{"title":"残疾倡导的成本:调整残疾儿童的自给标准","authors":"A. C. Sousa","doi":"10.1080/10796126.2015.1109500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article proposes a theoretical model for adapting, for families of children with disabilities, Brooks and Pearce's Self-Sufficiency Standard [(2000). “Meeting Needs, Measuring Outcomes: The Self-Sufficiency Standard as a Tool for Policy-Making, Evaluation, and Client Counseling.” The Clearinghouse Review 34 (2000–2001): 34]. With regard to such families, three additional components are considered: increased out-of-pocket expenditures, lost wages for caregiving, and cost of advocacy. Like the Self-Sufficiency Standard itself, this adaptation does not propose an extravagant or even comfortable lifestyle. Instead, this model extends Brooks and Pearce's advocacy agenda by estimating the relative costs of obtaining basic necessities and supports for families raising children with disabilities and by providing clear direction for community engagement in family economic policy.","PeriodicalId":35244,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Children and Poverty","volume":"22 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10796126.2015.1109500","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The cost of disability advocacy: adjusting the self-sufficiency standard for children with disabilities\",\"authors\":\"A. C. Sousa\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10796126.2015.1109500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article proposes a theoretical model for adapting, for families of children with disabilities, Brooks and Pearce's Self-Sufficiency Standard [(2000). “Meeting Needs, Measuring Outcomes: The Self-Sufficiency Standard as a Tool for Policy-Making, Evaluation, and Client Counseling.” The Clearinghouse Review 34 (2000–2001): 34]. With regard to such families, three additional components are considered: increased out-of-pocket expenditures, lost wages for caregiving, and cost of advocacy. Like the Self-Sufficiency Standard itself, this adaptation does not propose an extravagant or even comfortable lifestyle. Instead, this model extends Brooks and Pearce's advocacy agenda by estimating the relative costs of obtaining basic necessities and supports for families raising children with disabilities and by providing clear direction for community engagement in family economic policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Children and Poverty\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10796126.2015.1109500\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Children and Poverty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10796126.2015.1109500\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Children and Poverty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10796126.2015.1109500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
The cost of disability advocacy: adjusting the self-sufficiency standard for children with disabilities
ABSTRACT This article proposes a theoretical model for adapting, for families of children with disabilities, Brooks and Pearce's Self-Sufficiency Standard [(2000). “Meeting Needs, Measuring Outcomes: The Self-Sufficiency Standard as a Tool for Policy-Making, Evaluation, and Client Counseling.” The Clearinghouse Review 34 (2000–2001): 34]. With regard to such families, three additional components are considered: increased out-of-pocket expenditures, lost wages for caregiving, and cost of advocacy. Like the Self-Sufficiency Standard itself, this adaptation does not propose an extravagant or even comfortable lifestyle. Instead, this model extends Brooks and Pearce's advocacy agenda by estimating the relative costs of obtaining basic necessities and supports for families raising children with disabilities and by providing clear direction for community engagement in family economic policy.