转向他者:西尔万·乔治纪录片中人类的面孔、事物的面孔和语言的面孔

Jiewon Baek
{"title":"转向他者:西尔万·乔治纪录片中人类的面孔、事物的面孔和语言的面孔","authors":"Jiewon Baek","doi":"10.1080/14715880.2016.1138719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In Sylvain George’s documentaries on migrants in Calais, aesthetics, ethics and politics figure together in such a way that revises the understanding of ethics currently held within scholarship on Emmanuel Levinas and documentary cinema. George’s films – L’Impossible (2009) and Qu’ils reposent en révolte (2010) are examined here in particular – move documentary ethics away from moral concerns of how not to offend the alterity of the filmed subject, to the very modes of visuality vis-à-vis the faces of others. The montage of faces in George’s films and the equivocal place of faces in Levinas’s ethics suggest how the immediate expression of the face comes into play through the very forms of mediation and representation, such as metaphors, language and technique. These are the forms through which the cinematic alters visual-sensible dispositions toward others, which is an ethics. The particularity of documentary ethics, then, transpires not as pre-given but only insofar as cinema’s alteration of sense results in moments in which the aesthetic-political work takes the form of documentary.","PeriodicalId":51945,"journal":{"name":"Studies in French Cinema","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14715880.2016.1138719","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Turning toward the Other: the face of humans, the face of things and the face of language in the documentaries of Sylvain George\",\"authors\":\"Jiewon Baek\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14715880.2016.1138719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In Sylvain George’s documentaries on migrants in Calais, aesthetics, ethics and politics figure together in such a way that revises the understanding of ethics currently held within scholarship on Emmanuel Levinas and documentary cinema. George’s films – L’Impossible (2009) and Qu’ils reposent en révolte (2010) are examined here in particular – move documentary ethics away from moral concerns of how not to offend the alterity of the filmed subject, to the very modes of visuality vis-à-vis the faces of others. The montage of faces in George’s films and the equivocal place of faces in Levinas’s ethics suggest how the immediate expression of the face comes into play through the very forms of mediation and representation, such as metaphors, language and technique. These are the forms through which the cinematic alters visual-sensible dispositions toward others, which is an ethics. The particularity of documentary ethics, then, transpires not as pre-given but only insofar as cinema’s alteration of sense results in moments in which the aesthetic-political work takes the form of documentary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in French Cinema\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14715880.2016.1138719\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in French Cinema\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14715880.2016.1138719\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in French Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14715880.2016.1138719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在西尔万·乔治关于加莱移民的纪录片中,美学、伦理和政治以这样一种方式一起出现,修正了目前在伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯和纪录片电影学术界对伦理学的理解。乔治的电影——《不可能》(2009年)和《屈伊斯的重生》(2010年)在这里被特别审视——将纪录片伦理从如何不冒犯拍摄对象的另类性的道德关注转移到-à-vis他人面孔的视觉模式上。乔治电影中面部的蒙太奇和列维纳斯伦理学中面部的模棱两可的地位表明,面部的直接表达是如何通过隐喻、语言和技术等调解和再现的形式发挥作用的。通过这些形式,电影改变了对他人的视觉感知倾向,这是一种伦理。因此,纪录片伦理的特殊性并不是预先给定的,而是只有在电影对感觉的改变导致美学政治作品采取纪录片形式的时刻才会出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Turning toward the Other: the face of humans, the face of things and the face of language in the documentaries of Sylvain George
Abstract In Sylvain George’s documentaries on migrants in Calais, aesthetics, ethics and politics figure together in such a way that revises the understanding of ethics currently held within scholarship on Emmanuel Levinas and documentary cinema. George’s films – L’Impossible (2009) and Qu’ils reposent en révolte (2010) are examined here in particular – move documentary ethics away from moral concerns of how not to offend the alterity of the filmed subject, to the very modes of visuality vis-à-vis the faces of others. The montage of faces in George’s films and the equivocal place of faces in Levinas’s ethics suggest how the immediate expression of the face comes into play through the very forms of mediation and representation, such as metaphors, language and technique. These are the forms through which the cinematic alters visual-sensible dispositions toward others, which is an ethics. The particularity of documentary ethics, then, transpires not as pre-given but only insofar as cinema’s alteration of sense results in moments in which the aesthetic-political work takes the form of documentary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in French Cinema
Studies in French Cinema FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信