漫画讽刺与漫长的十九世纪的英国

Q2 Arts and Humanities
F. Cullen, Richard A. Gaunt
{"title":"漫画讽刺与漫长的十九世纪的英国","authors":"F. Cullen, Richard A. Gaunt","doi":"10.1080/14714787.2019.1615379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue of Visual Culture in Britain contains five articles that examine the role of the transnational in the production of political satires. The articles range from early-nineteenth-century America to Ireland, Germany and Australia. Within the last generation, scholars have begun to take graphic art more seriously than ever before. Building on a proud tradition of scholarship dating from the work of Ernst Gombrich, and using the vast corpus of material assembled in the British Museum’s catalogue of personal and political satires by Frederic Stephens and Dorothy George, scholars such as Diana Donald, Ronald Patten, Eirwen Nicholson, Amelia Rauser, Mark Hallett and Todd Porterfield have begun to interrogate, more seriously, the visual language of this genre in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Brian Maidment has extended this work, contributing important commentaries on reading comic images as well as popular prints, a contribution to scholarship which he continued most memorably in his plenary talk to the symposium that heralded this special issue of Visual Culture in Britain. Nonetheless, in spite of this formidable array of scholarship, there is still a perception that graphic art is not taken as seriously as other visual art productions, such as painting, drawing, film and sculpture. Why graphic art does not enjoy a more significant role in the academic canon is one motivation behind this special issue of Visual Culture in Britain. Another is the paucity of literature on transnational aspects of the British graphic tradition. British graphic art did not exist in a vacuum – it was influenced by developments in, and practitioners from, a wide range of contexts. This collection of articles, which derives from the one-day symposium on graphic satire and the United Kingdom in the long nineteenth century, held at the University of Nottingham in September 2017, seeks to interrogate the nature of the United Kingdom’s status as a global power in the long nineteenth century by considering the varied ways in which it was viewed, and represented, in graphic satire during the period. The five articles that follow discuss how graphic satire illuminated the relationship not only between Britain and other imperial colonies, such as Ireland and Australia, but also with powers such as the USA and Germany. A running connection between them is the sustained transnational influence of the British graphic satirical tradition throughout the nineteenth century. That influence is examined for good or ill in a number of case studies that consider such issues as the reception of imagery, the widening","PeriodicalId":35078,"journal":{"name":"Visual Culture in Britain","volume":"20 1","pages":"104 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14714787.2019.1615379","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Graphic Satire and the UK in the Long Nineteenth Century\",\"authors\":\"F. Cullen, Richard A. Gaunt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14714787.2019.1615379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This special issue of Visual Culture in Britain contains five articles that examine the role of the transnational in the production of political satires. The articles range from early-nineteenth-century America to Ireland, Germany and Australia. Within the last generation, scholars have begun to take graphic art more seriously than ever before. Building on a proud tradition of scholarship dating from the work of Ernst Gombrich, and using the vast corpus of material assembled in the British Museum’s catalogue of personal and political satires by Frederic Stephens and Dorothy George, scholars such as Diana Donald, Ronald Patten, Eirwen Nicholson, Amelia Rauser, Mark Hallett and Todd Porterfield have begun to interrogate, more seriously, the visual language of this genre in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Brian Maidment has extended this work, contributing important commentaries on reading comic images as well as popular prints, a contribution to scholarship which he continued most memorably in his plenary talk to the symposium that heralded this special issue of Visual Culture in Britain. Nonetheless, in spite of this formidable array of scholarship, there is still a perception that graphic art is not taken as seriously as other visual art productions, such as painting, drawing, film and sculpture. Why graphic art does not enjoy a more significant role in the academic canon is one motivation behind this special issue of Visual Culture in Britain. Another is the paucity of literature on transnational aspects of the British graphic tradition. British graphic art did not exist in a vacuum – it was influenced by developments in, and practitioners from, a wide range of contexts. This collection of articles, which derives from the one-day symposium on graphic satire and the United Kingdom in the long nineteenth century, held at the