{"title":"1649年的《可兰经》:后记","authors":"N. Malcolm","doi":"10.1086/JWCI24396006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"version by André Du Ryer (Paris 1647). Shortly afterwards an article on the same topic was published by Professor Mordechai Feingold. As he explained, he and I had been conducting parallel researches on this topic; we had exchanged opinions and information, but were unable to arrive at the same conclusions. In his article he contested my interpretation on a number of points. The purpose of this Post script is both to reply to those criticisms and, in doing so, to present some further relevant information.","PeriodicalId":45703,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE WARBURG AND COURTAULD INSTITUTES","volume":"77 1","pages":"145 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 1649 Koran: A Postscript\",\"authors\":\"N. Malcolm\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/JWCI24396006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"version by André Du Ryer (Paris 1647). Shortly afterwards an article on the same topic was published by Professor Mordechai Feingold. As he explained, he and I had been conducting parallel researches on this topic; we had exchanged opinions and information, but were unable to arrive at the same conclusions. In his article he contested my interpretation on a number of points. The purpose of this Post script is both to reply to those criticisms and, in doing so, to present some further relevant information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF THE WARBURG AND COURTAULD INSTITUTES\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"145 - 171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF THE WARBURG AND COURTAULD INSTITUTES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/JWCI24396006\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE WARBURG AND COURTAULD INSTITUTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/JWCI24396006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
version by André Du Ryer (Paris 1647). Shortly afterwards an article on the same topic was published by Professor Mordechai Feingold. As he explained, he and I had been conducting parallel researches on this topic; we had exchanged opinions and information, but were unable to arrive at the same conclusions. In his article he contested my interpretation on a number of points. The purpose of this Post script is both to reply to those criticisms and, in doing so, to present some further relevant information.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
