and exclude or marginalize others—often violently (Duara 1995:15).\",\"PeriodicalId\":45108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14442210110001706015\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14442210110001706015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14442210110001706015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
‘Archipelagic culture’ as an exclusionary government discourse in Indonesia
The multiplicity of nation-views and the idea that political identity is not fixed but shifts between different loci introduces the idea that nationalism is best seen as a relational identity. In other words, the nation, even where it is manifestly not a recent invention, is hardly the realization of an original essence, but a historical configuration designed to include certain groups and exclude or marginalize others—often violently (Duara 1995:15).