University of Nottingham in September 2017, seeks to interrogate the nature of the United Kingdom’s status as a global power in the long nineteenth century by considering the varied ways in which it was viewed, and represented, in graphic satire during the period. The five articles that follow discuss how graphic satire illuminated the relationship not only between Britain and other imperial colonies, such as Ireland and Australia, but also with powers such as the USA and Germany. A running connection between them is the sustained transnational influence of the British graphic satirical tradition throughout the nineteenth century. That influence is examined for good or ill in a number of case studies that consider such issues as the reception of imagery, the widening\",\"PeriodicalId\":35078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visual Culture in Britain\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"104 - 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14714787.2019.1615379\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visual Culture in Britain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14714787.2019.1615379\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual Culture in Britain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14714787.2019.1615379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本期《英国视觉文化》特刊包含五篇文章,探讨了跨国公司在政治讽刺作品制作中的作用。这些文章的范围从19世纪早期的美国到爱尔兰、德国和澳大利亚。在过去的一代人中,学者们开始比以往任何时候都更认真地对待图形艺术。基于恩斯特·贡布里希(Ernst Gombrich)的作品所带来的令人自豪的学术传统,并利用大英博物馆弗雷德里克·斯蒂芬斯(Frederic Stephens)和多萝西·乔治(Dorothy George)的个人和政治讽刺作品目录中收集的大量材料,戴安娜·唐纳德(Diana Donald)、罗纳德·彭定康(Ronald Patten)、埃尔文·尼科尔森(Eirwen Nicholson)、阿米莉亚·劳瑟(Amelia Rauser)、马克·哈雷特(Mark Hallett)和托德·波特菲尔德(Todd Porterfield)等学者开始更严肃地审视18世纪和19世纪这种类型的视觉语言。布莱恩·梅德门特扩展了这项工作,对阅读漫画图像和流行印刷品做出了重要的评论,这是对学术的贡献,他在研讨会的全体会议上继续了最令人难忘的贡献,预示了英国视觉文化的特别问题。然而,尽管有这些令人敬畏的学术成果,仍然有一种看法认为,图形艺术没有像其他视觉艺术作品(如绘画、绘画、电影和雕塑)那样被认真对待。为什么图形艺术没有在学术经典中享有更重要的地位,这是本期英国《视觉文化》特刊背后的动机之一。另一个原因是缺乏关于英国图形传统跨国方面的文献。英国图形艺术并不是存在于真空中——它受到了广泛背景下的发展和从业者的影响。这一系列的文章,这源于为期一天的研讨会上的图形讽刺和英国在漫长的十九世纪,在2017年9月在诺丁汉大学举行,试图通过考虑不同的方式来审视英国的地位的性质作为一个全球大国在漫长的十九世纪,在图形讽刺期间,它被视为和代表。接下来的五篇文章讨论了生动的讽刺如何阐明了英国与其他帝国殖民地(如爱尔兰和澳大利亚)之间的关系,以及与美国和德国等大国之间的关系。他们之间的联系是整个19世纪英国讽刺漫画传统持续的跨国影响。在一些案例研究中,对这种影响的好坏进行了研究,这些研究考虑了诸如图像的接收,扩大等问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Graphic Satire and the UK in the Long Nineteenth Century
This special issue of Visual Culture in Britain contains five articles that examine the role of the transnational in the production of political satires. The articles range from early-nineteenth-century America to Ireland, Germany and Australia. Within the last generation, scholars have begun to take graphic art more seriously than ever before. Building on a proud tradition of scholarship dating from the work of Ernst Gombrich, and using the vast corpus of material assembled in the British Museum’s catalogue of personal and political satires by Frederic Stephens and Dorothy George, scholars such as Diana Donald, Ronald Patten, Eirwen Nicholson, Amelia Rauser, Mark Hallett and Todd Porterfield have begun to interrogate, more seriously, the visual language of this genre in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Brian Maidment has extended this work, contributing important commentaries on reading comic images as well as popular prints, a contribution to scholarship which he continued most memorably in his plenary talk to the symposium that heralded this special issue of Visual Culture in Britain. Nonetheless, in spite of this formidable array of scholarship, there is still a perception that graphic art is not taken as seriously as other visual art productions, such as painting, drawing, film and sculpture. Why graphic art does not enjoy a more significant role in the academic canon is one motivation behind this special issue of Visual Culture in Britain. Another is the paucity of literature on transnational aspects of the British graphic tradition. British graphic art did not exist in a vacuum – it was influenced by developments in, and practitioners from, a wide range of contexts. This collection of articles, which derives from the one-day symposium on graphic satire and the United Kingdom in the long nineteenth century, held at the University of Nottingham in September 2017, seeks to interrogate the nature of the United Kingdom’s status as a global power in the long nineteenth century by considering the varied ways in which it was viewed, and represented, in graphic satire during the period. The five articles that follow discuss how graphic satire illuminated the relationship not only between Britain and other imperial colonies, such as Ireland and Australia, but also with powers such as the USA and Germany. A running connection between them is the sustained transnational influence of the British graphic satirical tradition throughout the nineteenth century. That influence is examined for good or ill in a number of case studies that consider such issues as the reception of imagery, the widening
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Visual Culture in Britain
Visual Culture in Britain Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信