板栗的表型整合:叶片与果实

Botanical Gazette Pub Date : 1991-12-01 DOI:10.1086/337914
M. Pigliucci, C. Paoletti, S. Fineschi, M. Malvolti
{"title":"板栗的表型整合:叶片与果实","authors":"M. Pigliucci, C. Paoletti, S. Fineschi, M. Malvolti","doi":"10.1086/337914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is increasing attention in the literature to a more complex view of the phenotype in natural populations. Modern morphometric studies rely on more than single traits, and the classical approaches of size and shape analysis are being coupled with studies on amounts and patterns of phenotypic covariances and correlations, i.e., morphological integration. In this study, we describe the morphometrical differentiation of eight populations of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.), focusing on phenotypic integration of two anatomical structures: leaves and fruits. Our results show that (1) the amount of integration (i.e., the overall strength of trait correlations) is higher for fruit than for leaf characters; (2) the patterns of integration (i.e., the direction of trait correlations) are more variable for fruits than for leaves; and (3) the two anatomical structures are completely unrelated to each other in both amounts and patterns of phenotypic integration. These results are discussed in relation to how artificial selection could have acted on the underlying genetic mechanisms of these different aspects of chestnut phenotype.","PeriodicalId":9213,"journal":{"name":"Botanical Gazette","volume":"152 1","pages":"514 - 521"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/337914","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phenotypic Integration in Chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.): Leaves versus Fruits\",\"authors\":\"M. Pigliucci, C. Paoletti, S. Fineschi, M. Malvolti\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/337914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is increasing attention in the literature to a more complex view of the phenotype in natural populations. Modern morphometric studies rely on more than single traits, and the classical approaches of size and shape analysis are being coupled with studies on amounts and patterns of phenotypic covariances and correlations, i.e., morphological integration. In this study, we describe the morphometrical differentiation of eight populations of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.), focusing on phenotypic integration of two anatomical structures: leaves and fruits. Our results show that (1) the amount of integration (i.e., the overall strength of trait correlations) is higher for fruit than for leaf characters; (2) the patterns of integration (i.e., the direction of trait correlations) are more variable for fruits than for leaves; and (3) the two anatomical structures are completely unrelated to each other in both amounts and patterns of phenotypic integration. These results are discussed in relation to how artificial selection could have acted on the underlying genetic mechanisms of these different aspects of chestnut phenotype.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Botanical Gazette\",\"volume\":\"152 1\",\"pages\":\"514 - 521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/337914\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Botanical Gazette\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/337914\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Botanical Gazette","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/337914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

在文献中有越来越多的关注到自然种群表型的更复杂的观点。现代形态计量学研究依赖于不止单一的性状,传统的大小和形状分析方法正在与表型协方差和相关性的数量和模式的研究相结合,即形态整合。在本研究中,我们描述了板栗(Castanea sativa Mill.) 8个居群的形态分化,重点关注叶和果实两种解剖结构的表型整合。结果表明:(1)果实性状的整合量(即性状相关的总体强度)高于叶片性状;(2)果实的整合模式(即性状相关方向)比叶片的变化更大;(3)两种解剖结构在表型整合的数量和模式上完全无关。这些结果讨论了人工选择如何作用于板栗表型这些不同方面的潜在遗传机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phenotypic Integration in Chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.): Leaves versus Fruits
There is increasing attention in the literature to a more complex view of the phenotype in natural populations. Modern morphometric studies rely on more than single traits, and the classical approaches of size and shape analysis are being coupled with studies on amounts and patterns of phenotypic covariances and correlations, i.e., morphological integration. In this study, we describe the morphometrical differentiation of eight populations of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.), focusing on phenotypic integration of two anatomical structures: leaves and fruits. Our results show that (1) the amount of integration (i.e., the overall strength of trait correlations) is higher for fruit than for leaf characters; (2) the patterns of integration (i.e., the direction of trait correlations) are more variable for fruits than for leaves; and (3) the two anatomical structures are completely unrelated to each other in both amounts and patterns of phenotypic integration. These results are discussed in relation to how artificial selection could have acted on the underlying genetic mechanisms of these different aspects of chestnut phenotype.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信