恋爱中的不忠

R. McAnulty, Jocelyn M. Brineman
{"title":"恋爱中的不忠","authors":"R. McAnulty, Jocelyn M. Brineman","doi":"10.1080/10532528.2007.10559848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Even though research on dating infidelity has been conducted for years, it still contends with limitations, including over reliance on heterosexual college student samples and a lack of longitudinal research on patterns and long-term effects of infidelity. Still, the limited research reveals that college students use very broad criteria for defining dating infidelity. Effectively, almost any form of emotional or sexual intimacy with a person other than one's primary dating partner qualifies as infidelity. Relying on such broad criteria, the studies reveal that many, if not most, students have engaged in some form of infidelity. Extradyadic involvements generally involve flirtation and passionate kissing, which culminate in sexual intercourse for nearly half of male students and one third of female students. The majority of students disapprove of infidelity in virtually all circumstances, although it may be more excusable if it occurs because the primary relationship is troubled or because of an irresistible attraction to another person. Reactions to a partner's infidelity are almost invariably negative, often involving termination of the relationship. Motives for infidelity are varied, but they are usually tied to concerns or problems in the primary relationship. Degree of commitment to one's primary relationship is a significant predictor of risk for infidelity. Sexually permissive attitudes and attachment styles that involve anxiety over abandonment may predict likelihood of engaging in dating infidelity. Additionally, individual differences, such as low “conscientiousness,” may play a role.","PeriodicalId":79558,"journal":{"name":"Annual review of sex research","volume":"18 1","pages":"114 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10532528.2007.10559848","citationCount":"63","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infidelity in Dating Relationships\",\"authors\":\"R. McAnulty, Jocelyn M. Brineman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10532528.2007.10559848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Even though research on dating infidelity has been conducted for years, it still contends with limitations, including over reliance on heterosexual college student samples and a lack of longitudinal research on patterns and long-term effects of infidelity. Still, the limited research reveals that college students use very broad criteria for defining dating infidelity. Effectively, almost any form of emotional or sexual intimacy with a person other than one's primary dating partner qualifies as infidelity. Relying on such broad criteria, the studies reveal that many, if not most, students have engaged in some form of infidelity. Extradyadic involvements generally involve flirtation and passionate kissing, which culminate in sexual intercourse for nearly half of male students and one third of female students. The majority of students disapprove of infidelity in virtually all circumstances, although it may be more excusable if it occurs because the primary relationship is troubled or because of an irresistible attraction to another person. Reactions to a partner's infidelity are almost invariably negative, often involving termination of the relationship. Motives for infidelity are varied, but they are usually tied to concerns or problems in the primary relationship. Degree of commitment to one's primary relationship is a significant predictor of risk for infidelity. Sexually permissive attitudes and attachment styles that involve anxiety over abandonment may predict likelihood of engaging in dating infidelity. Additionally, individual differences, such as low “conscientiousness,” may play a role.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual review of sex research\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"114 - 94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10532528.2007.10559848\",\"citationCount\":\"63\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual review of sex research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10532528.2007.10559848\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual review of sex research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10532528.2007.10559848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

摘要

尽管对约会不忠的研究已经进行了多年,但它仍然存在局限性,包括过度依赖异性恋大学生样本,以及缺乏对不忠模式和长期影响的纵向研究。尽管如此,有限的研究表明,大学生对约会不忠的定义标准非常宽泛。实际上,与主要约会对象以外的人发生的几乎任何形式的情感或性亲密行为都属于不忠。基于如此宽泛的标准,研究表明,即使不是大多数,也有许多学生有过某种形式的不忠行为。外部交往通常包括调情和热吻,近一半的男学生和三分之一的女学生最终会发生性行为。大多数学生几乎在任何情况下都不赞成不忠,尽管由于主要关系出现问题或由于对另一个人的不可抗拒的吸引力而发生的不忠可能是可以原谅的。对伴侣不忠的反应几乎都是消极的,通常会导致关系的终止。出轨的动机多种多样,但通常都与夫妻关系中的担忧或问题有关。对第一段感情的承诺程度是出轨风险的重要预测指标。性宽容的态度和涉及被抛弃焦虑的依恋类型可能预示着约会不忠的可能性。此外,个体差异,如较低的“责任心”,也可能起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Infidelity in Dating Relationships
Abstract Even though research on dating infidelity has been conducted for years, it still contends with limitations, including over reliance on heterosexual college student samples and a lack of longitudinal research on patterns and long-term effects of infidelity. Still, the limited research reveals that college students use very broad criteria for defining dating infidelity. Effectively, almost any form of emotional or sexual intimacy with a person other than one's primary dating partner qualifies as infidelity. Relying on such broad criteria, the studies reveal that many, if not most, students have engaged in some form of infidelity. Extradyadic involvements generally involve flirtation and passionate kissing, which culminate in sexual intercourse for nearly half of male students and one third of female students. The majority of students disapprove of infidelity in virtually all circumstances, although it may be more excusable if it occurs because the primary relationship is troubled or because of an irresistible attraction to another person. Reactions to a partner's infidelity are almost invariably negative, often involving termination of the relationship. Motives for infidelity are varied, but they are usually tied to concerns or problems in the primary relationship. Degree of commitment to one's primary relationship is a significant predictor of risk for infidelity. Sexually permissive attitudes and attachment styles that involve anxiety over abandonment may predict likelihood of engaging in dating infidelity. Additionally, individual differences, such as low “conscientiousness,” may play a role.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信